Cargando…

Measuring the impact of oesophagectomy on physical functioning and physical activity participation: a prospective study

BACKGROUND: Oesophagectomy remains the only curative intervention for oesophageal cancer, with defined nutritional and health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) consequences. It follows therefore that there is a significant risk of decline in physical wellbeing with oesophagectomy however this has bee...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guinan, E. M., Bennett, A. E., Doyle, S. L., O’Neill, L., Gannon, J., Foley, G., Elliott, J. A., O’Sullivan, J., Reynolds, J. V., Hussey, J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6624943/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31299920
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5888-6
_version_ 1783434316092538880
author Guinan, E. M.
Bennett, A. E.
Doyle, S. L.
O’Neill, L.
Gannon, J.
Foley, G.
Elliott, J. A.
O’Sullivan, J.
Reynolds, J. V.
Hussey, J.
author_facet Guinan, E. M.
Bennett, A. E.
Doyle, S. L.
O’Neill, L.
Gannon, J.
Foley, G.
Elliott, J. A.
O’Sullivan, J.
Reynolds, J. V.
Hussey, J.
author_sort Guinan, E. M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Oesophagectomy remains the only curative intervention for oesophageal cancer, with defined nutritional and health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) consequences. It follows therefore that there is a significant risk of decline in physical wellbeing with oesophagectomy however this has been inadequately quantified. This study prospectively examines change in physical functioning and habitual physical activity participation, from pre-surgery through 6-months post-oesophagectomy. METHODS: Patients scheduled for oesophagectomy with curative intent were recruited. Key domains of physical functioning including exercise tolerance (six-minute walk test (6MWT)) and muscle strength (hand-grip strength), and habitual physical activity participation, including sedentary behaviour (accelerometry) were measured pre-surgery (T0) and repeated at 1-month (T1) and 6-months (T2) post-surgery. HR-QOL was measured using the EORTC-QOL C30. RESULTS: Thirty-six participants were studied (mean age 62.4 (8.8) years, n = 26 male, n = 26 transthoracic oesophagectomy). Mean 6MWT distance decreased significantly from T0 to T1 (p = 0.006) and returned to T0 levels between T1 and T2 (p < 0.001). Percentage time spent sedentary increased throughout recovery (p < 0.001) and remained significantly higher at T2 in comparison to T0 (p = 0.003). In contrast, percentage time spent engaged in either light or moderate-to-vigorous intensity activity, all reduced significantly (p < 0.001 for both) and remained significantly lower at T2 in comparison to T0 (p = 0.009 and p = 0.01 respectively). Patients reported deficits in multiple domains of HR-QOL during recovery including global health status (p = 0.04), physical functioning (p < 0.001) and role functioning (p < 0.001). Role functioning remained a clinically important 33-points lower than pre-operative values at T2. CONCLUSION: Habitual physical activity participation remains significantly impaired at 6-months post-oesophagectomy. Physical activity is a measurable and modifiable target for physical rehabilitation, which is closely aligned with patient-reported deficits in role functioning. Rehabilitation aimed at optimising physical health in oesophageal cancer survivorship is warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6624943
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66249432019-07-23 Measuring the impact of oesophagectomy on physical functioning and physical activity participation: a prospective study Guinan, E. M. Bennett, A. E. Doyle, S. L. O’Neill, L. Gannon, J. Foley, G. Elliott, J. A. O’Sullivan, J. Reynolds, J. V. Hussey, J. BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Oesophagectomy remains the only curative intervention for oesophageal cancer, with defined nutritional and health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) consequences. It follows therefore that there is a significant risk of decline in physical wellbeing with oesophagectomy however this has been inadequately quantified. This study prospectively examines change in physical functioning and habitual physical activity participation, from pre-surgery through 6-months