Cargando…
Does Change in Attention Control Mediate the Impact of tDCS on Attentional Bias for Threat? Limited Evidence from a Double-blind Sham-controlled Experiment in an Unselected Sample
Neurocognitive models of attentional bias for threat posit that attentional bias may result from a decreased activation of the left prefrontal cortex, and especially of its dorsolateral part (dlPFC), resulting in an impaired attention control. Consequently, a transient increase of neural activity wi...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Ubiquity Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6625550/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31328008 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/pb.449 |
_version_ | 1783434437259689984 |
---|---|
author | Coussement, Charlotte Maurage, Pierre Billieux, Joël Heeren, Alexandre |
author_facet | Coussement, Charlotte Maurage, Pierre Billieux, Joël Heeren, Alexandre |
author_sort | Coussement, Charlotte |
collection | PubMed |
description | Neurocognitive models of attentional bias for threat posit that attentional bias may result from a decreased activation of the left prefrontal cortex, and especially of its dorsolateral part (dlPFC), resulting in an impaired attention control. Consequently, a transient increase of neural activity within the left dlPFC via non-invasive brain stimulation reduces attentional bias among both anxious and nonanxious participants. Yet, it is still unclear whether the impact of dlPFC activation on attentional bias is mediated by improvement in attention control. In this experiment, we sought to test this hypothesis in an unselected sample (n = 20). Accordingly, we adopted a double-blind within-subject protocol in which we delivered a single-session of anodal versus sham transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) over the left dlPFC during the completion of a task assessing attention control. We also assessed its subsequent impact on attentional bias. Neither attention control nor attentional bias did significantly improve following anodal tDCS. Although our results do not support our main hypothesis, we believe the present null results to be particularly useful for future meta-research in the field. We also formulated a series of methodological recommendations for future research aiming at testing the tDCS-induced modification of attentional bias. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6625550 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Ubiquity Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66255502019-07-19 Does Change in Attention Control Mediate the Impact of tDCS on Attentional Bias for Threat? Limited Evidence from a Double-blind Sham-controlled Experiment in an Unselected Sample Coussement, Charlotte Maurage, Pierre Billieux, Joël Heeren, Alexandre Psychol Belg Research Article Neurocognitive models of attentional bias for threat posit that attentional bias may result from a decreased activation of the left prefrontal cortex, and especially of its dorsolateral part (dlPFC), resulting in an impaired attention control. Consequently, a transient increase of neural activity within the left dlPFC via non-invasive brain stimulation reduces attentional bias among both anxious and nonanxious participants. Yet, it is still unclear whether the impact of dlPFC activation on attentional bias is mediated by improvement in attention control. In this experiment, we sought to test this hypothesis in an unselected sample (n = 20). Accordingly, we adopted a double-blind within-subject protocol in which we delivered a single-session of anodal versus sham transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) over the left dlPFC during the completion of a task assessing attention control. We also assessed its subsequent impact on attentional bias. Neither attention control nor attentional bias did significantly improve following anodal tDCS. Although our results do not support our main hypothesis, we believe the present null results to be particularly useful for future meta-research in the field. We also formulated a series of methodological recommendations for future research aiming at testing the tDCS-induced modification of attentional bias. Ubiquity Press 2019-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6625550/ /pubmed/31328008 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/pb.449 Text en Copyright: © 2019 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Coussement, Charlotte Maurage, Pierre Billieux, Joël Heeren, Alexandre Does Change in Attention Control Mediate the Impact of tDCS on Attentional Bias for Threat? Limited Evidence from a Double-blind Sham-controlled Experiment in an Unselected Sample |
title | Does Change in Attention Control Mediate the Impact of tDCS on Attentional Bias for Threat? Limited Evidence from a Double-blind Sham-controlled Experiment in an Unselected Sample |
title_full | Does Change in Attention Control Mediate the Impact of tDCS on Attentional Bias for Threat? Limited Evidence from a Double-blind Sham-controlled Experiment in an Unselected Sample |
title_fullStr | Does Change in Attention Control Mediate the Impact of tDCS on Attentional Bias for Threat? Limited Evidence from a Double-blind Sham-controlled Experiment in an Unselected Sample |
title_full_unstemmed | Does Change in Attention Control Mediate the Impact of tDCS on Attentional Bias for Threat? Limited Evidence from a Double-blind Sham-controlled Experiment in an Unselected Sample |
title_short | Does Change in Attention Control Mediate the Impact of tDCS on Attentional Bias for Threat? Limited Evidence from a Double-blind Sham-controlled Experiment in an Unselected Sample |
title_sort | does change in attention control mediate the impact of tdcs on attentional bias for threat? limited evidence from a double-blind sham-controlled experiment in an unselected sample |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6625550/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31328008 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/pb.449 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT coussementcharlotte doeschangeinattentioncontrolmediatetheimpactoftdcsonattentionalbiasforthreatlimitedevidencefromadoubleblindshamcontrolledexperimentinanunselectedsample AT mauragepierre doeschangeinattentioncontrolmediatetheimpactoftdcsonattentionalbiasforthreatlimitedevidencefromadoubleblindshamcontrolledexperimentinanunselectedsample AT billieuxjoel doeschangeinattentioncontrolmediatetheimpactoftdcsonattentionalbiasforthreatlimitedevidencefromadoubleblindshamcontrolledexperimentinanunselectedsample AT heerenalexandre doeschangeinattentioncontrolmediatetheimpactoftdcsonattentionalbiasforthreatlimitedevidencefromadoubleblindshamcontrolledexperimentinanunselectedsample |