Cargando…

Mechanisms behind Temsirolimus Resistance Causing Reactivated Growth and Invasive Behavior of Bladder Cancer Cells In Vitro

Background: Although mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, such as temsirolimus, show promise in treating bladder cancer, acquired resistance often hampers efficacy. This study evaluates mechanisms leading to resistance. Methods: Cell growth, proliferation, cell cycle phases, and cell c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Juengel, Eva, Natsheh, Iyad, Najafi, Ramin, Rutz, Jochen, Tsaur, Igor, Haferkamp, Axel, Chun, Felix K.-H., Blaheta, Roman A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6627393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31167517
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11060777
_version_ 1783434727957463040
author Juengel, Eva
Natsheh, Iyad
Najafi, Ramin
Rutz, Jochen
Tsaur, Igor
Haferkamp, Axel
Chun, Felix K.-H.
Blaheta, Roman A.
author_facet Juengel, Eva
Natsheh, Iyad
Najafi, Ramin
Rutz, Jochen
Tsaur, Igor
Haferkamp, Axel
Chun, Felix K.-H.
Blaheta, Roman A.
author_sort Juengel, Eva
collection PubMed
description Background: Although mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, such as temsirolimus, show promise in treating bladder cancer, acquired resistance often hampers efficacy. This study evaluates mechanisms leading to resistance. Methods: Cell growth, proliferation, cell cycle phases, and cell cycle regulating proteins were compared in temsirolimus resistant (res) and sensitive (parental—par) RT112 and UMUC3 bladder cancer cells. To evaluate invasive behavior, adhesion to vascular endothelium or to immobilized extracellular matrix proteins and chemotactic activity were examined. Integrin α and β subtypes were analyzed and blocking was done to evaluate physiologic integrin relevance. Results: Growth of RT112res could no longer be restrained by temsirolimus and was even enhanced in UMUC3res, accompanied by accumulation in the S- and G2/M-phase. Proteins of the cdk-cyclin and Akt-mTOR axis increased, whereas p19, p27, p53, and p73 decreased in resistant cells treated with low-dosed temsirolimus. Chemotactic activity of RT112res/UMUC3res was elevated following temsirolimus re-exposure, along with significant integrin α2, α3, and β1 alterations. Blocking revealed a functional switch of the integrins, driving the resistant cells from being adhesive to being highly motile. Conclusion: Temsirolimus resistance is associated with reactivation of bladder cancer growth and invasive behavior. The α2, α3, and β1 integrins could be attractive treatment targets to hinder temsirolimus resistance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6627393
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66273932019-07-23 Mechanisms behind Temsirolimus Resistance Causing Reactivated Growth and Invasive Behavior of Bladder Cancer Cells In Vitro Juengel, Eva Natsheh, Iyad Najafi, Ramin Rutz, Jochen Tsaur, Igor Haferkamp, Axel Chun, Felix K.-H. Blaheta, Roman A. Cancers (Basel) Article Background: Although mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, such as temsirolimus, show promise in treating bladder cancer, acquired resistance often hampers efficacy. This study evaluates mechanisms leading to resistance. Methods: Cell growth, proliferation, cell cycle phases, and cell cycle regulating proteins were compared in temsirolimus resistant (res) and sensitive (parental—par) RT112 and UMUC3 bladder cancer cells. To evaluate invasive behavior, adhesion to vascular endothelium or to immobilized extracellular matrix proteins and chemotactic activity were examined. Integrin α and β subtypes were analyzed and blocking was done to evaluate physiologic integrin relevance. Results: Growth of RT112res could no longer be restrained by temsirolimus and was even enhanced in UMUC3res, accompanied by accumulation in the S- and G2/M-phase. Proteins of the cdk-cyclin and Akt-mTOR axis increased, whereas p19, p27, p53, and p73 decreased in resistant cells treated with low-dosed temsirolimus. Chemotactic activity of RT112res/UMUC3res was elevated following temsirolimus re-exposure, along with significant integrin α2, α3, and β1 alterations. Blocking revealed a functional switch of the integrins, driving the resistant cells from being adhesive to being highly motile. Conclusion: Temsirolimus resistance is associated with reactivation of bladder cancer growth and invasive behavior. The α2, α3, and β1 integrins could be attractive treatment targets to hinder temsirolimus resistance. MDPI 2019-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6627393/ /pubmed/31167517 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11060777 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Juengel, Eva
Natsheh, Iyad
Najafi, Ramin
Rutz, Jochen
Tsaur, Igor
Haferkamp, Axel
Chun, Felix K.-H.
Blaheta, Roman A.
Mechanisms behind Temsirolimus Resistance Causing Reactivated Growth and Invasive Behavior of Bladder Cancer Cells In Vitro
title Mechanisms behind Temsirolimus Resistance Causing Reactivated Growth and Invasive Behavior of Bladder Cancer Cells In Vitro
title_full Mechanisms behind Temsirolimus Resistance Causing Reactivated Growth and Invasive Behavior of Bladder Cancer Cells In Vitro
title_fullStr Mechanisms behind Temsirolimus Resistance Causing Reactivated Growth and Invasive Behavior of Bladder Cancer Cells In Vitro
title_full_unstemmed Mechanisms behind Temsirolimus Resistance Causing Reactivated Growth and Invasive Behavior of Bladder Cancer Cells In Vitro
title_short Mechanisms behind Temsirolimus Resistance Causing Reactivated Growth and Invasive Behavior of Bladder Cancer Cells In Vitro
title_sort mechanisms behind temsirolimus resistance causing reactivated growth and invasive behavior of bladder cancer cells in vitro
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6627393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31167517
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11060777
work_keys_str_mv AT juengeleva mechanismsbehindtemsirolimusresistancecausingreactivatedgrowthandinvasivebehaviorofbladdercancercellsinvitro
AT natshehiyad mechanismsbehindtemsirolimusresistancecausingreactivatedgrowthandinvasivebehaviorofbladdercancercellsinvitro
AT najafiramin mechanismsbehindtemsirolimusresistancecausingreactivatedgrowthandinvasivebehaviorofbladdercancercellsinvitro
AT rutzjochen mechanismsbehindtemsirolimusresistancecausingreactivatedgrowthandinvasivebehaviorofbladdercancercellsinvitro
AT tsaurigor mechanismsbehindtemsirolimusresistancecausingreactivatedgrowthandinvasivebehaviorofbladdercancercellsinvitro
AT haferkampaxel mechanismsbehindtemsirolimusresistancecausingreactivatedgrowthandinvasivebehaviorofbladdercancercellsinvitro
AT chunfelixkh mechanismsbehindtemsirolimusresistancecausingreactivatedgrowthandinvasivebehaviorofbladdercancercellsinvitro
AT blahetaromana mechanismsbehindtemsirolimusresistancecausingreactivatedgrowthandinvasivebehaviorofbladdercancercellsinvitro