Cargando…
Functional electrical stimulation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized controlled pilot study
BACKGROUND: Inadequate quadriceps strength following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) often results in alterations in gait pattern that are usually reported during loading response. Neuro-muscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is frequently used to overcome this quadriceps weakness....
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6626389/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31299999 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-019-0566-0 |
_version_ | 1783434567418380288 |
---|---|
author | Moran, Uria Gottlieb, Uri Gam, Arnon Springer, Shmuel |
author_facet | Moran, Uria Gottlieb, Uri Gam, Arnon Springer, Shmuel |
author_sort | Moran, Uria |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Inadequate quadriceps strength following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) often results in alterations in gait pattern that are usually reported during loading response. Neuro-muscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is frequently used to overcome this quadriceps weakness. Despite the beneficial effects of NMES, persistent deficits in strength and gait are reported. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of applying quadriceps functional electrical stimulation (FES) during walking in addition to standard rehabilitation, in the initial stage of ACLR rehabilitation. METHODS: Subjects were randomized to quadriceps FES synchronized with walking group (n = 10) or quadriceps NMES (duty cycle of 10 s on/10 s off) group (n = 13). Both interventions were performed for 10 min three days a week, in addition to a standard rehabilitation program. Assessments were performed up to 2 weeks before the ACLR (pre-ACLR), and 4 weeks postoperatively. Outcomes measured were gait speed, single limb stance gait symmetry, quadriceps isometric peak strength ratio (peak strength at 4 weeks/peak strength pre-ACLR) and peak strength inter-limb symmetry. Gait outcomes were also assessed 1-week post-surgery. RESULTS: Subjects in both groups regained pre-ACLR gait speed and symmetry after 4 weeks of rehabilitation, with no difference between groups. However, although pre-ACLR quadriceps peak strength was similar between groups (FES - 205 Nm, NMES − 225 Nm, p = 0.605), subjects in the FES group regained 82% of their pre-quadriceps strength compared to 47% in the NMES group (p = 0.02). In addition, after 4 weeks, the FES group had significantly better inter-limb strength symmetry 0.63 ± 0.15 vs. 0.39 ± 0.18 in the NMES group (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Quadriceps FES combined with traditional rehabilitation is a feasible, early intervention treatment option, post-ACLR. Furthermore, at 4 weeks post-surgery, FES was more effective in recovering quadriceps muscle strength than was NMES. While spatiotemporal gait parameters did not differ between groups, kinetic and kinematic studies may be useful to further understand the effects of quadriceps FES post-ACLR. The promising results of this preliminary investigation suggest that such studies are warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN 02817399. First posted June 29, 2016. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6626389 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66263892019-07-23 Functional electrical stimulation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized controlled pilot study Moran, Uria Gottlieb, Uri Gam, Arnon Springer, Shmuel J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: Inadequate quadriceps strength following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) often results in alterations in gait pattern that are usually reported during loading response. Neuro-muscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is frequently used to overcome this quadriceps weakness. Despite the beneficial effects of NMES, persistent deficits in strength and gait are reported. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of applying quadriceps functional electrical stimulation (FES) during walking in addition to standard rehabilitation, in the initial stage of ACLR rehabilitation. METHODS: Subjects were randomized to quadriceps FES synchronized with walking group (n = 10) or quadriceps NMES (duty cycle of 10 s on/10 s off) group (n = 13). Both interventions were performed for 10 min three days a week, in addition to a standard rehabilitation program. Assessments were performed up to 2 weeks before the ACLR (pre-ACLR), and 4 weeks postoperatively. Outcomes measured were gait speed, single limb stance gait symmetry, quadriceps isometric peak strength ratio (peak strength at 4 weeks/peak strength pre-ACLR) and peak strength inter-limb symmetry. Gait outcomes were also assessed 1-week post-surgery. RESULTS: Subjects in both groups regained pre-ACLR gait speed and symmetry after 4 weeks of rehabilitation, with no difference between groups. However, although pre-ACLR quadriceps peak strength was similar between groups (FES - 205 Nm, NMES − 225 Nm, p = 0.605), subjects in the FES group regained 82% of their pre-quadriceps strength compared to 47% in the NMES group (p = 0.02). In addition, after 4 weeks, the FES group had significantly better inter-limb strength symmetry 0.63 ± 0.15 vs. 0.39 ± 0.18 in the NMES group (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Quadriceps FES combined with traditional rehabilitation is a feasible, early intervention treatment option, post-ACLR. Furthermore, at 4 weeks post-surgery, FES was more effective in recovering quadriceps muscle strength than was NMES. While spatiotemporal gait parameters did not differ between groups, kinetic and kinematic studies may be useful to further understand the effects of quadriceps FES post-ACLR. The promising results of this preliminary investigation suggest that such studies are warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN 02817399. First posted June 29, 2016. BioMed Central 2019-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6626389/ /pubmed/31299999 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-019-0566-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Moran, Uria Gottlieb, Uri Gam, Arnon Springer, Shmuel Functional electrical stimulation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized controlled pilot study |
title | Functional electrical stimulation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized controlled pilot study |
title_full | Functional electrical stimulation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized controlled pilot study |
title_fullStr | Functional electrical stimulation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized controlled pilot study |
title_full_unstemmed | Functional electrical stimulation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized controlled pilot study |
title_short | Functional electrical stimulation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized controlled pilot study |
title_sort | functional electrical stimulation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized controlled pilot study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6626389/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31299999 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-019-0566-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moranuria functionalelectricalstimulationfollowinganteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionarandomizedcontrolledpilotstudy AT gottlieburi functionalelectricalstimulationfollowinganteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionarandomizedcontrolledpilotstudy AT gamarnon functionalelectricalstimulationfollowinganteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionarandomizedcontrolledpilotstudy AT springershmuel functionalelectricalstimulationfollowinganteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionarandomizedcontrolledpilotstudy |