Cargando…
ERP Evidence for Co-Activation of English Words during Recognition of American Sign Language Signs
Event-related potentials (ERPs) were used to investigate co-activation of English words during recognition of American Sign Language (ASL) signs. Deaf and hearing signers viewed pairs of ASL signs and judged their semantic relatedness. Half of the semantically unrelated signs had English translation...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6627215/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31234356 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci9060148 |
_version_ | 1783434687284248576 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Brittany Meade, Gabriela Midgley, Katherine J. Holcomb, Phillip J. Emmorey, Karen |
author_facet | Lee, Brittany Meade, Gabriela Midgley, Katherine J. Holcomb, Phillip J. Emmorey, Karen |
author_sort | Lee, Brittany |
collection | PubMed |
description | Event-related potentials (ERPs) were used to investigate co-activation of English words during recognition of American Sign Language (ASL) signs. Deaf and hearing signers viewed pairs of ASL signs and judged their semantic relatedness. Half of the semantically unrelated signs had English translations that shared an orthographic and phonological rime (e.g., BAR–STAR) and half did not (e.g., NURSE–STAR). Classic N400 and behavioral semantic priming effects were observed in both groups. For hearing signers, targets in sign pairs with English rime translations elicited a smaller N400 compared to targets in pairs with unrelated English translations. In contrast, a reversed N400 effect was observed for deaf signers: target signs in English rime translation pairs elicited a larger N400 compared to targets in pairs with unrelated English translations. This reversed effect was overtaken by a later, more typical ERP priming effect for deaf signers who were aware of the manipulation. These findings provide evidence that implicit language co-activation in bimodal bilinguals is bidirectional. However, the distinct pattern of effects in deaf and hearing signers suggests that it may be modulated by differences in language proficiency and dominance as well as by asymmetric reliance on orthographic versus phonological representations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6627215 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66272152019-07-19 ERP Evidence for Co-Activation of English Words during Recognition of American Sign Language Signs Lee, Brittany Meade, Gabriela Midgley, Katherine J. Holcomb, Phillip J. Emmorey, Karen Brain Sci Article Event-related potentials (ERPs) were used to investigate co-activation of English words during recognition of American Sign Language (ASL) signs. Deaf and hearing signers viewed pairs of ASL signs and judged their semantic relatedness. Half of the semantically unrelated signs had English translations that shared an orthographic and phonological rime (e.g., BAR–STAR) and half did not (e.g., NURSE–STAR). Classic N400 and behavioral semantic priming effects were observed in both groups. For hearing signers, targets in sign pairs with English rime translations elicited a smaller N400 compared to targets in pairs with unrelated English translations. In contrast, a reversed N400 effect was observed for deaf signers: target signs in English rime translation pairs elicited a larger N400 compared to targets in pairs with unrelated English translations. This reversed effect was overtaken by a later, more typical ERP priming effect for deaf signers who were aware of the manipulation. These findings provide evidence that implicit language co-activation in bimodal bilinguals is bidirectional. However, the distinct pattern of effects in deaf and hearing signers suggests that it may be modulated by differences in language proficiency and dominance as well as by asymmetric reliance on orthographic versus phonological representations. MDPI 2019-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6627215/ /pubmed/31234356 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci9060148 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Lee, Brittany Meade, Gabriela Midgley, Katherine J. Holcomb, Phillip J. Emmorey, Karen ERP Evidence for Co-Activation of English Words during Recognition of American Sign Language Signs |
title | ERP Evidence for Co-Activation of English Words during Recognition of American Sign Language Signs |
title_full | ERP Evidence for Co-Activation of English Words during Recognition of American Sign Language Signs |
title_fullStr | ERP Evidence for Co-Activation of English Words during Recognition of American Sign Language Signs |
title_full_unstemmed | ERP Evidence for Co-Activation of English Words during Recognition of American Sign Language Signs |
title_short | ERP Evidence for Co-Activation of English Words during Recognition of American Sign Language Signs |
title_sort | erp evidence for co-activation of english words during recognition of american sign language signs |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6627215/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31234356 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci9060148 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leebrittany erpevidenceforcoactivationofenglishwordsduringrecognitionofamericansignlanguagesigns AT meadegabriela erpevidenceforcoactivationofenglishwordsduringrecognitionofamericansignlanguagesigns AT midgleykatherinej erpevidenceforcoactivationofenglishwordsduringrecognitionofamericansignlanguagesigns AT holcombphillipj erpevidenceforcoactivationofenglishwordsduringrecognitionofamericansignlanguagesigns AT emmoreykaren erpevidenceforcoactivationofenglishwordsduringrecognitionofamericansignlanguagesigns |