Cargando…

Toward more reliable stability measurements in stance: recommendations for number of measurements, foot position and feedback -- a cross-sectional study among servicemen

BACKGROUND: In the military, insufficient postural stability is a risk factor for developing lower extremity injuries. Postural stability training programs are effective in preventing these injuries. However, an objective method for the measurement of postural stability in servicemen is lacking. The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Heijden, Saskia Maria Theresia, Prins, Maarten Reinders, van der Wurff, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6624869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31296263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40779-019-0212-y
_version_ 1783434298824589312
author van der Heijden, Saskia Maria Theresia
Prins, Maarten Reinders
van der Wurff, Peter
author_facet van der Heijden, Saskia Maria Theresia
Prins, Maarten Reinders
van der Wurff, Peter
author_sort van der Heijden, Saskia Maria Theresia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the military, insufficient postural stability is a risk factor for developing lower extremity injuries. Postural stability training programs are effective in preventing these injuries. However, an objective method for the measurement of postural stability in servicemen is lacking. The primary objective of this study was to assess the influence of the number of repetitions, different foot positions and real-time visual feedback on postural stability, as well as their effects on the intrasession reliability of postural stability measurements in servicemen. The secondary objective was to assess the concurrent validity of the measurements. METHODS: Twenty healthy servicemen between 20 and 50 years of age and in active duty were eligible for this quantitative, cross-sectional study. The measurements took place on a force plate, measuring the mean velocity of the center of pressure. The participants were asked to stand as still as possible in three different foot positions (wide stance, small stance, and on one leg), five times each for 45 s each time, and the measurements were performed with and without real-time visual feedback. RESULTS: We observed a significant main effect of foot position (P < 0.001), but not of visual feedback (P = 0.119) or repetition number (P = 0.915). Postural stability decreased in the more challenging foot positions. The ICC estimates varied from 0.809 (one repetition in wide stance) to 0.985 (five repetitions on one leg). The common variance (R(2)) between different foot positions without feedback varied between 0.008 (wide stance) and 0.412. CONCLUSIONS: To yield reliable data, wide-stance measurements should be conducted three times, and small-stance measurements and measurements on one leg should be conducted two times. The scores of a measurement in a particular foot position cannot predict the scores of measurements in other foot positions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6624869
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66248692019-07-23 Toward more reliable stability measurements in stance: recommendations for number of measurements, foot position and feedback -- a cross-sectional study among servicemen van der Heijden, Saskia Maria Theresia Prins, Maarten Reinders van der Wurff, Peter Mil Med Res Research BACKGROUND: In the military, insufficient postural stability is a risk factor for developing lower extremity injuries. Postural stability training programs are effective in preventing these injuries. However, an objective method for the measurement of postural stability in servicemen is lacking. The primary objective of this study was to assess the influence of the number of repetitions, different foot positions and real-time visual feedback on postural stability, as well as their effects on the intrasession reliability of postural stability measurements in servicemen. The secondary objective was to assess the concurrent validity of the measurements. METHODS: Twenty healthy servicemen between 20 and 50 years of age and in active duty were eligible for this quantitative, cross-sectional study. The measurements took place on a force plate, measuring the mean velocity of the center of pressure. The participants were asked to stand as still as possible in three different foot positions (wide stance, small stance, and on one leg), five times each for 45 s each time, and the measurements were performed with and without real-time visual feedback. RESULTS: We observed a significant main effect of foot position (P < 0.001), but not of visual feedback (P = 0.119) or repetition number (P = 0.915). Postural stability decreased in the more challenging foot positions. The ICC estimates varied from 0.809 (one repetition in wide stance) to 0.985 (five repetitions on one leg). The common variance (R(2)) between different foot positions without feedback varied between 0.008 (wide stance) and 0.412. CONCLUSIONS: To yield reliable data, wide-stance measurements should be conducted three times, and small-stance measurements and measurements on one leg should be conducted two times. The scores of a measurement in a particular foot position cannot predict the scores of measurements in other foot positions. BioMed Central 2019-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6624869/ /pubmed/31296263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40779-019-0212-y Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
van der Heijden, Saskia Maria Theresia
Prins, Maarten Reinders
van der Wurff, Peter
Toward more reliable stability measurements in stance: recommendations for number of measurements, foot position and feedback -- a cross-sectional study among servicemen
title Toward more reliable stability measurements in stance: recommendations for number of measurements, foot position and feedback -- a cross-sectional study among servicemen
title_full Toward more reliable stability measurements in stance: recommendations for number of measurements, foot position and feedback -- a cross-sectional study among servicemen
title_fullStr Toward more reliable stability measurements in stance: recommendations for number of measurements, foot position and feedback -- a cross-sectional study among servicemen
title_full_unstemmed Toward more reliable stability measurements in stance: recommendations for number of measurements, foot position and feedback -- a cross-sectional study among servicemen
title_short Toward more reliable stability measurements in stance: recommendations for number of measurements, foot position and feedback -- a cross-sectional study among servicemen
title_sort toward more reliable stability measurements in stance: recommendations for number of measurements, foot position and feedback -- a cross-sectional study among servicemen
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6624869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31296263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40779-019-0212-y
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderheijdensaskiamariatheresia towardmorereliablestabilitymeasurementsinstancerecommendationsfornumberofmeasurementsfootpositionandfeedbackacrosssectionalstudyamongservicemen
AT prinsmaartenreinders towardmorereliablestabilitymeasurementsinstancerecommendationsfornumberofmeasurementsfootpositionandfeedbackacrosssectionalstudyamongservicemen
AT vanderwurffpeter towardmorereliablestabilitymeasurementsinstancerecommendationsfornumberofmeasurementsfootpositionandfeedbackacrosssectionalstudyamongservicemen