Cargando…

ERP Evidence for Co-Activation of English Words during Recognition of American Sign Language Signs

Event-related potentials (ERPs) were used to investigate co-activation of English words during recognition of American Sign Language (ASL) signs. Deaf and hearing signers viewed pairs of ASL signs and judged their semantic relatedness. Half of the semantically unrelated signs had English translation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Brittany, Meade, Gabriela, Midgley, Katherine J., Holcomb, Phillip J., Emmorey, Karen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6627215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31234356
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci9060148
_version_ 1783434687284248576
author Lee, Brittany
Meade, Gabriela
Midgley, Katherine J.
Holcomb, Phillip J.
Emmorey, Karen
author_facet Lee, Brittany
Meade, Gabriela
Midgley, Katherine J.
Holcomb, Phillip J.
Emmorey, Karen
author_sort Lee, Brittany
collection PubMed
description Event-related potentials (ERPs) were used to investigate co-activation of English words during recognition of American Sign Language (ASL) signs. Deaf and hearing signers viewed pairs of ASL signs and judged their semantic relatedness. Half of the semantically unrelated signs had English translations that shared an orthographic and phonological rime (e.g., BAR–STAR) and half did not (e.g., NURSE–STAR). Classic N400 and behavioral semantic priming effects were observed in both groups. For hearing signers, targets in sign pairs with English rime translations elicited a smaller N400 compared to targets in pairs with unrelated English translations. In contrast, a reversed N400 effect was observed for deaf signers: target signs in English rime translation pairs elicited a larger N400 compared to targets in pairs with unrelated English translations. This reversed effect was overtaken by a later, more typical ERP priming effect for deaf signers who were aware of the manipulation. These findings provide evidence that implicit language co-activation in bimodal bilinguals is bidirectional. However, the distinct pattern of effects in deaf and hearing signers suggests that it may be modulated by differences in language proficiency and dominance as well as by asymmetric reliance on orthographic versus phonological representations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6627215
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66272152019-07-19 ERP Evidence for Co-Activation of English Words during Recognition of American Sign Language Signs Lee, Brittany Meade, Gabriela Midgley, Katherine J. Holcomb, Phillip J. Emmorey, Karen Brain Sci Article Event-related potentials (ERPs) were used to investigate co-activation of English words during recognition of American Sign Language (ASL) signs. Deaf and hearing signers viewed pairs of ASL signs and judged their semantic relatedness. Half of the semantically unrelated signs had English translations that shared an orthographic and phonological rime (e.g., BAR–STAR) and half did not (e.g., NURSE–STAR). Classic N400 and behavioral semantic priming effects were observed in both groups. For hearing signers, targets in sign pairs with English rime translations elicited a smaller N400 compared to targets in pairs with unrelated English translations. In contrast, a reversed N400 effect was observed for deaf signers: target signs in English rime translation pairs elicited a larger N400 compared to targets in pairs with unrelated English translations. This reversed effect was overtaken by a later, more typical ERP priming effect for deaf signers who were aware of the manipulation. These findings provide evidence that implicit language co-activation in bimodal bilinguals is bidirectional. However, the distinct pattern of effects in deaf and hearing signers suggests that it may be modulated by differences in language proficiency and dominance as well as by asymmetric reliance on orthographic versus phonological representations. MDPI 2019-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6627215/ /pubmed/31234356 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci9060148 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lee, Brittany
Meade, Gabriela
Midgley, Katherine J.
Holcomb, Phillip J.
Emmorey, Karen
ERP Evidence for Co-Activation of English Words during Recognition of American Sign Language Signs
title ERP Evidence for Co-Activation of English Words during Recognition of American Sign Language Signs
title_full ERP Evidence for Co-Activation of English Words during Recognition of American Sign Language Signs
title_fullStr ERP Evidence for Co-Activation of English Words during Recognition of American Sign Language Signs
title_full_unstemmed ERP Evidence for Co-Activation of English Words during Recognition of American Sign Language Signs
title_short ERP Evidence for Co-Activation of English Words during Recognition of American Sign Language Signs
title_sort erp evidence for co-activation of english words during recognition of american sign language signs
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6627215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31234356
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci9060148
work_keys_str_mv AT leebrittany erpevidenceforcoactivationofenglishwordsduringrecognitionofamericansignlanguagesigns
AT meadegabriela erpevidenceforcoactivationofenglishwordsduringrecognitionofamericansignlanguagesigns
AT midgleykatherinej erpevidenceforcoactivationofenglishwordsduringrecognitionofamericansignlanguagesigns
AT holcombphillipj erpevidenceforcoactivationofenglishwordsduringrecognitionofamericansignlanguagesigns
AT emmoreykaren erpevidenceforcoactivationofenglishwordsduringrecognitionofamericansignlanguagesigns