Cargando…

Learning to Expect: Predicting Sounds During Movement Is Related to Sensorimotor Association During Listening

Sensory experiences, such as sound, often result from our motor actions. Over time, repeated sound-producing performance can generate sensorimotor associations. However, it is not clear how sensory and motor information are associated. Here, we explore if sensory prediction is associated with the fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Burgess, Jed D., Major, Brendan P., McNeel, Claire, Clark, Gillian M., Lum, Jarrad A. G., Enticott, Peter G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6624421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31333431
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00215
_version_ 1783434259945488384
author Burgess, Jed D.
Major, Brendan P.
McNeel, Claire
Clark, Gillian M.
Lum, Jarrad A. G.
Enticott, Peter G.
author_facet Burgess, Jed D.
Major, Brendan P.
McNeel, Claire
Clark, Gillian M.
Lum, Jarrad A. G.
Enticott, Peter G.
author_sort Burgess, Jed D.
collection PubMed
description Sensory experiences, such as sound, often result from our motor actions. Over time, repeated sound-producing performance can generate sensorimotor associations. However, it is not clear how sensory and motor information are associated. Here, we explore if sensory prediction is associated with the formation of sensorimotor associations during a learning task. We recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) while participants produced index and little finger-swipes on a bespoke device, generating novel sounds. ERPs were also obtained as participants heard those sounds played back. Peak suppression was compared to assess sensory prediction. Additionally, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used during listening to generate finger-motor evoked potentials (MEPs). MEPs were recorded before and after training upon hearing these sounds, and then compared to reveal sensorimotor associations. Finally, we explored the relationship between these components. Results demonstrated that an increased positive-going peak (e.g., P2) and a suppressed negative-going peak (e.g., N2) were recorded during action, revealing some sensory prediction outcomes (P2: p = 0.050, [Formula: see text] = 0.208; N2: p = 0.001, [Formula: see text] = 0.474). Increased MEPs were also observed upon hearing congruent sounds compared with incongruent sounds (i.e., associated to a finger), demonstrating precise sensorimotor associations that were not present before learning (Index finger: p < 0.001, [Formula: see text] = 0.614; Little finger: p < 0.001, [Formula: see text] = 0.529). Consistent with our broad hypotheses, a negative association between the MEPs in one finger during listening and ERPs during performance of the other was observed (Index finger MEPs and Fz N1 action ERPs; r = −0.655, p = 0.003). Overall, data suggest that predictive mechanisms are associated with the fine-tuning of sensorimotor associations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6624421
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66244212019-07-22 Learning to Expect: Predicting Sounds During Movement Is Related to Sensorimotor Association During Listening Burgess, Jed D. Major, Brendan P. McNeel, Claire Clark, Gillian M. Lum, Jarrad A. G. Enticott, Peter G. Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Sensory experiences, such as sound, often result from our motor actions. Over time, repeated sound-producing performance can generate sensorimotor associations. However, it is not clear how sensory and motor information are associated. Here, we explore if sensory prediction is associated with the formation of sensorimotor associations during a learning task. We recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) while participants produced index and little finger-swipes on a bespoke device, generating novel sounds. ERPs were also obtained as participants heard those sounds played back. Peak suppression was compared to assess sensory prediction. Additionally, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used during listening to generate finger-motor evoked potentials (MEPs). MEPs were recorded before and after training upon hearing these sounds, and then compared to reveal sensorimotor associations. Finally, we explored the relationship between these components. Results demonstrated that an increased positive-going peak (e.g., P2) and a suppressed negative-going peak (e.g., N2) were recorded during action, revealing some sensory prediction outcomes (P2: p = 0.050, [Formula: see text] = 0.208; N2: p = 0.001, [Formula: see text] = 0.474). Increased MEPs were also observed upon hearing congruent sounds compared with incongruent sounds (i.e., associated to a finger), demonstrating precise sensorimotor associations that were not present before learning (Index finger: p < 0.001, [Formula: see text] = 0.614; Little finger: p < 0.001, [Formula: see text] = 0.529). Consistent with our broad hypotheses, a negative association between the MEPs in one finger during listening and ERPs during performance of the other was observed (Index finger MEPs and Fz N1 action ERPs; r = −0.655, p = 0.003). Overall, data suggest that predictive mechanisms are associated with the fine-tuning of sensorimotor associations. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6624421/ /pubmed/31333431 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00215 Text en Copyright © 2019 Burgess, Major, McNeel, Clark, Lum and Enticott. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Burgess, Jed D.
Major, Brendan P.
McNeel, Claire
Clark, Gillian M.
Lum, Jarrad A. G.
Enticott, Peter G.
Learning to Expect: Predicting Sounds During Movement Is Related to Sensorimotor Association During Listening
title Learning to Expect: Predicting Sounds During Movement Is Related to Sensorimotor Association During Listening
title_full Learning to Expect: Predicting Sounds During Movement Is Related to Sensorimotor Association During Listening
title_fullStr Learning to Expect: Predicting Sounds During Movement Is Related to Sensorimotor Association During Listening
title_full_unstemmed Learning to Expect: Predicting Sounds During Movement Is Related to Sensorimotor Association During Listening
title_short Learning to Expect: Predicting Sounds During Movement Is Related to Sensorimotor Association During Listening
title_sort learning to expect: predicting sounds during movement is related to sensorimotor association during listening
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6624421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31333431
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00215
work_keys_str_mv AT burgessjedd learningtoexpectpredictingsoundsduringmovementisrelatedtosensorimotorassociationduringlistening
AT majorbrendanp learningtoexpectpredictingsoundsduringmovementisrelatedtosensorimotorassociationduringlistening
AT mcneelclaire learningtoexpectpredictingsoundsduringmovementisrelatedtosensorimotorassociationduringlistening
AT clarkgillianm learningtoexpectpredictingsoundsduringmovementisrelatedtosensorimotorassociationduringlistening
AT lumjarradag learningtoexpectpredictingsoundsduringmovementisrelatedtosensorimotorassociationduringlistening
AT enticottpeterg learningtoexpectpredictingsoundsduringmovementisrelatedtosensorimotorassociationduringlistening