Cargando…

Discrepancy of glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 autoantibody results between RSR radioimmunoassay and enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay in patients with type 1 diabetes is related to autoantibody affinity

AIM/INTRODUCTION: Autoantibodies to the 65 kDa isoform of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GADA) are a valuable diagnostic and predictive marker for type 1 diabetes. Recently, it has been reported that a significant proportion of sera in the commercial RSR radioimmunoassay (RIA) that have tested positiv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kawasaki, Eiji, Okada, Akira, Uchida, Aira, Fukuyama, Takahiro, Sagara, Yoko, Nakano, Yuko, Tamai, Hidekazu, Tojikubo, Masayuki, Koga, Nobuhiko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6626941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30582775
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdi.12996
_version_ 1783434626422800384
author Kawasaki, Eiji
Okada, Akira
Uchida, Aira
Fukuyama, Takahiro
Sagara, Yoko
Nakano, Yuko
Tamai, Hidekazu
Tojikubo, Masayuki
Koga, Nobuhiko
author_facet Kawasaki, Eiji
Okada, Akira
Uchida, Aira
Fukuyama, Takahiro
Sagara, Yoko
Nakano, Yuko
Tamai, Hidekazu
Tojikubo, Masayuki
Koga, Nobuhiko
author_sort Kawasaki, Eiji
collection PubMed
description AIM/INTRODUCTION: Autoantibodies to the 65 kDa isoform of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GADA) are a valuable diagnostic and predictive marker for type 1 diabetes. Recently, it has been reported that a significant proportion of sera in the commercial RSR radioimmunoassay (RIA) that have tested positive for GADA have then turned negative in RSR enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) tests in patients with type 1 diabetes. The present study aimed to investigate whether the GADA result discrepancies between RSR‐RIA and RSR‐ELISA are related to autoantibody affinity. METHODS: GADA affinity was measured by a competitive binding experiment using unlabeled recombinant human GAD65 in 12 discordant samples (5 RIA[+]/ELISA[−] and 7 RIA[−]/ELISA[+] sera). Furthermore, the effect of the initial incubation time on the GADA positivity was also examined using the ELISA test. RESULTS: GADA affinities were >10(10) L/mol in two of five RIA(+)/ELISA(−) and all of seven RIA(−)/ELISA(+) sera. After an initial incubation time longer than the recommended 1 h, the GADA titer in three of five RIA(+)/ELISA(−) sera and all RIA(−)/ELISA(+) sera increased 1.6‐ to 100‐fold. However, the titer in 12 GADA‐negative sera from healthy controls remained unchanged after the longer incubation. The increment ratio of GADA titer was positively correlated with GADA affinity (r = 0.991, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The RSR‐RIA test identifies both high‐ and low‐affinity GADA, whereas the RSR‐ELISA test identifies only high‐affinity GADA. A longer initial incubation time in the RSR‐ELISA test increases the sensitivity of GADA with the same specificity in patients with type 1 diabetes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6626941
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66269412019-07-17 Discrepancy of glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 autoantibody results between RSR radioimmunoassay and enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay in patients with type 1 diabetes is related to autoantibody affinity Kawasaki, Eiji Okada, Akira Uchida, Aira Fukuyama, Takahiro Sagara, Yoko Nakano, Yuko Tamai, Hidekazu Tojikubo, Masayuki Koga, Nobuhiko J Diabetes Investig Articles AIM/INTRODUCTION: Autoantibodies to the 65 kDa isoform of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GADA) are a valuable diagnostic and predictive marker for type 1 diabetes. Recently, it has been reported that a significant proportion of sera in the commercial RSR radioimmunoassay (RIA) that have tested positive for GADA have then turned negative in RSR enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) tests in patients with type 1 diabetes. The present study aimed to investigate whether the GADA result discrepancies between RSR‐RIA and RSR‐ELISA are related to autoantibody affinity. METHODS: GADA affinity was measured by a competitive binding experiment using unlabeled recombinant human GAD65 in 12 discordant samples (5 RIA[+]/ELISA[−] and 7 RIA[−]/ELISA[+] sera). Furthermore, the effect of the initial incubation time on the GADA positivity was also examined using the ELISA test. RESULTS: GADA affinities were >10(10) L/mol in two of five RIA(+)/ELISA(−) and all of seven RIA(−)/ELISA(+) sera. After an initial incubation time longer than the recommended 1 h, the GADA titer in three of five RIA(+)/ELISA(−) sera and all RIA(−)/ELISA(+) sera increased 1.6‐ to 100‐fold. However, the titer in 12 GADA‐negative sera from healthy controls remained unchanged after the longer incubation. The increment ratio of GADA titer