Cargando…

A comparative study of the effects of concentrated growth factors in two different forms on osteogenesis in vitro

Extending the release cycle of growth factors to match the cycle of bone remodeling is difficult. When using concentrated growth factors (CGFs), the release of growth factors is excessively rapid. In the present study, CGF samples were prepared by centrifugation. CGF samples were then lyophilized an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Liping, Wan, Mianjia, Li, Zhengmao, Zhong, Ningying, Liang, Dongliang, Ge, Linhu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: D.A. Spandidos 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6625392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31173196
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2019.10313
_version_ 1783434406741934080
author Wang, Liping
Wan, Mianjia
Li, Zhengmao
Zhong, Ningying
Liang, Dongliang
Ge, Linhu
author_facet Wang, Liping
Wan, Mianjia
Li, Zhengmao
Zhong, Ningying
Liang, Dongliang
Ge, Linhu
author_sort Wang, Liping
collection PubMed
description Extending the release cycle of growth factors to match the cycle of bone remodeling is difficult. When using concentrated growth factors (CGFs), the release of growth factors is excessively rapid. In the present study, CGF samples were prepared by centrifugation. CGF samples were then lyophilized and grinded into a powder, which was termed freeze-dried CGF. The freeze-dried CGF samples were mixed with chitosan-alginate composite hydrogels, and the mixture was lyophilized. The result was a chitosan-alginate composite CGF membrane, which was called sustained-release CGF. This study investigated whether freeze-dried CGF in a chitosan-alginate composite gel can release CGF steadily to achieve effective osteogenesis. The proliferation and osteogenic expression of MC3T3-E1 cells induced by the supernatants from incubation with freeze-dried CGF and sustained-release CGF were evaluated. The concentrations of the growth factors, transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1), insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), platelet-derived growth factor-AB (PDGF-AB) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), in these two experimental groups at different times were determined by ELISA kits. The freeze-dried CGF showed better osteogenic performance than the sustained-release CGF in the early stages. At later stages, the sustained-release CGF had significant advantages over freeze-dried CGF in terms of promoting osteogenic mineralization. By characterizing the biologic properties of the CGF in the two different forms in vitro, we obtained a better understanding of their clinical effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6625392
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher D.A. Spandidos
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66253922019-07-31 A comparative study of the effects of concentrated growth factors in two different forms on osteogenesis in vitro Wang, Liping Wan, Mianjia Li, Zhengmao Zhong, Ningying Liang, Dongliang Ge, Linhu Mol Med Rep Articles Extending the release cycle of growth factors to match the cycle of bone remodeling is difficult. When using concentrated growth factors (CGFs), the release of growth factors is excessively rapid. In the present study, CGF samples were prepared by centrifugation. CGF samples were then lyophilized and grinded into a powder, which was termed freeze-dried CGF. The freeze-dried CGF samples were mixed with chitosan-alginate composite hydrogels, and the mixture was lyophilized. The result was a chitosan-alginate composite CGF membrane, which was called sustained-release CGF. This study investigated whether freeze-dried CGF in a chitosan-alginate composite gel can release CGF steadily to achieve effective osteogenesis. The proliferation and osteogenic expression of MC3T3-E1 cells induced by the supernatants from incubation with freeze-dried CGF and sustained-release CGF were evaluated. The concentrations of the growth factors, transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1), insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), platelet-derived growth factor-AB (PDGF-AB) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), in these two experimental groups at different times were determined by ELISA kits. The freeze-dried CGF showed better osteogenic performance than the sustained-release CGF in the early stages. At later stages, the sustained-release CGF had significant advantages over freeze-dried CGF in terms of promoting osteogenic mineralization. By characterizing the biologic properties of the CGF in the two different forms in vitro, we obtained a better understanding of their clinical effects. D.A. Spandidos 2019-08 2019-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6625392/ /pubmed/31173196 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2019.10313 Text en Copyright: © Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Articles
Wang, Liping
Wan, Mianjia
Li, Zhengmao
Zhong, Ningying
Liang, Dongliang
Ge, Linhu
A comparative study of the effects of concentrated growth factors in two different forms on osteogenesis in vitro
title A comparative study of the effects of concentrated growth factors in two different forms on osteogenesis in vitro
title_full A comparative study of the effects of concentrated growth factors in two different forms on osteogenesis in vitro
title_fullStr A comparative study of the effects of concentrated growth factors in two different forms on osteogenesis in vitro
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study of the effects of concentrated growth factors in two different forms on osteogenesis in vitro
title_short A comparative study of the effects of concentrated growth factors in two different forms on osteogenesis in vitro
title_sort comparative study of the effects of concentrated growth factors in two different forms on osteogenesis in vitro
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6625392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31173196
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2019.10313
work_keys_str_mv AT wangliping acomparativestudyoftheeffectsofconcentratedgrowthfactorsintwodifferentformsonosteogenesisinvitro
AT wanmianjia acomparativestudyoftheeffectsofconcentratedgrowthfactorsintwodifferentformsonosteogenesisinvitro
AT lizhengmao acomparativestudyoftheeffectsofconcentratedgrowthfactorsintwodifferentformsonosteogenesisinvitro
AT zhongningying acomparativestudyoftheeffectsofconcentratedgrowthfactorsintwodifferentformsonosteogenesisinvitro
AT liangdongliang acomparativestudyoftheeffectsofconcentratedgrowthfactorsintwodifferentformsonosteogenesisinvitro
AT gelinhu acomparativestudyoftheeffectsofconcentratedgrowthfactorsintwodifferentformsonosteogenesisinvitro
AT wangliping comparativestudyoftheeffectsofconcentratedgrowthfactorsintwodifferentformsonosteogenesisinvitro
AT wanmianjia comparativestudyoftheeffectsofconcentratedgrowthfactorsintwodifferentformsonosteogenesisinvitro
AT lizhengmao comparativestudyoftheeffectsofconcentratedgrowthfactorsintwodifferentformsonosteogenesisinvitro
AT zhongningying comparativestudyoftheeffectsofconcentratedgrowthfactorsintwodifferentformsonosteogenesisinvitro
AT liangdongliang comparativestudyoftheeffectsofconcentratedgrowthfactorsintwodifferentformsonosteogenesisinvitro
AT gelinhu comparativestudyoftheeffectsofconcentratedgrowthfactorsintwodifferentformsonosteogenesisinvitro