Cargando…

Preferences for Firearm Locking Devices and Device Features Among Participants in a Firearm Safety Event

INTRODUCTION: Safe firearm storage is associated with a lower risk of firearm-related injury and death. Although providing firearm locking devices is a key component of firearm safety interventions, little is known about the types and characteristics of devices preferred by firearm users or others w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simonetti, Joseph A., Simeona, Cassie, Gallagher, Chelsie, Bennett, Elizabeth, Rivara, Frederick P., Rowhani-Rahbar, Ali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6625681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31316693
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2019.5.42727
_version_ 1783434451674464256
author Simonetti, Joseph A.
Simeona, Cassie
Gallagher, Chelsie
Bennett, Elizabeth
Rivara, Frederick P.
Rowhani-Rahbar, Ali
author_facet Simonetti, Joseph A.
Simeona, Cassie
Gallagher, Chelsie
Bennett, Elizabeth
Rivara, Frederick P.
Rowhani-Rahbar, Ali
author_sort Simonetti, Joseph A.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Safe firearm storage is associated with a lower risk of firearm-related injury and death. Although providing firearm locking devices is a key component of firearm safety interventions, little is known about the types and characteristics of devices preferred by firearm users or others who make decisions about firearm storage. The aim of this study was to describe preferences for firearm locking devices and device features among firearm safety event participants. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey in the State of Washington in 2016 that assessed participants’ preferences for five firearm locking devices (eg, trigger lock) and seven device features (eg, quick access). We categorized respondents (n=401) as adults in households with 1) all firearms locked, 2) at least one unlocked firearm, and 3) no firearms. We analyzed data in 2017. RESULTS: Device ownership and feature preferences varied substantially but were similar across the three household categories. Of those residing with unlocked firearms, 84% reported they would consider using or definitely use a lock box, whereas 11% reported they would never use a trigger lock. Additionally, of those residing with unlocked firearms, 80% and 89% reported that the ability to lock a firearm while loaded and unlock it quickly were, respectively, “very important” or “absolutely essential.” CONCLUSION: Participants had differing preferences for firearm locking devices and device features, although preferences were largely similar across households with locked, unlocked, or no firearms. At least eight in ten participants reported “great importance” regarding the ability to lock a firearm while loaded and unlock it quickly, which is likely related to perceptions about the utility of safely stored firearms for household protection. Designing firearm safety interventions to match the needs and preferences of those who make firearm storage decisions may improve their effectiveness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6625681
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66256812019-07-17 Preferences for Firearm Locking Devices and Device Features Among Participants in a Firearm Safety Event Simonetti, Joseph A. Simeona, Cassie Gallagher, Chelsie Bennett, Elizabeth Rivara, Frederick P. Rowhani-Rahbar, Ali West J Emerg Med Violence Assessment and Prevention INTRODUCTION: Safe firearm storage is associated with a lower risk of firearm-related injury and death. Although providing firearm locking devices is a key component of firearm safety interventions, little is known about the types and characteristics of devices preferred by firearm users or others who make decisions about firearm storage. The aim of this study was to describe preferences for firearm locking devices and device features among firearm safety event participants. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey in the State of Washington in 2016 that assessed participants’ preferences for five firearm locking devices (eg, trigger lock) and seven device features (eg, quick access). We categorized respondents (n=401) as adults in households with 1) all firearms locked, 2) at least one unlocked firearm, and 3) no firearms. We analyzed data in 2017. RESULTS: Device ownership and feature preferences varied substantially but were similar across the three household categories. Of those residing with unlocked firearms, 84% reported they would consider using or definitely use a lock box, whereas 11% reported they would never use a trigger lock. Additionally, of those residing with unlocked firearms, 80% and 89% reported that the ability to lock a firearm while loaded and unlock it quickly were, respectively, “very important” or “absolutely essential.” CONCLUSION: Participants had differing preferences for firearm locking devices and device features, although preferences were largely similar across households with locked, unlocked, or no firearms. At least eight in ten participants reported “great importance” regarding the ability to lock a firearm while loaded and unlock it quickly, which is likely related to perceptions about the utility of safely stored firearms for household protection. Designing firearm safety interventions to match the needs and preferences of those who make firearm storage decisions may improve their effectiveness. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2019-07 2019-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6625681/ /pubmed/31316693 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2019.5.42727 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Simonetti et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Violence Assessment and Prevention
Simonetti, Joseph A.
Simeona, Cassie
Gallagher, Chelsie
Bennett, Elizabeth
Rivara, Frederick P.
Rowhani-Rahbar, Ali
Preferences for Firearm Locking Devices and Device Features Among Participants in a Firearm Safety Event
title Preferences for Firearm Locking Devices and Device Features Among Participants in a Firearm Safety Event
title_full Preferences for Firearm Locking Devices and Device Features Among Participants in a Firearm Safety Event
title_fullStr Preferences for Firearm Locking Devices and Device Features Among Participants in a Firearm Safety Event
title_full_unstemmed Preferences for Firearm Locking Devices and Device Features Among Participants in a Firearm Safety Event
title_short Preferences for Firearm Locking Devices and Device Features Among Participants in a Firearm Safety Event
title_sort preferences for firearm locking devices and device features among participants in a firearm safety event
topic Violence Assessment and Prevention
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6625681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31316693
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2019.5.42727
work_keys_str_mv AT simonettijosepha preferencesforfirearmlockingdevicesanddevicefeaturesamongparticipantsinafirearmsafetyevent
AT simeonacassie preferencesforfirearmlockingdevicesanddevicefeaturesamongparticipantsinafirearmsafetyevent
AT gallagherchelsie preferencesforfirearmlockingdevicesanddevicefeaturesamongparticipantsinafirearmsafetyevent
AT bennettelizabeth preferencesforfirearmlockingdevicesanddevicefeaturesamongparticipantsinafirearmsafetyevent
AT rivarafrederickp preferencesforfirearmlockingdevicesanddevicefeaturesamongparticipantsinafirearmsafetyevent
AT rowhanirahbarali preferencesforfirearmlockingdevicesanddevicefeaturesamongparticipantsinafirearmsafetyevent