Cargando…

Pre-operative stress testing in the evaluation of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Pre-operative stress testing is widely used to evaluate patients for non-cardiac surgeries. However, its value in predicting peri-operative mortality is uncertain. The objective of this study is to assess the type and quality of available evidence in a comprehensive and statistically rig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kalesan, Bindu, Nicewarner, Heidi, Intwala, Sunny, Leung, Christopher, Balady, Gary J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6622497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31295274
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219145
_version_ 1783434167144415232
author Kalesan, Bindu
Nicewarner, Heidi
Intwala, Sunny
Leung, Christopher
Balady, Gary J.
author_facet Kalesan, Bindu
Nicewarner, Heidi
Intwala, Sunny
Leung, Christopher
Balady, Gary J.
author_sort Kalesan, Bindu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pre-operative stress testing is widely used to evaluate patients for non-cardiac surgeries. However, its value in predicting peri-operative mortality is uncertain. The objective of this study is to assess the type and quality of available evidence in a comprehensive and statistically rigorous evaluation regarding the effectiveness of pre-operative stress testing in reducing 30-day post -operative mortality following non -cardiac surgery. METHODS: The databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases (from inception to January 27, 2016) were searched for all studies in English. We included studies with pre-operative stress testing prior to 10 different non-cardiac surgery among adults and excluded studies with sample size<15. The data on study characteristics, methodology and outcomes were extracted independently by two observers and checked by two other observers. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. We performed random effects meta-analysis to estimate relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) in two-group comparison and pooled the rates for stress test alone. Heterogeneity was assessed using I(2) and methodological quality of studies using Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. The predefined protocol was registered in PROSPERO #CRD42016049212. RESULTS: From 1807 abstracts, 79 studies were eligible (297,534 patients): 40 had information on 30-day mortality, of which 6 studies compared stress test versus no stress test. The risk of 30-day mortality was not significant in the comparison of stress testing versus none (RR: 0.79, 95% CI = 0.35–1.80) along with weak evidence for heterogeneity. For the studies that evaluated stress testing without a comparison group, the pooled rates are 1.98% (95% CI = 1.25–2.85) with a high heterogeneity. There was evidence of potential publication bias and small study effects. CONCLUSIONS: Despite substantial interest and research over the past 40 years to predict 30-day mortality risk among patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery, the current body of evidence is insufficient to derive a definitive conclusion as to whether stress testing leads to reduced peri-operative mortality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6622497
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66224972019-07-25 Pre-operative stress testing in the evaluation of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis Kalesan, Bindu Nicewarner, Heidi Intwala, Sunny Leung, Christopher Balady, Gary J. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Pre-operative stress testing is widely used to evaluate patients for non-cardiac surgeries. However, its value in predicting peri-operative mortality is uncertain. The objective of this study is to assess the type and quality of available evidence in a comprehensive and statistically rigorous evaluation regarding the effectiveness of pre-operative stress testing in reducing 30-day post -operative mortality following non -cardiac surgery. METHODS: The databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases (from inception to January 27, 2016) were searched for all studies in English. We included studies with pre-operative stress testing prior to 10 different non-cardiac surgery among adults and excluded studies with sample size<15. The data on study characteristics, methodology and outcomes were extracted independently by two observers and checked by two other observers. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. We performed random effects meta-analysis to estimate relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) in two-group comparison and pooled the rates for stress test alone. Heterogeneity was assessed using I(2) and methodological quality of studies using Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. The predefined protocol was registered in PROSPERO #CRD42016049212. RESULTS: From 1807 abstracts, 79 studies were eligible (297,534 patients): 40 had information on 30-day mortality, of which 6 studies compared stress test versus no stress test. The risk of 30-day mortality was not significant in the comparison of stress testing versus none (RR: 0.79, 95% CI = 0.35–1.80) along with weak evidence for heterogeneity. For the studies that evaluated stress testing without a comparison group, the pooled rates are 1.98% (95% CI = 1.25–2.85) with a high heterogeneity. There was evidence of potential publication bias and small study effects. CONCLUSIONS: Despite substantial interest and research over the past 40 years to predict 30-day mortality risk among patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery, the current body of evidence is insufficient to derive a definitive conclusion as to whether stress testing leads to reduced peri-operative mortality. Public Library of Science 2019-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6622497/ /pubmed/31295274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219145 Text en © 2019 Kalesan et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kalesan, Bindu
Nicewarner, Heidi
Intwala, Sunny
Leung, Christopher
Balady, Gary J.
Pre-operative stress testing in the evaluation of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Pre-operative stress testing in the evaluation of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Pre-operative stress testing in the evaluation of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Pre-operative stress testing in the evaluation of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Pre-operative stress testing in the evaluation of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Pre-operative stress testing in the evaluation of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort pre-operative stress testing in the evaluation of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6622497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31295274
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219145
work_keys_str_mv AT kalesanbindu preoperativestresstestingintheevaluationofpatientsundergoingnoncardiacsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT nicewarnerheidi preoperativestresstestingintheevaluationofpatientsundergoingnoncardiacsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT intwalasunny preoperativestresstestingintheevaluationofpatientsundergoingnoncardiacsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT leungchristopher preoperativestresstestingintheevaluationofpatientsundergoingnoncardiacsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT baladygaryj preoperativestresstestingintheevaluationofpatientsundergoingnoncardiacsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis