Cargando…
Interaction of a universal adhesive with different surface treatments with feldespathic ceramics
INTRODUCTION: Universal adhesives provide the possibility of simplified protocols for using ceramics; however, determining the synergy of these adhesives with silanes and the possibility of replacing silanes requires extensive research. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of a universal adhesive, a...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6626276/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31337939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.03.008 |
_version_ | 1783434545570250752 |
---|---|
author | Suárez-Moya, Diana Alejandra Cruz-González, Alberto Carlos Calvo-Ramírez, Juan Norberto |
author_facet | Suárez-Moya, Diana Alejandra Cruz-González, Alberto Carlos Calvo-Ramírez, Juan Norberto |
author_sort | Suárez-Moya, Diana Alejandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Universal adhesives provide the possibility of simplified protocols for using ceramics; however, determining the synergy of these adhesives with silanes and the possibility of replacing silanes requires extensive research. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of a universal adhesive, associated with airborne-particle abrasion, acid etching, and silane, on the bond strength of a feldspathic ceramic CAD-CAM to composite resin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CAD-CAM feldspathic ceramic blocks were cut into 2-mm slices and were randomly divided into six groups (n = 10): A1, Single Bond Universal (SBU); A2, Adper Single Bond 2 (SB2); B1, silane + SBU; B2, silane + SB2; C1, acid etching + silane + SBU; C2, and acid etching + silane + SB2. Tygon tubes were placed and filled with composite resin. All samples were stored in distilled water at 37 °C for 24 h and then subjected to micro-shear tests. The type of failure was analyzed using a stereomicroscope. RESULTS: SBU demonstrated slightly higher adhesion values compared with SB2 in all groups; however, no significant differences were observed between the adhesives (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: SBU was not statistically superior to the control adhesive. The use of silane prior to a universal adhesive should not yet be eliminated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6626276 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66262762019-07-23 Interaction of a universal adhesive with different surface treatments with feldespathic ceramics Suárez-Moya, Diana Alejandra Cruz-González, Alberto Carlos Calvo-Ramírez, Juan Norberto Saudi Dent J Original Article INTRODUCTION: Universal adhesives provide the possibility of simplified protocols for using ceramics; however, determining the synergy of these adhesives with silanes and the possibility of replacing silanes requires extensive research. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of a universal adhesive, associated with airborne-particle abrasion, acid etching, and silane, on the bond strength of a feldspathic ceramic CAD-CAM to composite resin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CAD-CAM feldspathic ceramic blocks were cut into 2-mm slices and were randomly divided into six groups (n = 10): A1, Single Bond Universal (SBU); A2, Adper Single Bond 2 (SB2); B1, silane + SBU; B2, silane + SB2; C1, acid etching + silane + SBU; C2, and acid etching + silane + SB2. Tygon tubes were placed and filled with composite resin. All samples were stored in distilled water at 37 °C for 24 h and then subjected to micro-shear tests. The type of failure was analyzed using a stereomicroscope. RESULTS: SBU demonstrated slightly higher adhesion values compared with SB2 in all groups; however, no significant differences were observed between the adhesives (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: SBU was not statistically superior to the control adhesive. The use of silane prior to a universal adhesive should not yet be eliminated. Elsevier 2019-07 2019-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6626276/ /pubmed/31337939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.03.008 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Suárez-Moya, Diana Alejandra Cruz-González, Alberto Carlos Calvo-Ramírez, Juan Norberto Interaction of a universal adhesive with different surface treatments with feldespathic ceramics |
title | Interaction of a universal adhesive with different surface treatments with feldespathic ceramics |
title_full | Interaction of a universal adhesive with different surface treatments with feldespathic ceramics |
title_fullStr | Interaction of a universal adhesive with different surface treatments with feldespathic ceramics |
title_full_unstemmed | Interaction of a universal adhesive with different surface treatments with feldespathic ceramics |
title_short | Interaction of a universal adhesive with different surface treatments with feldespathic ceramics |
title_sort | interaction of a universal adhesive with different surface treatments with feldespathic ceramics |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6626276/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31337939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.03.008 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT suarezmoyadianaalejandra interactionofauniversaladhesivewithdifferentsurfacetreatmentswithfeldespathicceramics AT cruzgonzalezalbertocarlos interactionofauniversaladhesivewithdifferentsurfacetreatmentswithfeldespathicceramics AT calvoramirezjuannorberto interactionofauniversaladhesivewithdifferentsurfacetreatmentswithfeldespathicceramics |