Cargando…

Relative wealth, subjective social status, and their associations with depression: Cross-sectional, population-based study in rural Uganda

Depression is a leading cause of disability worldwide, and has been found to be a consistent correlate of socioeconomic status (SES). The relative deprivation hypothesis proposes that one mechanism linking SES to health involves social comparisons, suggesting that relative SES rather than absolute S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Meghan L., Kakuhikire, Bernard, Baguma, Charles, Rasmussen, Justin D., Perkins, Jessica M., Cooper-Vince, Christine, Venkataramani, Atheendar S., Ashaba, Scholastic, Bangsberg, David R., Tsai, Alexander C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6626875/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31338411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100448
_version_ 1783434610694160384
author Smith, Meghan L.
Kakuhikire, Bernard
Baguma, Charles
Rasmussen, Justin D.
Perkins, Jessica M.
Cooper-Vince, Christine
Venkataramani, Atheendar S.
Ashaba, Scholastic
Bangsberg, David R.
Tsai, Alexander C.
author_facet Smith, Meghan L.
Kakuhikire, Bernard
Baguma, Charles
Rasmussen, Justin D.
Perkins, Jessica M.
Cooper-Vince, Christine
Venkataramani, Atheendar S.
Ashaba, Scholastic
Bangsberg, David R.
Tsai, Alexander C.
author_sort Smith, Meghan L.
collection PubMed
description Depression is a leading cause of disability worldwide, and has been found to be a consistent correlate of socioeconomic status (SES). The relative deprivation hypothesis proposes that one mechanism linking SES to health involves social comparisons, suggesting that relative SES rather than absolute SES is of primary importance in determining health status. Using data from a whole-population sample of 1,620 participants residing in rural southwestern Uganda, we estimated the independent associations between objective and subjective relative wealth and probable depression, as measured by the depression subscale of the Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCLD). Objective relative wealth was measured by an asset index based on information about housing characteristics and household possessions, which was used to rank study participants into quintiles (within each village) of relative household asset wealth. Subjective relative wealth was measured by a single question asking participants to rate their wealth, on a 5-point Likert scale, relative to others in their village. Within the population, 460 study participants (28.4%) screened positive for probable depression. Using Poisson regression with cluster-robust error variance, we found that subjective relative wealth was associated with probable depression, adjusting for objective relative wealth and other covariates (adjusted relative risk [aRR] comparing lowest vs. highest level of subjective relative wealth = 1.90, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.18, 3.06). Objective relative wealth was not associated with probable depression (aRR comparing lowest vs. highest quintile of objective relative wealth = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.77, 1.55). These results suggest that, in this context, subjective relative wealth is a stronger correlate of mental health status compared with objective relative wealth. Our findings are potentially consistent with the relative deprivation hypothesis, but more research is needed to explain how relative differences in wealth are (accurately or inaccurately) perceived and to elucidate the implications of these perceptions for health outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6626875
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66268752019-07-23 Relative wealth, subjective social status, and their associations with depression: Cross-sectional, population-based study in rural Uganda Smith, Meghan L. Kakuhikire, Bernard Baguma, Charles Rasmussen, Justin D. Perkins, Jessica M. Cooper-Vince, Christine Venkataramani, Atheendar S. Ashaba, Scholastic Bangsberg, David R. Tsai, Alexander C. SSM Popul Health Article Depression is a leading cause of disability worldwide, and has been found to be a consistent correlate of socioeconomic status (SES). The relative deprivation hypothesis proposes that one mechanism linking SES to health involves social comparisons, suggesting that relative SES rather than absolute SES is of primary importance in determining health status. Using data from a whole-population sample of 1,620 participants residing in rural southwestern Uganda, we estimated the independent associations between objective and subjective relative wealth and probable depression, as measured by the depression subscale of the Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCLD). Objective relative wealth was measured by an asset index based on information about housing characteristics and household possessions, which was used to rank study participants into quintiles (within each village) of relative household asset wealth. Subjective relative wealth was measured by a single question asking participants to rate their wealth, on a 5-point Likert scale, relative to others in their village. Within the population, 460 study participants (28.4%) screened positive for probable depression. Using Poisson regression with cluster-robust error variance, we found that subjective relative wealth was associated with probable depression, adjusting for objective relative wealth and other covariates (adjusted relative risk [aRR] comparing lowest vs. highest level of subjective relative wealth = 1.90, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.18, 3.06). Objective relative wealth was not associated with probable depression (aRR comparing lowest vs. highest quintile of objective relative wealth = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.77, 1.55). These results suggest that, in this context, subjective relative wealth is a stronger correlate of mental health status compared with objective relative wealth. Our findings are potentially consistent with the relative deprivation hypothesis, but more research is needed to explain how relative differences in wealth are (accurately or inaccurately) perceived and to elucidate the implications of these perceptions for health outcomes. Elsevier 2019-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6626875/ /pubmed/31338411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100448 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Smith, Meghan L.
Kakuhikire, Bernard
Baguma, Charles
Rasmussen, Justin D.
Perkins, Jessica M.
Cooper-Vince, Christine
Venkataramani, Atheendar S.
Ashaba, Scholastic
Bangsberg, David R.
Tsai, Alexander C.
Relative wealth, subjective social status, and their associations with depression: Cross-sectional, population-based study in rural Uganda
title Relative wealth, subjective social status, and their associations with depression: Cross-sectional, population-based study in rural Uganda
title_full Relative wealth, subjective social status, and their associations with depression: Cross-sectional, population-based study in rural Uganda
title_fullStr Relative wealth, subjective social status, and their associations with depression: Cross-sectional, population-based study in rural Uganda
title_full_unstemmed Relative wealth, subjective social status, and their associations with depression: Cross-sectional, population-based study in rural Uganda
title_short Relative wealth, subjective social status, and their associations with depression: Cross-sectional, population-based study in rural Uganda
title_sort relative wealth, subjective social status, and their associations with depression: cross-sectional, population-based study in rural uganda
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6626875/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31338411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100448
work_keys_str_mv AT smithmeghanl relativewealthsubjectivesocialstatusandtheirassociationswithdepressioncrosssectionalpopulationbasedstudyinruraluganda
AT kakuhikirebernard relativewealthsubjectivesocialstatusandtheirassociationswithdepressioncrosssectionalpopulationbasedstudyinruraluganda
AT bagumacharles relativewealthsubjectivesocialstatusandtheirassociationswithdepressioncrosssectionalpopulationbasedstudyinruraluganda
AT rasmussenjustind relativewealthsubjectivesocialstatusandtheirassociationswithdepressioncrosssectionalpopulationbasedstudyinruraluganda
AT perkinsjessicam relativewealthsubjectivesocialstatusandtheirassociationswithdepressioncrosssectionalpopulationbasedstudyinruraluganda
AT coopervincechristine relativewealthsubjectivesocialstatusandtheirassociationswithdepressioncrosssectionalpopulationbasedstudyinruraluganda
AT venkataramaniatheendars relativewealthsubjectivesocialstatusandtheirassociationswithdepressioncrosssectionalpopulationbasedstudyinruraluganda
AT ashabascholastic relativewealthsubjectivesocialstatusandtheirassociationswithdepressioncrosssectionalpopulationbasedstudyinruraluganda
AT bangsbergdavidr relativewealthsubjectivesocialstatusandtheirassociationswithdepressioncrosssectionalpopulationbasedstudyinruraluganda
AT tsaialexanderc relativewealthsubjectivesocialstatusandtheirassociationswithdepressioncrosssectionalpopulationbasedstudyinruraluganda