Cargando…

Use of glatiramer acetate between 2010–2015: effectiveness, safety and reasons to start GA as first or second line treatment in Swiss multiple sclerosis patients

BACKGROUND: Glatiramer acetate (GA) is one of the first therapies approved for multiple sclerosis (MS). We prospectively included and monitored drug-naïve and pre-treated MS patients who had been prescribed GA for 1 year, to investigate reasons for GA prescription, its effectiveness and safety in re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zecca, Chiara, Disanto, Giulio, Sacco, Rosaria, Riccitelli, Gianna C., Gobbi, Claudio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6626416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31299922
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-019-1383-6
_version_ 1783434573814693888
author Zecca, Chiara
Disanto, Giulio
Sacco, Rosaria
Riccitelli, Gianna C.
Gobbi, Claudio
author_facet Zecca, Chiara
Disanto, Giulio
Sacco, Rosaria
Riccitelli, Gianna C.
Gobbi, Claudio
author_sort Zecca, Chiara
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Glatiramer acetate (GA) is one of the first therapies approved for multiple sclerosis (MS). We prospectively included and monitored drug-naïve and pre-treated MS patients who had been prescribed GA for 1 year, to investigate reasons for GA prescription, its effectiveness and safety in real life clinical practice. METHODS: One year, prospective, multicentre, observational study performed between 2010 and 2015 in consecutive MS and clinically isolated syndrome patients starting GA as a first (“naïve”) or second (“switcher”) line therapy. Primary endpoint was the annualized relapse rate (ARR) over 1 year of GA treatment (from baseline, V1, to 12 months, V2) in naïve and switchers compared to previous 24 months. Secondary endpoints were: EDSS changes between V1 and V2, frequency of adverse events, and reasons for prescribing and discontinuing GA. Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics were retrieved from medical records, and outcome measures were documented at V1 and V2, and in case of clinical worsening. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-four consecutive patients were monitored over 12 months (N = 64 naïve, N = 130 switchers). Side effect profile (naïve = 36%, switchers = 28%) and comorbidities (naïve = 31%, switchers = 15%) were the most frequent reasons to start GA. The ARR was reduced in both naïve and switchers during V1–2 as compared to the 24 months preceding V1 [naïve: 0.0 (0.0–0.0) vs 0.5 (0.5–1.0, p = 2.9e-10); switchers: 0.0 (0.0–0.0) vs 0.5 (0.0–0.5, p = 0.022)]. EDSS at V2 was significantly reduced only in naïve [(1.5 (1.0–2.5) vs 2.0 (1.5–2.5), p = 0.003)]. Naïve status and EDSS at V1 were negatively associated with EDSS change between V1-V2 in multivariable analysis (regression coefficient = − 0.436, p = 0.008, and regression coefficient = − 0.263, p = 6.18e-05, respectively). No new unexpected AE was reported. CONCLUSION: In our Swiss cohort, GA was prescribed mainly to naïve or switcher MS patients fearing interferon related side effects, with various comorbidities or considering pregnancy, and showed effectiveness and safety comparable with data of previous GA studies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12883-019-1383-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6626416
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66264162019-07-23 Use of glatiramer acetate between 2010–2015: effectiveness, safety and reasons to start GA as first or second line treatment in Swiss multiple sclerosis patients Zecca, Chiara Disanto, Giulio Sacco, Rosaria Riccitelli, Gianna C. Gobbi, Claudio BMC Neurol Research Article BACKGROUND: Glatiramer acetate (GA) is one of the first therapies approved for multiple sclerosis (MS). We prospectively included and monitored drug-naïve and pre-treated MS patients who had been prescribed GA for 1 year, to investigate reasons for GA prescription, its effectiveness and safety in real life clinical practice. METHODS: One year, prospective, multicentre, observational study performed between 2010 and 2015 in consecutive MS and clinically isolated syndrome patients starting GA as a first (“naïve”) or second (“switcher”) line therapy. Primary endpoint was the annualized relapse rate (ARR) over 1 year of GA treatment (from baseline, V1, to 12 months, V2) in naïve and switchers compared to previous 24 months. Secondary endpoints were: EDSS changes between V1 and V2, frequency of adverse events, and reasons for prescribing and discontinuing GA. Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics were retrieved from medical records, and outcome measures were documented at V1 and V2, and in case of clinical worsening. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-four consecutive patients were monitored over 12 months (N = 64 naïve, N = 130 switchers). Side effect profile (naïve = 36%, switchers = 28%) and comorbidities (naïve = 31%, switchers = 15%) were the most frequent reasons to start GA. The ARR was reduced in both naïve and switchers during V1–2 as compared to the 24 months preceding V1 [naïve: 0.0 (0.0–0.0) vs 0.5 (0.5–1.0, p = 2.9e-10); switchers: 0.0 (0.0–0.0) vs 0.5 (0.0–0.5, p = 0.022)]. EDSS at V2 was significantly reduced only in naïve [(1.5 (1.0–2.5) vs 2.0 (1.5–2.5), p = 0.003)]. Naïve status and EDSS at V1 were negatively associated with EDSS change between V1-V2 in multivariable analysis (regression coefficient = − 0.436, p = 0.008, and regression coefficient = − 0.263, p = 6.18e-05, respectively). No new unexpected AE was reported. CONCLUSION: In our Swiss cohort, GA was prescribed mainly to naïve or switcher MS patients fearing interferon related side effects, with various comorbidities or considering pregnancy, and showed effectiveness and safety comparable with data of previous GA studies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12883-019-1383-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6626416/ /pubmed/31299922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-019-1383-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zecca, Chiara
Disanto, Giulio
Sacco, Rosaria
Riccitelli, Gianna C.
Gobbi, Claudio
Use of glatiramer acetate between 2010–2015: effectiveness, safety and reasons to start GA as first or second line treatment in Swiss multiple sclerosis patients
title Use of glatiramer acetate between 2010–2015: effectiveness, safety and reasons to start GA as first or second line treatment in Swiss multiple sclerosis patients
title_full Use of glatiramer acetate between 2010–2015: effectiveness, safety and reasons to start GA as first or second line treatment in Swiss multiple sclerosis patients
title_fullStr Use of glatiramer acetate between 2010–2015: effectiveness, safety and reasons to start GA as first or second line treatment in Swiss multiple sclerosis patients
title_full_unstemmed Use of glatiramer acetate between 2010–2015: effectiveness, safety and reasons to start GA as first or second line treatment in Swiss multiple sclerosis patients
title_short Use of glatiramer acetate between 2010–2015: effectiveness, safety and reasons to start GA as first or second line treatment in Swiss multiple sclerosis patients
title_sort use of glatiramer acetate between 2010–2015: effectiveness, safety and reasons to start ga as first or second line treatment in swiss multiple sclerosis patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6626416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31299922
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-019-1383-6
work_keys_str_mv AT zeccachiara useofglatirameracetatebetween20102015effectivenesssafetyandreasonstostartgaasfirstorsecondlinetreatmentinswissmultiplesclerosispatients
AT disantogiulio useofglatirameracetatebetween20102015effectivenesssafetyandreasonstostartgaasfirstorsecondlinetreatmentinswissmultiplesclerosispatients
AT saccorosaria useofglatirameracetatebetween20102015effectivenesssafetyandreasonstostartgaasfirstorsecondlinetreatmentinswissmultiplesclerosispatients
AT riccitelligiannac useofglatirameracetatebetween20102015effectivenesssafetyandreasonstostartgaasfirstorsecondlinetreatmentinswissmultiplesclerosispatients
AT gobbiclaudio useofglatirameracetatebetween20102015effectivenesssafetyandreasonstostartgaasfirstorsecondlinetreatmentinswissmultiplesclerosispatients