Cargando…

Evaluation of a 3D surface imaging system for deep inspiration breath-hold patient positioning and intra-fraction monitoring

PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy of a surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT) system for positioning of breast cancer patients in breath-hold (BH) with respect to cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Secondly, to evaluate the thorax position stability during BHs with SGRT, when using an air-volume gui...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hamming, Vincent C., Visser, Christa, Batin, Estelle, McDermott, Leah N., Busz, Dianne M., Both, Stefan, Langendijk, Johannes A., Sijtsema, Nanna M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6624957/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31296245
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1329-6
_version_ 1783434319361998848
author Hamming, Vincent C.
Visser, Christa
Batin, Estelle
McDermott, Leah N.
Busz, Dianne M.
Both, Stefan
Langendijk, Johannes A.
Sijtsema, Nanna M.
author_facet Hamming, Vincent C.
Visser, Christa
Batin, Estelle
McDermott, Leah N.
Busz, Dianne M.
Both, Stefan
Langendijk, Johannes A.
Sijtsema, Nanna M.
author_sort Hamming, Vincent C.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy of a surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT) system for positioning of breast cancer patients in breath-hold (BH) with respect to cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Secondly, to evaluate the thorax position stability during BHs with SGRT, when using an air-volume guidance system. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eighteen left-sided breast cancer patients were monitored with SGRT during CBCT and treatment, both in BH. CBCT scans were matched on the target volume and the patient surface. The setup error differences were evaluated, including with linear regression analysis. The intra-fraction variability and stability of the air-volume guided BHs were determined from SGRT measurements. The variability was determined from the maximum difference between the different BH levels within one treatment fraction. The stability was determined from the difference between the start and end position of each BH. RESULTS: SGRT data correlated well with CBCT data. The correlation was stronger for surface-to-CBCT (0.61) than target volume-to-CBCT (0.44) matches. Systematic and random setup error differences were ≤ 2 mm in all directions. The 95% limits of agreement (mean ± 2SD) were 0.1 ± 3.0, 0.6 ± 4.1 and 0.4 ± 3.4 mm in the three orthogonal directions, for the surface-to-CBCT matches. For air-volume guided BHs, the variability detected with SGRT was 2.2, 2.8 and 2.3 mm, and the stability − 1.0, 2.1 and 1.5 mm, in three orthogonal directions. Furthermore, the SGRT system could detect unexpected patient movement, undetectable by the air-volume BH system. CONCLUSION: With SGRT, left-sided breast cancer patients can be positioned and monitored continuously to maintain position errors within 5 mm. Low intra-fraction variability and good stability can be achieved with the air-volume BH system, however, additional patient position information is available with SGRT, that cannot be detected with air-volume BH systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6624957
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66249572019-07-23 Evaluation of a 3D surface imaging system for deep inspiration breath-hold patient positioning and intra-fraction monitoring Hamming, Vincent C. Visser, Christa Batin, Estelle McDermott, Leah N. Busz, Dianne M. Both, Stefan Langendijk, Johannes A. Sijtsema, Nanna M. Radiat Oncol Research PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy of a surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT) system for positioning of breast cancer patients in breath-hold (BH) with respect to cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Secondly, to evaluate the thorax position stability during BHs with SGRT, when using an air-volume guidance system. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eighteen left-sided breast cancer patients were monitored with SGRT during CBCT and treatment, both in BH. CBCT scans were matched on the target volume and the patient surface. The setup error differences were evaluated, including with linear regression analysis. The intra-fraction variability and stability of the air-volume guided BHs were determined from SGRT measurements. The variability was determined from the maximum difference between the different BH levels within one treatment fraction. The stability was determined from the difference between the start and end position of each BH. RESULTS: SGRT data correlated well with CBCT data. The correlation was stronger for surface-to-CBCT (0.61) than target volume-to-CBCT (0.44) matches. Systematic and random setup error differences were ≤ 2 mm in all directions. The 95% limits of agreement (mean ± 2SD) were 0.1 ± 3.0, 0.6 ± 4.1 and 0.4 ± 3.4 mm in the three orthogonal directions, for the surface-to-CBCT matches. For air-volume guided BHs, the variability detected with SGRT was 2.2, 2.8 and 2.3 mm, and the stability − 1.0, 2.1 and 1.5 mm, in three orthogonal directions. Furthermore, the SGRT system could detect unexpected patient movement, undetectable by the air-volume BH system. CONCLUSION: With SGRT, left-sided breast cancer patients can be positioned and monitored continuously to maintain position errors within 5 mm. Low intra-fraction variability and good stability can be achieved with the air-volume BH system, however, additional patient position information is available with SGRT, that cannot be detected with air-volume BH systems. BioMed Central 2019-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6624957/ /pubmed/31296245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1329-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Hamming, Vincent C.
Visser, Christa
Batin, Estelle
McDermott, Leah N.
Busz, Dianne M.
Both, Stefan
Langendijk, Johannes A.
Sijtsema, Nanna M.
Evaluation of a 3D surface imaging system for deep inspiration breath-hold patient positioning and intra-fraction monitoring
title Evaluation of a 3D surface imaging system for deep inspiration breath-hold patient positioning and intra-fraction monitoring
title_full Evaluation of a 3D surface imaging system for deep inspiration breath-hold patient positioning and intra-fraction monitoring
title_fullStr Evaluation of a 3D surface imaging system for deep inspiration breath-hold patient positioning and intra-fraction monitoring
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a 3D surface imaging system for deep inspiration breath-hold patient positioning and intra-fraction monitoring
title_short Evaluation of a 3D surface imaging system for deep inspiration breath-hold patient positioning and intra-fraction monitoring
title_sort evaluation of a 3d surface imaging system for deep inspiration breath-hold patient positioning and intra-fraction monitoring
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6624957/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31296245
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1329-6
work_keys_str_mv AT hammingvincentc evaluationofa3dsurfaceimagingsystemfordeepinspirationbreathholdpatientpositioningandintrafractionmonitoring
AT visserchrista evaluationofa3dsurfaceimagingsystemfordeepinspirationbreathholdpatientpositioningandintrafractionmonitoring
AT batinestelle evaluationofa3dsurfaceimagingsystemfordeepinspirationbreathholdpatientpositioningandintrafractionmonitoring
AT mcdermottleahn evaluationofa3dsurfaceimagingsystemfordeepinspirationbreathholdpatientpositioningandintrafractionmonitoring
AT buszdiannem evaluationofa3dsurfaceimagingsystemfordeepinspirationbreathholdpatientpositioningandintrafractionmonitoring
AT bothstefan evaluationofa3dsurfaceimagingsystemfordeepinspirationbreathholdpatientpositioningandintrafractionmonitoring
AT langendijkjohannesa evaluationofa3dsurfaceimagingsystemfordeepinspirationbreathholdpatientpositioningandintrafractionmonitoring
AT sijtsemanannam evaluationofa3dsurfaceimagingsystemfordeepinspirationbreathholdpatientpositioningandintrafractionmonitoring