Cargando…

Closed testing using surrogate hypotheses with restricted alternatives

INTRODUCTION: The closed testing principle provides strong control of the type I error probabilities of tests of a set of hypotheses that are closed under intersection such that a given hypothesis H can only be tested and rejected at level α if all intersection hypotheses containing that hypothesis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lachin, John M., Bebu, Ionut, Larsen, Michael D., Younes, Naji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6625735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31299051
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219520
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: The closed testing principle provides strong control of the type I error probabilities of tests of a set of hypotheses that are closed under intersection such that a given hypothesis H can only be tested and rejected at level α if all intersection hypotheses containing that hypothesis are also tested and rejected at level α. For the higher order hypotheses, multivariate tests (> 1df) are generally employed. However, such tests are directed to an omnibus alternative hypothesis of a difference in any direction for any component that may be less meaningful than a test directed against a restricted alternative hypothesis of interest. METHODS: Herein we describe applications of this principle using an α-level test of a surrogate hypothesis [Image: see text] such that the type I error probability is preserved if [Image: see text] such that rejection of [Image: see text] implies rejection of H. Applications include the analysis of multiple event times in a Wei-Lachin test against a one-directional alternative, a test of the treatment group difference in the means of K repeated measures using a 1 df test of the difference in the longitudinal LSMEANS, and analyses within subgroups when a test of treatment by subgroup interaction is significant. In such cases the successive higher order surrogate tests can be aimed at detecting parameter values that fall within a more desirable restricted subspace of the global alternative hypothesis parameter space. CONCLUSION: Closed testing using α-level tests of surrogate hypotheses will protect the type I error probability and detect specific alternatives of interest, as opposed to the global alternative hypothesis of any difference in any direction.