Cargando…

How context affects implementation of the Primary Health Care approach: an analysis of what happened to primary health centres in India

INTRODUCTION: In this paper, we elucidate challenges posed by contexts to the implementation of the Primary Health Care (PHC) approach, using the example of primary health centres (rural peripheral health units) in India. We first present a historical review of ‘written’ policies in India—to underst...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramani, Sudha, Sivakami, Muthusamy, Gilson, Lucy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6626469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31354968
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001381
_version_ 1783434578274287616
author Ramani, Sudha
Sivakami, Muthusamy
Gilson, Lucy
author_facet Ramani, Sudha
Sivakami, Muthusamy
Gilson, Lucy
author_sort Ramani, Sudha
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In this paper, we elucidate challenges posed by contexts to the implementation of the Primary Health Care (PHC) approach, using the example of primary health centres (rural peripheral health units) in India. We first present a historical review of ‘written’ policies in India—to understand macro contextual influences on primary health centres. Then we highlight micro level issues at primary health centres using a contemporary case study. METHODS: To elucidate macro level factors, we reviewed seminal policy documents in India and some supporting literature. To examine the micro context, we worked with empirical qualitative data from a rural district in Maharashtra—collected through 12 community focus group discussions, 12 patient interviews and 34 interviews with health system staff. We interpret these findings using a combination of top–down and bottom–up lenses of the policy process. RESULTS: Primary health centres were originally envisaged as ‘social models’ of service delivery; front-line institutions that delivered integrated care close to people’s homes. However, macro issues of chronic underfunding and verticalisation have resulted in health centres with poor infrastructure, that mainly deliver vertical programmes. At micro levels, service provision at primary health centres is affected by doctors’ disinterest in primary care roles and an institutional context that promotes risk-averseness and disregard of outpatient care. Primary health centres do not meet community expectations in terms of services, drugs and attention provided; and hence, private practitioners are preferred. Thus, primary health centres today, despite having the structure of a primary-level care unit, no longer embody PHC ideals. CONCLUSIONS: This paper highlights some contextual complexities of implementing PHC—considering macro (pertaining to ideologies and fiscal priorities) and micro (pertaining to everyday behaviours and practices of actors) level issues. As we recommit to Alma-Ata, we must be cautious of the ceremonial adoption of interventions, that look like PHC—but cannot deliver on its ideals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6626469
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66264692019-07-28 How context affects implementation of the Primary Health Care approach: an analysis of what happened to primary health centres in India Ramani, Sudha Sivakami, Muthusamy Gilson, Lucy BMJ Glob Health Research INTRODUCTION: In this paper, we elucidate challenges posed by contexts to the implementation of the Primary Health Care (PHC) approach, using the example of primary health centres (rural peripheral health units) in India. We first present a historical review of ‘written’ policies in India—to understand macro contextual influences on primary health centres. Then we highlight micro level issues at primary health centres using a contemporary case study. METHODS: To elucidate macro level factors, we reviewed seminal policy documents in India and some supporting literature. To examine the micro context, we worked with empirical qualitative data from a rural district in Maharashtra—collected through 12 community focus group discussions, 12 patient interviews and 34 interviews with health system staff. We interpret these findings using a combination of top–down and bottom–up lenses of the policy process. RESULTS: Primary health centres were originally envisaged as ‘social models’ of service delivery; front-line institutions that delivered integrated care close to people’s homes. However, macro issues of chronic underfunding and verticalisation have resulted in health centres with poor infrastructure, that mainly deliver vertical programmes. At micro levels, service provision at primary health centres is affected by doctors’ disinterest in primary care roles and an institutional context that promotes risk-averseness and disregard of outpatient care. Primary health centres do not meet community expectations in terms of services, drugs and attention provided; and hence, private practitioners are preferred. Thus, primary health centres today, despite having the structure of a primary-level care unit, no longer embody PHC ideals. CONCLUSIONS: This paper highlights some contextual complexities of implementing PHC—considering macro (pertaining to ideologies and fiscal priorities) and micro (pertaining to everyday behaviours and practices of actors) level issues. As we recommit to Alma-Ata, we must be cautious of the ceremonial adoption of interventions, that look like PHC—but cannot deliver on its ideals. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6626469/ /pubmed/31354968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001381 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Ramani, Sudha
Sivakami, Muthusamy
Gilson, Lucy
How context affects implementation of the Primary Health Care approach: an analysis of what happened to primary health centres in India
title How context affects implementation of the Primary Health Care approach: an analysis of what happened to primary health centres in India
title_full How context affects implementation of the Primary Health Care approach: an analysis of what happened to primary health centres in India
title_fullStr How context affects implementation of the Primary Health Care approach: an analysis of what happened to primary health centres in India
title_full_unstemmed How context affects implementation of the Primary Health Care approach: an analysis of what happened to primary health centres in India
title_short How context affects implementation of the Primary Health Care approach: an analysis of what happened to primary health centres in India
title_sort how context affects implementation of the primary health care approach: an analysis of what happened to primary health centres in india
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6626469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31354968
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001381
work_keys_str_mv AT ramanisudha howcontextaffectsimplementationoftheprimaryhealthcareapproachananalysisofwhathappenedtoprimaryhealthcentresinindia
AT sivakamimuthusamy howcontextaffectsimplementationoftheprimaryhealthcareapproachananalysisofwhathappenedtoprimaryhealthcentresinindia
AT gilsonlucy howcontextaffectsimplementationoftheprimaryhealthcareapproachananalysisofwhathappenedtoprimaryhealthcentresinindia