Cargando…
Closed testing using surrogate hypotheses with restricted alternatives
INTRODUCTION: The closed testing principle provides strong control of the type I error probabilities of tests of a set of hypotheses that are closed under intersection such that a given hypothesis H can only be tested and rejected at level α if all intersection hypotheses containing that hypothesis...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6625735/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31299051 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219520 |
_version_ | 1783434461651664896 |
---|---|
author | Lachin, John M. Bebu, Ionut Larsen, Michael D. Younes, Naji |
author_facet | Lachin, John M. Bebu, Ionut Larsen, Michael D. Younes, Naji |
author_sort | Lachin, John M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The closed testing principle provides strong control of the type I error probabilities of tests of a set of hypotheses that are closed under intersection such that a given hypothesis H can only be tested and rejected at level α if all intersection hypotheses containing that hypothesis are also tested and rejected at level α. For the higher order hypotheses, multivariate tests (> 1df) are generally employed. However, such tests are directed to an omnibus alternative hypothesis of a difference in any direction for any component that may be less meaningful than a test directed against a restricted alternative hypothesis of interest. METHODS: Herein we describe applications of this principle using an α-level test of a surrogate hypothesis [Image: see text] such that the type I error probability is preserved if [Image: see text] such that rejection of [Image: see text] implies rejection of H. Applications include the analysis of multiple event times in a Wei-Lachin test against a one-directional alternative, a test of the treatment group difference in the means of K repeated measures using a 1 df test of the difference in the longitudinal LSMEANS, and analyses within subgroups when a test of treatment by subgroup interaction is significant. In such cases the successive higher order surrogate tests can be aimed at detecting parameter values that fall within a more desirable restricted subspace of the global alternative hypothesis parameter space. CONCLUSION: Closed testing using α-level tests of surrogate hypotheses will protect the type I error probability and detect specific alternatives of interest, as opposed to the global alternative hypothesis of any difference in any direction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6625735 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66257352019-07-25 Closed testing using surrogate hypotheses with restricted alternatives Lachin, John M. Bebu, Ionut Larsen, Michael D. Younes, Naji PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: The closed testing principle provides strong control of the type I error probabilities of tests of a set of hypotheses that are closed under intersection such that a given hypothesis H can only be tested and rejected at level α if all intersection hypotheses containing that hypothesis are also tested and rejected at level α. For the higher order hypotheses, multivariate tests (> 1df) are generally employed. However, such tests are directed to an omnibus alternative hypothesis of a difference in any direction for any component that may be less meaningful than a test directed against a restricted alternative hypothesis of interest. METHODS: Herein we describe applications of this principle using an α-level test of a surrogate hypothesis [Image: see text] such that the type I error probability is preserved if [Image: see text] such that rejection of [Image: see text] implies rejection of H. Applications include the analysis of multiple event times in a Wei-Lachin test against a one-directional alternative, a test of the treatment group difference in the means of K repeated measures using a 1 df test of the difference in the longitudinal LSMEANS, and analyses within subgroups when a test of treatment by subgroup interaction is significant. In such cases the successive higher order surrogate tests can be aimed at detecting parameter values that fall within a more desirable restricted subspace of the global alternative hypothesis parameter space. CONCLUSION: Closed testing using α-level tests of surrogate hypotheses will protect the type I error probability and detect specific alternatives of interest, as opposed to the global alternative hypothesis of any difference in any direction. Public Library of Science 2019-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6625735/ /pubmed/31299051 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219520 Text en © 2019 Lachin et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lachin, John M. Bebu, Ionut Larsen, Michael D. Younes, Naji Closed testing using surrogate hypotheses with restricted alternatives |
title | Closed testing using surrogate hypotheses with restricted alternatives |
title_full | Closed testing using surrogate hypotheses with restricted alternatives |
title_fullStr | Closed testing using surrogate hypotheses with restricted alternatives |
title_full_unstemmed | Closed testing using surrogate hypotheses with restricted alternatives |
title_short | Closed testing using surrogate hypotheses with restricted alternatives |
title_sort | closed testing using surrogate hypotheses with restricted alternatives |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6625735/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31299051 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219520 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lachinjohnm closedtestingusingsurrogatehypotheseswithrestrictedalternatives AT bebuionut closedtestingusingsurrogatehypotheseswithrestrictedalternatives AT larsenmichaeld closedtestingusingsurrogatehypotheseswithrestrictedalternatives AT younesnaji closedtestingusingsurrogatehypotheseswithrestrictedalternatives |