Cargando…

Advancing Risk Assessment of Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer Patients

The individual risk to progression is unclear for intermediate risk prostate cancer patients. To assess their risk to progression, we examined the level of genomic instability in circulating tumor cells (CTCs) using quantitative three-dimensional (3D) telomere analysis. Data of CTCs from 65 treatmen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Drachenberg, Darrel, Awe, Julius A., Rangel Pozzo, Aline, Saranchuk, Jeff, Mai, Sabine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6627662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31226731
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11060855
_version_ 1783434789256167424
author Drachenberg, Darrel
Awe, Julius A.
Rangel Pozzo, Aline
Saranchuk, Jeff
Mai, Sabine
author_facet Drachenberg, Darrel
Awe, Julius A.
Rangel Pozzo, Aline
Saranchuk, Jeff
Mai, Sabine
author_sort Drachenberg, Darrel
collection PubMed
description The individual risk to progression is unclear for intermediate risk prostate cancer patients. To assess their risk to progression, we examined the level of genomic instability in circulating tumor cells (CTCs) using quantitative three-dimensional (3D) telomere analysis. Data of CTCs from 65 treatment-naïve patients with biopsy-confirmed D’Amico-defined intermediate risk prostate cancer were compared to radical prostatectomy pathology results, which provided a clinical endpoint to the study and confirmed pre-operative pathology or demonstrated upgrading. Hierarchical centroid cluster analysis of 3D pre-operative CTC telomere profiling placed the patients into three subgroups with different potential risk of aggressive disease. Logistic regression modeling of the risk of progression estimated odds ratios with 95% confidence interval (CI) and separated patients into “stable” vs. “risk of aggressive” disease. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.77, while prostate specific antigen (PSA) (AUC of 0.59) and Gleason 3 + 4 = 7 vs. 4 + 3 = 7 (p > 0.6) were unable to predict progressive or stable disease. The data suggest that quantitative 3D telomere profiling of CTCs may be a potential tool for assessing a patient’s prostate cancer pre-treatment risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6627662
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66276622019-07-23 Advancing Risk Assessment of Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer Patients Drachenberg, Darrel Awe, Julius A. Rangel Pozzo, Aline Saranchuk, Jeff Mai, Sabine Cancers (Basel) Article The individual risk to progression is unclear for intermediate risk prostate cancer patients. To assess their risk to progression, we examined the level of genomic instability in circulating tumor cells (CTCs) using quantitative three-dimensional (3D) telomere analysis. Data of CTCs from 65 treatment-naïve patients with biopsy-confirmed D’Amico-defined intermediate risk prostate cancer were compared to radical prostatectomy pathology results, which provided a clinical endpoint to the study and confirmed pre-operative pathology or demonstrated upgrading. Hierarchical centroid cluster analysis of 3D pre-operative CTC telomere profiling placed the patients into three subgroups with different potential risk of aggressive disease. Logistic regression modeling of the risk of progression estimated odds ratios with 95% confidence interval (CI) and separated patients into “stable” vs. “risk of aggressive” disease. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.77, while prostate specific antigen (PSA) (AUC of 0.59) and Gleason 3 + 4 = 7 vs. 4 + 3 = 7 (p > 0.6) were unable to predict progressive or stable disease. The data suggest that quantitative 3D telomere profiling of CTCs may be a potential tool for assessing a patient’s prostate cancer pre-treatment risk. MDPI 2019-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6627662/ /pubmed/31226731 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11060855 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Drachenberg, Darrel
Awe, Julius A.
Rangel Pozzo, Aline
Saranchuk, Jeff
Mai, Sabine
Advancing Risk Assessment of Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer Patients
title Advancing Risk Assessment of Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer Patients
title_full Advancing Risk Assessment of Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer Patients
title_fullStr Advancing Risk Assessment of Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer Patients
title_full_unstemmed Advancing Risk Assessment of Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer Patients
title_short Advancing Risk Assessment of Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer Patients
title_sort advancing risk assessment of intermediate risk prostate cancer patients
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6627662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31226731
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11060855
work_keys_str_mv AT drachenbergdarrel advancingriskassessmentofintermediateriskprostatecancerpatients
AT awejuliusa advancingriskassessmentofintermediateriskprostatecancerpatients
AT rangelpozzoaline advancingriskassessmentofintermediateriskprostatecancerpatients
AT saranchukjeff advancingriskassessmentofintermediateriskprostatecancerpatients
AT maisabine advancingriskassessmentofintermediateriskprostatecancerpatients