Cargando…
A Phase II, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Mipsagargin (G-202) as a Second-Line Therapy Following Sorafenib for Adult Patients with Progressive Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Background: Mipsagargin (G-202) is a thapsigargin-based prodrug with cytotoxic activity masked by a peptide that is cleaved by prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), a protease expressed in prostate cancer cells and the endothelium of tumor vasculature. It was hypothesized that PSMA-mediated act...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6627768/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31212948 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11060833 |
_version_ | 1783434811585593344 |
---|---|
author | Mahalingam, Devalingam Peguero, Julio Cen, Putao Arora, Sukeshi P. Sarantopoulos, John Rowe, Julie Allgood, Victoria Tubb, Benjamin Campos, Luis |
author_facet | Mahalingam, Devalingam Peguero, Julio Cen, Putao Arora, Sukeshi P. Sarantopoulos, John Rowe, Julie Allgood, Victoria Tubb, Benjamin Campos, Luis |
author_sort | Mahalingam, Devalingam |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Mipsagargin (G-202) is a thapsigargin-based prodrug with cytotoxic activity masked by a peptide that is cleaved by prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), a protease expressed in prostate cancer cells and the endothelium of tumor vasculature. It was hypothesized that PSMA-mediated activation of mipsagargin would result in disruption of the tumor vasculature, leading to a decrease in blood flow, and in direct cytotoxic effects on tumor cells, resulting in anti-tumor activity. Method: In this open-label, Phase II study, mipsagargin was administered intravenously on Days 1, 2, and 3 of a 28-day cycle to patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who progressed on or after treatment with sorafenib or intolerant of sorafenib. Assessments included time to disease progression (TTP), response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Blood flow metrics in hepatic lesions were evaluated using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI). Results: Of 25 treated patients, 19 were evaluable for efficacy. None had an objective response, 12 (63.2%) had a best response of stable disease, and 12 (63.2%) showed radiologic progression; seven patients (36.8%) were censored. The median TTP was 134.0 days, median PFS was 129.0 days, and median OS was 205.0 days. Of five patients with DCE-MRI data for 11 HCC lesions, all demonstrated a reduced K(trans) (mean, 52%). The most common treatment-emergent AEs were Grade 1–2 and consisted of increased blood creatinine (68.0%), fatigue (56.0%), and nausea (44.0%). Conclusions: Mipsagargin is relatively well tolerated and promotes prolonged disease stabilization in patients with advanced HCC that had progressed on prior treatment with sorafenib. A significant decrease in K(trans) upon treatment suggests mipsagargin reduces blood flow in hepatic lesions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6627768 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66277682019-07-23 A Phase II, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Mipsagargin (G-202) as a Second-Line Therapy Following Sorafenib for Adult Patients with Progressive Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Mahalingam, Devalingam Peguero, Julio Cen, Putao Arora, Sukeshi P. Sarantopoulos, John Rowe, Julie Allgood, Victoria Tubb, Benjamin Campos, Luis Cancers (Basel) Article Background: Mipsagargin (G-202) is a thapsigargin-based prodrug with cytotoxic activity masked by a peptide that is cleaved by prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), a protease expressed in prostate cancer cells and the endothelium of tumor vasculature. It was hypothesized that PSMA-mediated activation of mipsagargin would result in disruption of the tumor vasculature, leading to a decrease in blood flow, and in direct cytotoxic effects on tumor cells, resulting in anti-tumor activity. Method: In this open-label, Phase II study, mipsagargin was administered intravenously on Days 1, 2, and 3 of a 28-day cycle to patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who progressed on or after treatment with sorafenib or intolerant of sorafenib. Assessments included time to disease progression (TTP), response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Blood flow metrics in hepatic lesions were evaluated using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI). Results: Of 25 treated patients, 19 were evaluable for efficacy. None had an objective response, 12 (63.2%) had a best response of stable disease, and 12 (63.2%) showed radiologic progression; seven patients (36.8%) were censored. The median TTP was 134.0 days, median PFS was 129.0 days, and median OS was 205.0 days. Of five patients with DCE-MRI data for 11 HCC lesions, all demonstrated a reduced K(trans) (mean, 52%). The most common treatment-emergent AEs were Grade 1–2 and consisted of increased blood creatinine (68.0%), fatigue (56.0%), and nausea (44.0%). Conclusions: Mipsagargin is relatively well tolerated and promotes prolonged disease stabilization in patients with advanced HCC that had progressed on prior treatment with sorafenib. A significant decrease in K(trans) upon treatment suggests mipsagargin reduces blood flow in hepatic lesions. MDPI 2019-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6627768/ /pubmed/31212948 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11060833 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Mahalingam, Devalingam Peguero, Julio Cen, Putao Arora, Sukeshi P. Sarantopoulos, John Rowe, Julie Allgood, Victoria Tubb, Benjamin Campos, Luis A Phase II, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Mipsagargin (G-202) as a Second-Line Therapy Following Sorafenib for Adult Patients with Progressive Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma |
