Cargando…

A cost-effectiveness analysis of mupirocin and chlorhexidine gluconate for Staphylococcus aureus decolonization prior to hip and knee arthroplasty in Alberta, Canada compared to standard of care

BACKGROUND: While decolonization of Staphylococcus aureus reduces surgical site infection (SSI) rates following hip and knee arthroplasty, its cost-effectiveness is uncertain. We sought to examine the cost-effectiveness of a decolonization protocol for Staphylococcus aureus prior to hip and knee rep...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rennert-May, Elissa, Conly, John, Smith, Stephanie, Puloski, Shannon, Henderson, Elizabeth, Au, Flora, Manns, Braden
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6625116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31338160
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-019-0568-5
_version_ 1783434353486856192
author Rennert-May, Elissa
Conly, John
Smith, Stephanie
Puloski, Shannon
Henderson, Elizabeth
Au, Flora
Manns, Braden
author_facet Rennert-May, Elissa
Conly, John
Smith, Stephanie
Puloski, Shannon
Henderson, Elizabeth
Au, Flora
Manns, Braden
author_sort Rennert-May, Elissa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: While decolonization of Staphylococcus aureus reduces surgical site infection (SSI) rates following hip and knee arthroplasty, its cost-effectiveness is uncertain. We sought to examine the cost-effectiveness of a decolonization protocol for Staphylococcus aureus prior to hip and knee replacement in Alberta compared to standard care – no decolonization. METHODS: Decision analytic models and a probabilistic sensitivity analysis were used for a cost-effectiveness analysis, with the effectiveness of decolonization based on a large published pre- and post- intervention trial. The primary outcomes of the models were infections prevented and health care costs. We modelled the cost-effectiveness of decolonization in a hypothetical cohort of adult patients undergoing hip and knee replacement in Alberta, Canada. Information on the incidence of complex surgical site infections (SSIs), as well as the cost of care for patients with and without SSIs was taken from a provincial infection control database, and health administrative data. RESULTS: Use of the decolonization bundle was cost saving compared to usual care ($153/person), and resulted in 16 complex Staphylococcus aureus SSIs annually as opposed to 32 (with approximately 8000 hip or knee arthroplasties performed). The probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the majority (84%) of the time the decolonization bundle was cost saving. The model was robust to one-way sensitivity analyses conducted within plausible ranges. There were small upfront costs associated with using a decolonization protocol, however, this model demonstrated cost savings over one year. In a Markov model that considered the impact of a decolonization bundle over a lifetime as it pertained to the need for subsequent joint replacements and patient quality of life, the bundle still resulted in cost savings ($161/person). CONCLUSIONS: Decolonization for Staphylococcus aureus prior to hip and knee replacements resulted in cost savings and fewer SSIs, and should be considered prior to these procedures. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13756-019-0568-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6625116
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66251162019-07-23 A cost-effectiveness analysis of mupirocin and chlorhexidine gluconate for Staphylococcus aureus decolonization prior to hip and knee arthroplasty in Alberta, Canada compared to standard of care Rennert-May, Elissa Conly, John Smith, Stephanie Puloski, Shannon Henderson, Elizabeth Au, Flora Manns, Braden Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Research BACKGROUND: While decolonization of Staphylococcus aureus reduces surgical site infection (SSI) rates following hip and knee arthroplasty, its cost-effectiveness is uncertain. We sought to examine the cost-effectiveness of a decolonization protocol for Staphylococcus aureus prior to hip and knee replacement in Alberta compared to standard care – no decolonization. METHODS: Decision analytic models and a probabilistic sensitivity analysis were used for a cost-effectiveness analysis, with the effectiveness of decolonization based on a large published pre- and post- intervention trial. The primary outcomes of the models were infections prevented and health care costs. We modelled the cost-effectiveness of decolonization in a hypothetical cohort of adult patients undergoing hip and knee replacement in Alberta, Canada. Information on the incidence of complex surgical site infections (SSIs), as well as the cost of care for patients with and without SSIs was taken from a provincial infection control database, and health administrative data. RESULTS: Use of the decolonization bundle was cost saving compared to usual care ($153/person), and resulted in 16 complex Staphylococcus aureus SSIs annually as opposed to 32 (with approximately 8000 hip or knee arthroplasties performed). The probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the majority (84%) of the time the decolonization bundle was cost saving. The model was robust to one-way sensitivity analyses conducted within plausible ranges. There were small upfront costs associated with using a decolonization protocol, however, this model demonstrated cost savings over one year. In a Markov model that considered the impact of a decolonization bundle over a lifetime as it pertained to the need for subsequent joint replacements and patient quality of life, the bundle still resulted in cost savings ($161/person). CONCLUSIONS: Decolonization for Staphylococcus aureus prior to hip and knee replacements resulted in cost savings and fewer SSIs, and should be considered prior to these procedures. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13756-019-0568-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6625116/ /pubmed/31338160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-019-0568-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Rennert-May, Elissa
Conly, John
Smith, Stephanie
Puloski, Shannon
Henderson, Elizabeth
Au, Flora
Manns, Braden
A cost-effectiveness analysis of mupirocin and chlorhexidine gluconate for Staphylococcus aureus decolonization prior to hip and knee arthroplasty in Alberta, Canada compared to standard of care
title A cost-effectiveness analysis of mupirocin and chlorhexidine gluconate for Staphylococcus aureus decolonization prior to hip and knee arthroplasty in Alberta, Canada compared to standard of care
title_full A cost-effectiveness analysis of mupirocin and chlorhexidine gluconate for Staphylococcus aureus decolonization prior to hip and knee arthroplasty in Alberta, Canada compared to standard of care
title_fullStr A cost-effectiveness analysis of mupirocin and chlorhexidine gluconate for Staphylococcus aureus decolonization prior to hip and knee arthroplasty in Alberta, Canada compared to standard of care
title_full_unstemmed A cost-effectiveness analysis of mupirocin and chlorhexidine gluconate for Staphylococcus aureus decolonization prior to hip and knee arthroplasty in Alberta, Canada compared to standard of care
title_short A cost-effectiveness analysis of mupirocin and chlorhexidine gluconate for Staphylococcus aureus decolonization prior to hip and knee arthroplasty in Alberta, Canada compared to standard of care
title_sort cost-effectiveness analysis of mupirocin and chlorhexidine gluconate for staphylococcus aureus decolonization prior to hip and knee arthroplasty in alberta, canada compared to standard of care
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6625116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31338160
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-019-0568-5
work_keys_str_mv AT rennertmayelissa acosteffectivenessanalysisofmupirocinandchlorhexidinegluconateforstaphylococcusaureusdecolonizationpriortohipandkneearthroplastyinalbertacanadacomparedtostandardofcare
AT conlyjohn acosteffectivenessanalysisofmupirocinandchlorhexidinegluconateforstaphylococcusaureusdecolonizationpriortohipandkneearthroplastyinalbertacanadacomparedtostandardofcare
AT smithstephanie acosteffectivenessanalysisofmupirocinandchlorhexidinegluconateforstaphylococcusaureusdecolonizationpriortohipandkneearthroplastyinalbertacanadacomparedtostandardofcare
AT puloskishannon acosteffectivenessanalysisofmupirocinandchlorhexidinegluconateforstaphylococcusaureusdecolonizationpriortohipandkneearthroplastyinalbertacanadacomparedtostandardofcare
AT hendersonelizabeth acosteffectivenessanalysisofmupirocinandchlorhexidinegluconateforstaphylococcusaureusdecolonizationpriortohipandkneearthroplastyinalbertacanadacomparedtostandardofcare
AT auflora acosteffectivenessanalysisofmupirocinandchlorhexidinegluconateforstaphylococcusaureusdecolonizationpriortohipandkneearthroplastyinalbertacanadacomparedtostandardofcare
AT mannsbraden acosteffectivenessanalysisofmupirocinandchlorhexidinegluconateforstaphylococcusaureusdecolonizationpriortohipandkneearthroplastyinalbertacanadacomparedtostandardofcare
AT rennertmayelissa costeffectivenessanalysisofmupirocinandchlorhexidinegluconateforstaphylococcusaureusdecolonizationpriortohipandkneearthroplastyinalbertacanadacomparedtostandardofcare
AT conlyjohn costeffectivenessanalysisofmupirocinandchlorhexidinegluconateforstaphylococcusaureusdecolonizationpriortohipandkneearthroplastyinalbertacanadacomparedtostandardofcare
AT smithstephanie costeffectivenessanalysisofmupirocinandchlorhexidinegluconateforstaphylococcusaureusdecolonizationpriortohipandkneearthroplastyinalbertacanadacomparedtostandardofcare
AT puloskishannon costeffectivenessanalysisofmupirocinandchlorhexidinegluconateforstaphylococcusaureusdecolonizationpriortohipandkneearthroplastyinalbertacanadacomparedtostandardofcare
AT hendersonelizabeth costeffectivenessanalysisofmupirocinandchlorhexidinegluconateforstaphylococcusaureusdecolonizationpriortohipandkneearthroplastyinalbertacanadacomparedtostandardofcare
AT auflora costeffectivenessanalysisofmupirocinandchlorhexidinegluconateforstaphylococcusaureusdecolonizationpriortohipandkneearthroplastyinalbertacanadacomparedtostandardofcare
AT mannsbraden costeffectivenessanalysisofmupirocinandchlorhexidinegluconateforstaphylococcusaureusdecolonizationpriortohipandkneearthroplastyinalbertacanadacomparedtostandardofcare