Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)

Reporting standards in biomedical research have been shown to be suboptimal. The publication of the PRISMA statement has improved the completeness of reporting of systematic reviews, but several issues specific to diagnostic test accuracy are not included in the PRISMA statement. Therefore, a diagno...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McGrath, Trevor A., Moher, David, McInnes, Matthew D. F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Commentary
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6624884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31296260
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1090-9
_version_ 1783434302345707520
author McGrath, Trevor A.
Moher, David
McInnes, Matthew D. F.
author_facet McGrath, Trevor A.
Moher, David
McInnes, Matthew D. F.
author_sort McGrath, Trevor A.
collection PubMed
description Reporting standards in biomedical research have been shown to be suboptimal. The publication of the PRISMA statement has improved the completeness of reporting of systematic reviews, but several issues specific to diagnostic test accuracy are not included in the PRISMA statement. Therefore, a diagnostic test accuracy extension of the PRISMA statement, PRISMA-DTA, was created. This commentary addresses completeness of reporting in systematic reviews, the PRISMA-DTA statement, and strategies for optimal uptake of reporting guidelines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6624884
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66248842019-07-23 Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA) McGrath, Trevor A. Moher, David McInnes, Matthew D. F. Syst Rev Commentary Reporting standards in biomedical research have been shown to be suboptimal. The publication of the PRISMA statement has improved the completeness of reporting of systematic reviews, but several issues specific to diagnostic test accuracy are not included in the PRISMA statement. Therefore, a diagnostic test accuracy extension of the PRISMA statement, PRISMA-DTA, was created. This commentary addresses completeness of reporting in systematic reviews, the PRISMA-DTA statement, and strategies for optimal uptake of reporting guidelines. BioMed Central 2019-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6624884/ /pubmed/31296260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1090-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Commentary
McGrath, Trevor A.
Moher, David
McInnes, Matthew D. F.
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
title Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
title_full Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
title_fullStr Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
title_full_unstemmed Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
title_short Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
title_sort steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy (prisma-dta)
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6624884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31296260
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1090-9
work_keys_str_mv AT mcgrathtrevora stepstowardmorecompletereportingofsystematicreviewsofdiagnostictestaccuracypreferredreportingitemsforsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofdiagnostictestaccuracyprismadta
AT moherdavid stepstowardmorecompletereportingofsystematicreviewsofdiagnostictestaccuracypreferredreportingitemsforsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofdiagnostictestaccuracyprismadta
AT mcinnesmatthewdf stepstowardmorecompletereportingofsystematicreviewsofdiagnostictestaccuracypreferredreportingitemsforsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofdiagnostictestaccuracyprismadta

Ejemplares similares