title | A Phase II, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Mipsagargin (G-202) as a Second-Line Therapy Following Sorafenib for Adult Patients with Progressive Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma |
title_full | A Phase II, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Mipsagargin (G-202) as a Second-Line Therapy Following Sorafenib for Adult Patients with Progressive Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma |
title_fullStr | A Phase II, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Mipsagargin (G-202) as a Second-Line Therapy Following Sorafenib for Adult Patients with Progressive Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | A Phase II, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Mipsagargin (G-202) as a Second-Line Therapy Following Sorafenib for Adult Patients with Progressive Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma |
title_short | A Phase II, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Mipsagargin (G-202) as a Second-Line Therapy Following Sorafenib for Adult Patients with Progressive Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma |
title_sort | phase ii, multicenter, single-arm study of mipsagargin (g-202) as a second-line therapy following sorafenib for adult patients with progressive advanced hepatocellular carcinoma |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6627768/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31212948 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11060833 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mahalingamdevalingam aphaseiimulticentersinglearmstudyofmipsagarging202asasecondlinetherapyfollowingsorafenibforadultpatientswithprogressiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma AT peguerojulio aphaseiimulticentersinglearmstudyofmipsagarging202asasecondlinetherapyfollowingsorafenibforadultpatientswithprogressiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma AT cenputao aphaseiimulticentersinglearmstudyofmipsagarging202asasecondlinetherapyfollowingsorafenibforadultpatientswithprogressiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma AT arorasukeship aphaseiimulticentersinglearmstudyofmipsagarging202asasecondlinetherapyfollowingsorafenibforadultpatientswithprogressiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma AT sarantopoulosjohn aphaseiimulticentersinglearmstudyofmipsagarging202asasecondlinetherapyfollowingsorafenibforadultpatientswithprogressiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma AT rowejulie aphaseiimulticentersinglearmstudyofmipsagarging202asasecondlinetherapyfollowingsorafenibforadultpatientswithprogressiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma AT allgoodvictoria aphaseiimulticentersinglearmstudyofmipsagarging202asasecondlinetherapyfollowingsorafenibforadultpatientswithprogressiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma AT tubbbenjamin aphaseiimulticentersinglearmstudyofmipsagarging202asasecondlinetherapyfollowingsorafenibforadultpatientswithprogressiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma AT camposluis aphaseiimulticentersinglearmstudyofmipsagarging202asasecondlinetherapyfollowingsorafenibforadultpatientswithprogressiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma AT mahalingamdevalingam phaseiimulticentersinglearmstudyofmipsagarging202asasecondlinetherapyfollowingsorafenibforadultpatientswithprogressiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma AT peguerojulio phaseiimulticentersinglearmstudyofmipsagarging202asasecondlinetherapyfollowingsorafenibforadultpatientswithprogressiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma AT cenputao phaseiimulticentersinglearmstudyofmipsagarging202asasecondlinetherapyfollowingsorafenibforadultpatientswithprogressiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma AT arorasukeship phaseiimulticentersinglearmstudyofmipsagarging202asasecondlinetherapyfollowingsorafenibforadultpatientswithprogressiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma AT sarantopoulosjohn phaseiimulticentersinglearmstudyofmipsagarging202asasecondlinetherapyfollowingsorafenibforadultpatientswithprogressiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma AT rowejulie phaseiimulticentersinglearmstudyofmipsagarging202asasecondlinetherapyfollowingsorafenibforadultpatientswithprogressiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma AT allgoodvictoria phaseiimulticentersinglearmstudyofmipsagarging202asasecondlinetherapyfollowingsorafenibforadultpatientswithprogressiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma AT tubbbenjamin phaseiimulticentersinglearmstudyofmipsagarging202asasecondlinetherapyfollowingsorafenibforadultpatientswithprogressiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma AT camposluis phaseiimulticentersinglearmstudyofmipsagarging202asasecondlinetherapyfollowingsorafenibforadultpatientswithprogressiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma |