Solid Indeterminate Pulmonary Nodules of Less Than 300 mm(3): Application of Different Volume Doubling Time Cut-offs in Clinical Practice

In the British Thoracic Society guidelines for incidental pulmonary nodules, volumetric analysis has become the recommended method for growth assessment in solid indeterminate pulmonary nodules (SIPNs) <300 mm(3). In these guidelines, two different volume doubling time (VDT) cut-offs, 400 and 600 days, were proposed to differentiate benign from malignant nodules. The present study aims to evaluate the performance of these VDT cut-offs in a group of SIPNs <300 mm(3) which were incidentally detected in a routine clinical setting. During a 7-year period, we retrospectively selected 60 patients with a single SIPN <300 mm(3). For each SIPN, the volume and VDT were calculated using semiautomatic software throughout the follow-up period, and the performance of the 400- and 600-day VDT cut-offs was compared. In the selected sample, there were 38 benign and 22 malignant nodules. In this group of nodules, the sensitivity, negative predictive value and accuracy of the 600-day VDT cut-off were higher than those of the 400-day VDT cut-off. Therefore, in the management of SIPNs <300 mm(3) which were incidentally detected in a clinical setting, the 600-day VDT cut-off was better at differentiating benign from malignant nodules than the 400-day VDT cut-off, by reducing the number of false negatives.