Cargando…

Social Media and Social Functioning in Psychosis: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Individuals with psychosis are heavy consumers of social media. It is unknown to what degree measures of social functioning include measures of online social activity. OBJECTIVE: To examine the inclusion of social media activity in measures of social functioning in psychosis and ultrahig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bjornestad, Jone, Hegelstad, Wenche Ten Velden, Berg, Henrik, Davidson, Larry, Joa, Inge, Johannessen, Jan Olav, Melle, Ingrid, Stain, Helen J, Pallesen, Ståle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6625220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31254338
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/13957
_version_ 1783434373625806848
author Bjornestad, Jone
Hegelstad, Wenche Ten Velden
Berg, Henrik
Davidson, Larry
Joa, Inge
Johannessen, Jan Olav
Melle, Ingrid
Stain, Helen J
Pallesen, Ståle
author_facet Bjornestad, Jone
Hegelstad, Wenche Ten Velden
Berg, Henrik
Davidson, Larry
Joa, Inge
Johannessen, Jan Olav
Melle, Ingrid
Stain, Helen J
Pallesen, Ståle
author_sort Bjornestad, Jone
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Individuals with psychosis are heavy consumers of social media. It is unknown to what degree measures of social functioning include measures of online social activity. OBJECTIVE: To examine the inclusion of social media activity in measures of social functioning in psychosis and ultrahigh risk (UHR) for psychosis. METHODS: Two independent authors conducted a search using the following electronic databases: Epistemonikos, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO. The included articles were required to meet all of the following criteria: (1) an empirical study published in the English language in a peer-reviewed journal; (2) the study included a measure of objective or subjective offline (ie, non-Web-mediated contact) and/or online social functioning (ie, Web-mediated contact); (3) the social functioning measure had to be used in samples meeting criteria (ie, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders or International Classification of Diseases) for a psychotic disorder or UHR for psychosis; and (4) the study was published between January 2004 and February 2019. Facebook was launched as the first large-scale social media platform in 2004 and, therefore, it is highly improbable that studies conducted prior to 2004 would have included measures of social media activity. RESULTS: The electronic search resulted in 11,844 distinct articles. Full-text evaluation was conducted on 719 articles, of which 597 articles met inclusion criteria. A total of 58 social functioning measures were identified. With some exceptions, reports on reliability and validity were scarce, and only one measure integrated social media social activity. CONCLUSIONS: The ecological validity of social functioning measures is challenged by the lack of assessment of social media activity, as it fails to reflect an important aspect of the current social reality of persons with psychosis. Measures should be revised to include social media activity and thus avoid the clinical consequences of inadequate assessment of social functioning. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) CRD42017058514; http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID=CRD42017058514
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6625220
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66252202019-07-30 Social Media and Social Functioning in Psychosis: A Systematic Review Bjornestad, Jone Hegelstad, Wenche Ten Velden Berg, Henrik Davidson, Larry Joa, Inge Johannessen, Jan Olav Melle, Ingrid Stain, Helen J Pallesen, Ståle J Med Internet Res Review BACKGROUND: Individuals with psychosis are heavy consumers of social media. It is unknown to what degree measures of social functioning include measures of online social activity. OBJECTIVE: To examine the inclusion of social media activity in measures of social functioning in psychosis and ultrahigh risk (UHR) for psychosis. METHODS: Two independent authors conducted a search using the following electronic databases: Epistemonikos, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO. The included articles were required to meet all of the following criteria: (1) an empirical study published in the English language in a peer-reviewed journal; (2) the study included a measure of objective or subjective offline (ie, non-Web-mediated contact) and/or online social functioning (ie, Web-mediated contact); (3) the social functioning measure had to be used in samples meeting criteria (ie, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders or International Classification of Diseases) for a psychotic disorder or UHR for psychosis; and (4) the study was published between January 2004 and February 2019. Facebook was launched as the first large-scale social media platform in 2004 and, therefore, it is highly improbable that studies conducted prior to 2004 would have included measures of social media activity. RESULTS: The electronic search resulted in 11,844 distinct articles. Full-text evaluation was conducted on 719 articles, of which 597 articles met inclusion criteria. A total of 58 social functioning measures were identified. With some exceptions, reports on reliability and validity were scarce, and only one measure integrated social media social activity. CONCLUSIONS: The ecological validity of social functioning measures is challenged by the lack of assessment of social media activity, as it fails to reflect an important aspect of the current social reality of persons with psychosis. Measures should be revised to include social media activity and thus avoid the clinical consequences of inadequate assessment of social functioning. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) CRD42017058514; http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID=CRD42017058514 JMIR Publications 2019-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6625220/ /pubmed/31254338 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/13957 Text en ©Jone Bjornestad, Wenche Ten Velden Hegelstad, Henrik Berg, Larry Davidson, Inge Joa, Jan Olav Johannessen, Ingrid Melle, Helen J Stain, Ståle Pallesen. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 28.06.2019. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/.as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Review
Bjornestad, Jone
Hegelstad, Wenche Ten Velden
Berg, Henrik
Davidson, Larry
Joa, Inge
Johannessen, Jan Olav
Melle, Ingrid
Stain, Helen J
Pallesen, Ståle
Social Media and Social Functioning in Psychosis: A Systematic Review
title Social Media and Social Functioning in Psychosis: A Systematic Review
title_full Social Media and Social Functioning in Psychosis: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Social Media and Social Functioning in Psychosis: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Social Media and Social Functioning in Psychosis: A Systematic Review
title_short Social Media and Social Functioning in Psychosis: A Systematic Review
title_sort social media and social functioning in psychosis: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6625220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31254338
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/13957
work_keys_str_mv AT bjornestadjone socialmediaandsocialfunctioninginpsychosisasystematicreview
AT hegelstadwenchetenvelden socialmediaandsocialfunctioninginpsychosisasystematicreview
AT berghenrik socialmediaandsocialfunctioninginpsychosisasystematicreview
AT davidsonlarry socialmediaandsocialfunctioninginpsychosisasystematicreview
AT joainge socialmediaandsocialfunctioninginpsychosisasystematicreview
AT johannessenjanolav socialmediaandsocialfunctioninginpsychosisasystematicreview
AT melleingrid socialmediaandsocialfunctioninginpsychosisasystematicreview
AT stainhelenj socialmediaandsocialfunctioninginpsychosisasystematicreview
AT pallesenstale socialmediaandsocialfunctioninginpsychosisasystematicreview