post-oesophagectomy. METHODS: Patients scheduled for oesophagectomy with curative intent were recruited. Key domains of physical functioning including exercise tolerance (six-minute walk test (6MWT)) and muscle strength (hand-grip strength), and habitual physical activity participation, including sedentary behaviour (accelerometry) were measured pre-surgery (T0) and repeated at 1-month (T1) and 6-months (T2) post-surgery. HR-QOL was measured using the EORTC-QOL C30. RESULTS: Thirty-six participants were studied (mean age 62.4 (8.8) years, n = 26 male, n = 26 transthoracic oesophagectomy). Mean 6MWT distance decreased significantly from T0 to T1 (p = 0.006) and returned to T0 levels between T1 and T2 (p < 0.001). Percentage time spent sedentary increased throughout recovery (p < 0.001) and remained significantly higher at T2 in comparison to T0 (p = 0.003). In contrast, percentage time spent engaged in either light or moderate-to-vigorous intensity activity, all reduced significantly (p < 0.001 for both) and remained significantly lower at T2 in comparison to T0 (p = 0.009 and p = 0.01 respectively). Patients reported deficits in multiple domains of HR-QOL during recovery including global health status (p = 0.04), physical functioning (p < 0.001) and role functioning (p < 0.001). Role functioning remained a clinically important 33-points lower than pre-operative values at T2. CONCLUSION: Habitual physical activity participation remains significantly impaired at 6-months post-oesophagectomy. Physical activity is a measurable and modifiable target for physical rehabilitation, which is closely aligned with patient-reported deficits in role functioning. Rehabilitation aimed at optimising physical health in oesophageal cancer survivorship is warranted. BioMed Central 2019-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6624943/ /pubmed/31299920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5888-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Guinan, E. M.
Bennett, A. E.
Doyle, S. L.
O’Neill, L.
Gannon, J.
Foley, G.
Elliott, J. A.
O’Sullivan, J.
Reynolds, J. V.
Hussey, J.
Measuring the impact of oesophagectomy on physical functioning and physical activity participation: a prospective study
title Measuring the impact of oesophagectomy on physical functioning and physical activity participation: a prospective study
title_full Measuring the impact of oesophagectomy on physical functioning and physical activity participation: a prospective study
title_fullStr Measuring the impact of oesophagectomy on physical functioning and physical activity participation: a prospective study
title_full_unstemmed Measuring the impact of oesophagectomy on physical functioning and physical activity participation: a prospective study
title_short Measuring the impact of oesophagectomy on physical functioning and physical activity participation: a prospective study
title_sort measuring the impact of oesophagectomy on physical functioning and physical activity participation: a prospective study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6624943/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31299920
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5888-6
work_keys_str_mv AT guinanem measuringtheimpactofoesophagectomyonphysicalfunctioningandphysicalactivityparticipationaprospectivestudy
AT bennettae measuringtheimpactofoesophagectomyonphysicalfunctioningandphysicalactivityparticipationaprospectivestudy
AT doylesl measuringtheimpactofoesophagectomyonphysicalfunctioningandphysicalactivityparticipationaprospectivestudy
AT oneilll measuringtheimpactofoesophagectomyonphysicalfunctioningandphysicalactivityparticipationaprospectivestudy
AT gannonj measuringtheimpactofoesophagectomyonphysicalfunctioningandphysicalactivityparticipationaprospectivestudy
AT foleyg measuringtheimpactofoesophagectomyonphysicalfunctioningandphysicalactivityparticipationaprospectivestudy
AT elliottja measuringtheimpactofoesophagectomyonphysicalfunctioningandphysicalactivityparticipationaprospectivestudy
AT osullivanj measuringtheimpactofoesophagectomyonphysicalfunctioningandphysicalactivityparticipationaprospectivestudy
AT reynoldsjv measuringtheimpactofoesophagectomyonphysicalfunctioningandphysicalactivityparticipationaprospectivestudy
AT husseyj measuringtheimpactofoesophagectomyonphysicalfunctioningandphysicalactivityparticipationaprospectivestudy