Cargando…
Evaluation of a 3D surface imaging system for deep inspiration breath-hold patient positioning and intra-fraction monitoring
PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy of a surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT) system for positioning of breast cancer patients in breath-hold (BH) with respect to cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Secondly, to evaluate the thorax position stability during BHs with SGRT, when using an air-volume gui...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6624957/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31296245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1329-6 |
_version_ | 1783434319361998848 |
---|---|
author | Hamming, Vincent C. Visser, Christa Batin, Estelle McDermott, Leah N. Busz, Dianne M. Both, Stefan Langendijk, Johannes A. Sijtsema, Nanna M. |
author_facet | Hamming, Vincent C. Visser, Christa Batin, Estelle McDermott, Leah N. Busz, Dianne M. Both, Stefan Langendijk, Johannes A. Sijtsema, Nanna M. |
author_sort | Hamming, Vincent C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy of a surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT) system for positioning of breast cancer patients in breath-hold (BH) with respect to cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Secondly, to evaluate the thorax position stability during BHs with SGRT, when using an air-volume guidance system. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eighteen left-sided breast cancer patients were monitored with SGRT during CBCT and treatment, both in BH. CBCT scans were matched on the target volume and the patient surface. The setup error differences were evaluated, including with linear regression analysis. The intra-fraction variability and stability of the air-volume guided BHs were determined from SGRT measurements. The variability was determined from the maximum difference between the different BH levels within one treatment fraction. The stability was determined from the difference between the start and end position of each BH. RESULTS: SGRT data correlated well with CBCT data. The correlation was stronger for surface-to-CBCT (0.61) than target volume-to-CBCT (0.44) matches. Systematic and random setup error differences were ≤ 2 mm in all directions. The 95% limits of agreement (mean ± 2SD) were 0.1 ± 3.0, 0.6 ± 4.1 and 0.4 ± 3.4 mm in the three orthogonal directions, for the surface-to-CBCT matches. For air-volume guided BHs, the variability detected with SGRT was 2.2, 2.8 and 2.3 mm, and the stability − 1.0, 2.1 and 1.5 mm, in three orthogonal directions. Furthermore, the SGRT system could detect unexpected patient movement, undetectable by the air-volume BH system. CONCLUSION: With SGRT, left-sided breast cancer patients can be positioned and monitored continuously to maintain position errors within 5 mm. Low intra-fraction variability and good stability can be achieved with the air-volume BH system, however, additional patient position information is available with SGRT, that cannot be detected with air-volume BH systems. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6624957 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66249572019-07-23 Evaluation of a 3D surface imaging system for deep inspiration breath-hold patient positioning and intra-fraction monitoring Hamming, Vincent C. Visser, Christa Batin, Estelle McDermott, Leah N. Busz, Dianne M. Both, Stefan Langendijk, Johannes A. Sijtsema, Nanna M. Radiat Oncol Research PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy of a surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT) system for positioning of breast cancer patients in breath-hold (BH) with respect to cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Secondly, to evaluate the thorax position stability during BHs with SGRT, when using an air-volume guidance system. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eighteen left-sided breast cancer patients were monitored with SGRT during CBCT and treatment, both in BH. CBCT scans were matched on the target volume and the patient surface. The setup error differences were evaluated, including with linear regression analysis. The intra-fraction variability and stability of the air-volume guided BHs were determined from SGRT measurements. The variability was determined from the maximum difference between the different BH levels within one treatment fraction. The stability was determined from the difference between the start and end position of each BH. RESULTS: SGRT data correlated well with CBCT data. The correlation was stronger for surface-to-CBCT (0.61) than target volume-to-CBCT (0.44) matches. Systematic and random setup error differences were ≤ 2 mm in all directions. The 95% limits of agreement (mean ± 2SD) were 0.1 ± 3.0, 0.6 ± 4.1 and 0.4 ± 3.4 mm in the three orthogonal directions, for the surface-to-CBCT matches. For air-volume guided BHs, the variability detected with SGRT was 2.2, 2.8 and 2.3 mm, and the stability − 1.0, 2.1 and 1.5 mm, in three orthogonal directions. Furthermore, the SGRT system could detect unexpected patient movement, undetectable by the air-volume BH system. CONCLUSION: With SGRT, left-sided breast cancer patients can be positioned and monitored continuously to maintain position errors within 5 mm. Low intra-fraction variability and good stability can be achieved with the air-volume BH system, however, additional patient position information is available with SGRT, that cannot be detected with air-volume BH systems. BioMed Central 2019-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6624957/ /pubmed/31296245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1329-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Hamming, Vincent C. Visser, Christa Batin, Estelle McDermott, Leah N. Busz, Dianne M. Both, Stefan Langendijk, Johannes A. Sijtsema, Nanna M. Evaluation of a 3D surface imaging system for deep inspiration breath-hold patient positioning and intra-fraction monitoring |
title | Evaluation of a 3D surface imaging system for deep inspiration breath-hold patient positioning and intra-fraction monitoring |
title_full | Evaluation of a 3D surface imaging system for deep inspiration breath-hold patient positioning and intra-fraction monitoring |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of a 3D surface imaging system for deep inspiration breath-hold patient positioning and intra-fraction monitoring |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of a 3D surface imaging system for deep inspiration breath-hold patient positioning and intra-fraction monitoring |
title_short | Evaluation of a 3D surface imaging system for deep inspiration breath-hold patient positioning and intra-fraction monitoring |
title_sort | evaluation of a 3d surface imaging system for deep inspiration breath-hold patient positioning and intra-fraction monitoring |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6624957/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31296245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1329-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hammingvincentc evaluationofa3dsurfaceimagingsystemfordeepinspirationbreathholdpatientpositioningandintrafractionmonitoring AT visserchrista evaluationofa3dsurfaceimagingsystemfordeepinspirationbreathholdpatientpositioningandintrafractionmonitoring AT batinestelle evaluationofa3dsurfaceimagingsystemfordeepinspirationbreathholdpatientpositioningandintrafractionmonitoring AT mcdermottleahn evaluationofa3dsurfaceimagingsystemfordeepinspirationbreathholdpatientpositioningandintrafractionmonitoring AT buszdiannem evaluationofa3dsurfaceimagingsystemfordeepinspirationbreathholdpatientpositioningandintrafractionmonitoring AT bothstefan evaluationofa3dsurfaceimagingsystemfordeepinspirationbreathholdpatientpositioningandintrafractionmonitoring AT langendijkjohannesa evaluationofa3dsurfaceimagingsystemfordeepinspirationbreathholdpatientpositioningandintrafractionmonitoring AT sijtsemanannam evaluationofa3dsurfaceimagingsystemfordeepinspirationbreathholdpatientpositioningandintrafractionmonitoring |