Cargando…
Social Media and Social Functioning in Psychosis: A Systematic Review
BACKGROUND: Individuals with psychosis are heavy consumers of social media. It is unknown to what degree measures of social functioning include measures of online social activity. OBJECTIVE: To examine the inclusion of social media activity in measures of social functioning in psychosis and ultrahig...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6625220/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31254338 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/13957 |
_version_ | 1783434373625806848 |
---|---|
author | Bjornestad, Jone Hegelstad, Wenche Ten Velden Berg, Henrik Davidson, Larry Joa, Inge Johannessen, Jan Olav Melle, Ingrid Stain, Helen J Pallesen, Ståle |
author_facet | Bjornestad, Jone Hegelstad, Wenche Ten Velden Berg, Henrik Davidson, Larry Joa, Inge Johannessen, Jan Olav Melle, Ingrid Stain, Helen J Pallesen, Ståle |
author_sort | Bjornestad, Jone |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Individuals with psychosis are heavy consumers of social media. It is unknown to what degree measures of social functioning include measures of online social activity. OBJECTIVE: To examine the inclusion of social media activity in measures of social functioning in psychosis and ultrahigh risk (UHR) for psychosis. METHODS: Two independent authors conducted a search using the following electronic databases: Epistemonikos, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO. The included articles were required to meet all of the following criteria: (1) an empirical study published in the English language in a peer-reviewed journal; (2) the study included a measure of objective or subjective offline (ie, non-Web-mediated contact) and/or online social functioning (ie, Web-mediated contact); (3) the social functioning measure had to be used in samples meeting criteria (ie, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders or International Classification of Diseases) for a psychotic disorder or UHR for psychosis; and (4) the study was published between January 2004 and February 2019. Facebook was launched as the first large-scale social media platform in 2004 and, therefore, it is highly improbable that studies conducted prior to 2004 would have included measures of social media activity. RESULTS: The electronic search resulted in 11,844 distinct articles. Full-text evaluation was conducted on 719 articles, of which 597 articles met inclusion criteria. A total of 58 social functioning measures were identified. With some exceptions, reports on reliability and validity were scarce, and only one measure integrated social media social activity. CONCLUSIONS: The ecological validity of social functioning measures is challenged by the lack of assessment of social media activity, as it fails to reflect an important aspect of the current social reality of persons with psychosis. Measures should be revised to include social media activity and thus avoid the clinical consequences of inadequate assessment of social functioning. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) CRD42017058514; http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID=CRD42017058514 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6625220 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66252202019-07-30 Social Media and Social Functioning in Psychosis: A Systematic Review Bjornestad, Jone Hegelstad, Wenche Ten Velden Berg, Henrik Davidson, Larry Joa, Inge Johannessen, Jan Olav Melle, Ingrid Stain, Helen J Pallesen, Ståle J Med Internet Res Review BACKGROUND: Individuals with psychosis are heavy consumers of social media. It is unknown to what degree measures of social functioning include measures of online social activity. OBJECTIVE: To examine the inclusion of social media activity in measures of social functioning in psychosis and ultrahigh risk (UHR) for psychosis. METHODS: Two independent authors conducted a search using the following electronic databases: Epistemonikos, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO. The included articles were required to meet all of the following criteria: (1) an empirical study published in the English language in a peer-reviewed journal; (2) the study included a measure of objective or subjective offline (ie, non-Web-mediated contact) and/or online social functioning (ie, Web-mediated contact); (3) the social functioning measure had to be used in samples meeting criteria (ie, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders or International Classification of Diseases) for a psychotic disorder or UHR for psychosis; and (4) the study was published between January 2004 and February 2019. Facebook was launched as the first large-scale social media platform in 2004 and, therefore, it is highly improbable that studies conducted prior to 2004 would have included measures of social media activity. RESULTS: The electronic search resulted in 11,844 distinct articles. Full-text evaluation was conducted on 719 articles, of which 597 articles met inclusion criteria. A total of 58 social functioning measures were identified. With some exceptions, reports on reliability and validity were scarce, and only one measure integrated social media social activity. CONCLUSIONS: The ecological validity of social functioning measures is challenged by the lack of assessment of social media activity, as it fails to reflect an important aspect of the current social reality of persons with psychosis. Measures should be revised to include social media activity and thus avoid the clinical consequences of inadequate assessment of social functioning. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) CRD42017058514; http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID=CRD42017058514 JMIR Publications 2019-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6625220/ /pubmed/31254338 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/13957 Text en ©Jone Bjornestad, Wenche Ten Velden Hegelstad, Henrik Berg, Larry Davidson, Inge Joa, Jan Olav Johannessen, Ingrid Melle, Helen J Stain, Ståle Pallesen. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 28.06.2019. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/.as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Review Bjornestad, Jone Hegelstad, Wenche Ten Velden Berg, Henrik Davidson, Larry Joa, Inge Johannessen, Jan Olav Melle, Ingrid Stain, Helen J Pallesen, Ståle Social Media and Social Functioning in Psychosis: A Systematic Review |
title | Social Media and Social Functioning in Psychosis: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Social Media and Social Functioning in Psychosis: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Social Media and Social Functioning in Psychosis: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Social Media and Social Functioning in Psychosis: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Social Media and Social Functioning in Psychosis: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | social media and social functioning in psychosis: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6625220/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31254338 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/13957 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bjornestadjone socialmediaandsocialfunctioninginpsychosisasystematicreview AT hegelstadwenchetenvelden socialmediaandsocialfunctioninginpsychosisasystematicreview AT berghenrik socialmediaandsocialfunctioninginpsychosisasystematicreview AT davidsonlarry socialmediaandsocialfunctioninginpsychosisasystematicreview AT joainge socialmediaandsocialfunctioninginpsychosisasystematicreview AT johannessenjanolav socialmediaandsocialfunctioninginpsychosisasystematicreview AT melleingrid socialmediaandsocialfunctioninginpsychosisasystematicreview AT stainhelenj socialmediaandsocialfunctioninginpsychosisasystematicreview AT pallesenstale socialmediaandsocialfunctioninginpsychosisasystematicreview |