was positively correlated with GADA affinity (r = 0.991, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The RSR‐RIA test identifies both high‐ and low‐affinity GADA, whereas the RSR‐ELISA test identifies only high‐affinity GADA. A longer initial incubation time in the RSR‐ELISA test increases the sensitivity of GADA with the same specificity in patients with type 1 diabetes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-01-25 2019-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6626941/ /pubmed/30582775 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdi.12996 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Diabetes Investigation published by Asian Association for the Study of Diabetes (AASD) and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Articles
Kawasaki, Eiji
Okada, Akira
Uchida, Aira
Fukuyama, Takahiro
Sagara, Yoko
Nakano, Yuko
Tamai, Hidekazu
Tojikubo, Masayuki
Koga, Nobuhiko
Discrepancy of glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 autoantibody results between RSR radioimmunoassay and enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay in patients with type 1 diabetes is related to autoantibody affinity
title Discrepancy of glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 autoantibody results between RSR radioimmunoassay and enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay in patients with type 1 diabetes is related to autoantibody affinity
title_full Discrepancy of glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 autoantibody results between RSR radioimmunoassay and enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay in patients with type 1 diabetes is related to autoantibody affinity
title_fullStr Discrepancy of glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 autoantibody results between RSR radioimmunoassay and enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay in patients with type 1 diabetes is related to autoantibody affinity
title_full_unstemmed Discrepancy of glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 autoantibody results between RSR radioimmunoassay and enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay in patients with type 1 diabetes is related to autoantibody affinity
title_short Discrepancy of glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 autoantibody results between RSR radioimmunoassay and enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay in patients with type 1 diabetes is related to autoantibody affinity
title_sort discrepancy of glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 autoantibody results between rsr radioimmunoassay and enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay in patients with type 1 diabetes is related to autoantibody affinity
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6626941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30582775
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdi.12996
work_keys_str_mv AT kawasakieiji discrepancyofglutamicaciddecarboxylase65autoantibodyresultsbetweenrsrradioimmunoassayandenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassayinpatientswithtype1diabetesisrelatedtoautoantibodyaffinity
AT okadaakira discrepancyofglutamicaciddecarboxylase65autoantibodyresultsbetweenrsrradioimmunoassayandenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassayinpatientswithtype1diabetesisrelatedtoautoantibodyaffinity
AT uchidaaira discrepancyofglutamicaciddecarboxylase65autoantibodyresultsbetweenrsrradioimmunoassayandenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassayinpatientswithtype1diabetesisrelatedtoautoantibodyaffinity
AT fukuyamatakahiro discrepancyofglutamicaciddecarboxylase65autoantibodyresultsbetweenrsrradioimmunoassayandenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassayinpatientswithtype1diabetesisrelatedtoautoantibodyaffinity
AT sagarayoko discrepancyofglutamicaciddecarboxylase65autoantibodyresultsbetweenrsrradioimmunoassayandenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassayinpatientswithtype1diabetesisrelatedtoautoantibodyaffinity
AT nakanoyuko discrepancyofglutamicaciddecarboxylase65autoantibodyresultsbetweenrsrradioimmunoassayandenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassayinpatientswithtype1diabetesisrelatedtoautoantibodyaffinity
AT tamaihidekazu discrepancyofglutamicaciddecarboxylase65autoantibodyresultsbetweenrsrradioimmunoassayandenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassayinpatientswithtype1diabetesisrelatedtoautoantibodyaffinity
AT tojikubomasayuki discrepancyofglutamicaciddecarboxylase65autoantibodyresultsbetweenrsrradioimmunoassayandenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassayinpatientswithtype1diabetesisrelatedtoautoantibodyaffinity
AT koganobuhiko discrepancyofglutamicaciddecarboxylase65autoantibodyresultsbetweenrsrradioimmunoassayandenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassayinpatientswithtype1diabetesisrelatedtoautoantibodyaffinity