Cargando…

Does liberalisation of cannabis policy influence levels of use in adolescents and young adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES: To examine the effect of cannabis policy liberalisation (decriminalisation and legalisation) levels of use in adolescents and young adults. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Included studies were conducted among individuals younger than 25 years and quantit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Melchior, Maria, Nakamura, Aurélie, Bolze, Camille, Hausfater, Félix, El Khoury, Fabienne, Mary-Krause, Murielle, Azevedo Da Silva, Marine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6624043/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31296507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025880
_version_ 1783434196832747520
author Melchior, Maria
Nakamura, Aurélie
Bolze, Camille
Hausfater, Félix
El Khoury, Fabienne
Mary-Krause, Murielle
Azevedo Da Silva, Marine
author_facet Melchior, Maria
Nakamura, Aurélie
Bolze, Camille
Hausfater, Félix
El Khoury, Fabienne
Mary-Krause, Murielle
Azevedo Da Silva, Marine
author_sort Melchior, Maria
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To examine the effect of cannabis policy liberalisation (decriminalisation and legalisation) levels of use in adolescents and young adults. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Included studies were conducted among individuals younger than 25 years and quantitatively assessing consequences of cannabis policy change. We excluded articles: (A) exclusively based on participants older than 25 years; (B) only reporting changes in perceptions of cannabis use; (C) not including at least two measures of cannabis use; (D) not including quantitative data; and (E) reviews, letters, opinions and policy papers. PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase and Web of Science were searched through 1 March 2018. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two independent readers reviewed the eligibility of titles and abstracts and read eligible articles, and four authors assessed the risk of bias (Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies). Extracted data were meta-analysed. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO. RESULTS: 3438 records were identified via search terms and four via citation lists; 2312 were retained after removal of duplicates, 99 were assessed for eligibility and 41 were included in our systematic review. 13 articles examined cannabis decriminalisation, 20 examined legalisation for medical purposes and 8 examined legalisation for recreational purposes. Findings regarding the consequences of cannabis decriminalisation or legalisation for medical purposes were too heterogeneous to be meta-analysed. Our systematic review and meta-analysis suggest a small increase in cannabis use among adolescents and young adults following legalisation of cannabis for recreational purposes (standardised mean difference of 0.03, 95% CI −0.01 to –0.07). Nevertheless, studies characterised by a very low/low risk of bias showed no evidence of changes in cannabis use following policy modifications. CONCLUSIONS: Cannabis policy liberalisation does not appear to result in significant changes in youths’ use, with the possible exception of legalisation for recreational purposes that requires monitoring. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018083950.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6624043
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66240432019-07-28 Does liberalisation of cannabis policy influence levels of use in adolescents and young adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis Melchior, Maria Nakamura, Aurélie Bolze, Camille Hausfater, Félix El Khoury, Fabienne Mary-Krause, Murielle Azevedo Da Silva, Marine BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: To examine the effect of cannabis policy liberalisation (decriminalisation and legalisation) levels of use in adolescents and young adults. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Included studies were conducted among individuals younger than 25 years and quantitatively assessing consequences of cannabis policy change. We excluded articles: (A) exclusively based on participants older than 25 years; (B) only reporting changes in perceptions of cannabis use; (C) not including at least two measures of cannabis use; (D) not including quantitative data; and (E) reviews, letters, opinions and policy papers. PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase and Web of Science were searched through 1 March 2018. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two independent readers reviewed the eligibility of titles and abstracts and read eligible articles, and four authors assessed the risk of bias (Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies). Extracted data were meta-analysed. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO. RESULTS: 3438 records were identified via search terms and four via citation lists; 2312 were retained after removal of duplicates, 99 were assessed for eligibility and 41 were included in our systematic review. 13 articles examined cannabis decriminalisation, 20 examined legalisation for medical purposes and 8 examined legalisation for recreational purposes. Findings regarding the consequences of cannabis decriminalisation or legalisation for medical purposes were too heterogeneous to be meta-analysed. Our systematic review and meta-analysis suggest a small increase in cannabis use among adolescents and young adults following legalisation of cannabis for recreational purposes (standardised mean difference of 0.03, 95% CI −0.01 to –0.07). Nevertheless, studies characterised by a very low/low risk of bias showed no evidence of changes in cannabis use following policy modifications. CONCLUSIONS: Cannabis policy liberalisation does not appear to result in significant changes in youths’ use, with the possible exception of legalisation for recreational purposes that requires monitoring. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018083950. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6624043/ /pubmed/31296507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025880 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Public Health
Melchior, Maria
Nakamura, Aurélie
Bolze, Camille
Hausfater, Félix
El Khoury, Fabienne
Mary-Krause, Murielle
Azevedo Da Silva, Marine
Does liberalisation of cannabis policy influence levels of use in adolescents and young adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Does liberalisation of cannabis policy influence levels of use in adolescents and young adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Does liberalisation of cannabis policy influence levels of use in adolescents and young adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Does liberalisation of cannabis policy influence levels of use in adolescents and young adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Does liberalisation of cannabis policy influence levels of use in adolescents and young adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Does liberalisation of cannabis policy influence levels of use in adolescents and young adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort does liberalisation of cannabis policy influence levels of use in adolescents and young adults? a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6624043/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31296507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025880
work_keys_str_mv AT melchiormaria doesliberalisationofcannabispolicyinfluencelevelsofuseinadolescentsandyoungadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT nakamuraaurelie doesliberalisationofcannabispolicyinfluencelevelsofuseinadolescentsandyoungadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bolzecamille doesliberalisationofcannabispolicyinfluencelevelsofuseinadolescentsandyoungadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hausfaterfelix doesliberalisationofcannabispolicyinfluencelevelsofuseinadolescentsandyoungadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT elkhouryfabienne doesliberalisationofcannabispolicyinfluencelevelsofuseinadolescentsandyoungadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT marykrausemurielle doesliberalisationofcannabispolicyinfluencelevelsofuseinadolescentsandyoungadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT azevedodasilvamarine doesliberalisationofcannabispolicyinfluencelevelsofuseinadolescentsandyoungadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis