Cargando…
Understanding safety differently: developing a model of resilience in the use of intravenous insulin infusions in hospital in-patients—a feasibility study protocol
BACKGROUND: Intravenous insulin infusions are considered the treatment of choice for critically ill patients and non-critically ill patients with persistent raised blood glucose who are unable to eat, to achieve optimal blood glucose levels. The benefits of using intravenous insulin infusions as wel...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6624105/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31296514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029997 |
_version_ | 1783434206283563008 |
---|---|
author | Iflaifel, Mais Hasan Lim, Rosemary Ryan, Kath Crowley, Clare Iedema, Rick |
author_facet | Iflaifel, Mais Hasan Lim, Rosemary Ryan, Kath Crowley, Clare Iedema, Rick |
author_sort | Iflaifel, Mais Hasan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Intravenous insulin infusions are considered the treatment of choice for critically ill patients and non-critically ill patients with persistent raised blood glucose who are unable to eat, to achieve optimal blood glucose levels. The benefits of using intravenous insulin infusions as well as the problems experienced are well described in the scientific literature. Traditional approaches for improving patient safety have focused on identifying errors, understanding their causes and designing solutions to prevent them. Such approaches do not take into account the complex nature of healthcare systems, which cannot be controlled solely by following standards. An emerging approach called Resilient Healthcare proposes that, to improve safety, it is necessary to focus on how work can be performed successfully as well as how work has failed. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study will be conducted at Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and will involve three phases. Phase I: explore how work is imagined by analysing intravenous insulin infusion guidelines and conducting focus group discussions with guidelines developers, managers and healthcare practitioners. Phase II: explore the interplay between how work is imagined and how work is performed using mixed methods. Quantitative data will include blood glucose levels, insulin infusion rates, number of hypoglycaemic and hyperglycaemic events from patients’ electronic records. Qualitative data will include video reflexive ethnography: video recording healthcare practitioners using intravenous insulin infusions and then conducting reflexive meetings with them to discuss selected video footage. Phase III: compare findings from phase I and phase II to develop a model for using intravenous insulin infusions. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approvals have been granted by the South Central—Oxford C Research Ethics Committee, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and University of Reading. The results will be disseminated through presentations at appropriate conferences and meetings, and publications in peer-reviewed journals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6624105 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66241052019-07-28 Understanding safety differently: developing a model of resilience in the use of intravenous insulin infusions in hospital in-patients—a feasibility study protocol Iflaifel, Mais Hasan Lim, Rosemary Ryan, Kath Crowley, Clare Iedema, Rick BMJ Open Diabetes and Endocrinology BACKGROUND: Intravenous insulin infusions are considered the treatment of choice for critically ill patients and non-critically ill patients with persistent raised blood glucose who are unable to eat, to achieve optimal blood glucose levels. The benefits of using intravenous insulin infusions as well as the problems experienced are well described in the scientific literature. Traditional approaches for improving patient safety have focused on identifying errors, understanding their causes and designing solutions to prevent them. Such approaches do not take into account the complex nature of healthcare systems, which cannot be controlled solely by following standards. An emerging approach called Resilient Healthcare proposes that, to improve safety, it is necessary to focus on how work can be performed successfully as well as how work has failed. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study will be conducted at Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and will involve three phases. Phase I: explore how work is imagined by analysing intravenous insulin infusion guidelines and conducting focus group discussions with guidelines developers, managers and healthcare practitioners. Phase II: explore the interplay between how work is imagined and how work is performed using mixed methods. Quantitative data will include blood glucose levels, insulin infusion rates, number of hypoglycaemic and hyperglycaemic events from patients’ electronic records. Qualitative data will include video reflexive ethnography: video recording healthcare practitioners using intravenous insulin infusions and then conducting reflexive meetings with them to discuss selected video footage. Phase III: compare findings from phase I and phase II to develop a model for using intravenous insulin infusions. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approvals have been granted by the South Central—Oxford C Research Ethics Committee, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and University of Reading. The results will be disseminated through presentations at appropriate conferences and meetings, and publications in peer-reviewed journals. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6624105/ /pubmed/31296514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029997 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Diabetes and Endocrinology Iflaifel, Mais Hasan Lim, Rosemary Ryan, Kath Crowley, Clare Iedema, Rick Understanding safety differently: developing a model of resilience in the use of intravenous insulin infusions in hospital in-patients—a feasibility study protocol |
title | Understanding safety differently: developing a model of resilience in the use of intravenous insulin infusions in hospital in-patients—a feasibility study protocol |
title_full | Understanding safety differently: developing a model of resilience in the use of intravenous insulin infusions in hospital in-patients—a feasibility study protocol |
title_fullStr | Understanding safety differently: developing a model of resilience in the use of intravenous insulin infusions in hospital in-patients—a feasibility study protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Understanding safety differently: developing a model of resilience in the use of intravenous insulin infusions in hospital in-patients—a feasibility study protocol |
title_short | Understanding safety differently: developing a model of resilience in the use of intravenous insulin infusions in hospital in-patients—a feasibility study protocol |
title_sort | understanding safety differently: developing a model of resilience in the use of intravenous insulin infusions in hospital in-patients—a feasibility study protocol |
topic | Diabetes and Endocrinology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6624105/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31296514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029997 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT iflaifelmaishasan understandingsafetydifferentlydevelopingamodelofresilienceintheuseofintravenousinsulininfusionsinhospitalinpatientsafeasibilitystudyprotocol AT limrosemary understandingsafetydifferentlydevelopingamodelofresilienceintheuseofintravenousinsulininfusionsinhospitalinpatientsafeasibilitystudyprotocol AT ryankath understandingsafetydifferentlydevelopingamodelofresilienceintheuseofintravenousinsulininfusionsinhospitalinpatientsafeasibilitystudyprotocol AT crowleyclare understandingsafetydifferentlydevelopingamodelofresilienceintheuseofintravenousinsulininfusionsinhospitalinpatientsafeasibilitystudyprotocol AT iedemarick understandingsafetydifferentlydevelopingamodelofresilienceintheuseofintravenousinsulininfusionsinhospitalinpatientsafeasibilitystudyprotocol |