Cargando…

A Phase II, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Mipsagargin (G-202) as a Second-Line Therapy Following Sorafenib for Adult Patients with Progressive Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background: Mipsagargin (G-202) is a thapsigargin-based prodrug with cytotoxic activity masked by a peptide that is cleaved by prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), a protease expressed in prostate cancer cells and the endothelium of tumor vasculature. It was hypothesized that PSMA-mediated act...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mahalingam, Devalingam, Peguero, Julio, Cen, Putao, Arora, Sukeshi P., Sarantopoulos, John, Rowe, Julie, Allgood, Victoria, Tubb, Benjamin, Campos, Luis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6627768/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31212948
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11060833
_version_ 1783434811585593344
author Mahalingam, Devalingam
Peguero, Julio
Cen, Putao
Arora, Sukeshi P.
Sarantopoulos, John
Rowe, Julie
Allgood, Victoria
Tubb, Benjamin
Campos, Luis
author_facet Mahalingam, Devalingam
Peguero, Julio
Cen, Putao
Arora, Sukeshi P.
Sarantopoulos, John
Rowe, Julie
Allgood, Victoria
Tubb, Benjamin
Campos, Luis
author_sort Mahalingam, Devalingam
collection PubMed
description Background: Mipsagargin (G-202) is a thapsigargin-based prodrug with cytotoxic activity masked by a peptide that is cleaved by prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), a protease expressed in prostate cancer cells and the endothelium of tumor vasculature. It was hypothesized that PSMA-mediated activation of mipsagargin would result in disruption of the tumor vasculature, leading to a decrease in blood flow, and in direct cytotoxic effects on tumor cells, resulting in anti-tumor activity. Method: In this open-label, Phase II study, mipsagargin was administered intravenously on Days 1, 2, and 3 of a 28-day cycle to patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who progressed on or after treatment with sorafenib or intolerant of sorafenib. Assessments included time to disease progression (TTP), response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Blood flow metrics in hepatic lesions were evaluated using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI). Results: Of 25 treated patients, 19 were evaluable for efficacy. None had an objective response, 12 (63.2%) had a best response of stable disease, and 12 (63.2%) showed radiologic progression; seven patients (36.8%) were censored. The median TTP was 134.0 days, median PFS was 129.0 days, and median OS was 205.0 days. Of five patients with DCE-MRI data for 11 HCC lesions, all demonstrated a reduced K(trans) (mean, 52%). The most common treatment-emergent AEs were Grade 1–2 and consisted of increased blood creatinine (68.0%), fatigue (56.0%), and nausea (44.0%). Conclusions: Mipsagargin is relatively well tolerated and promotes prolonged disease stabilization in patients with advanced HCC that had progressed on prior treatment with sorafenib. A significant decrease in K(trans) upon treatment suggests mipsagargin reduces blood flow in hepatic lesions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6627768
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66277682019-07-23 A Phase II, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Mipsagargin (G-202) as a Second-Line Therapy Following Sorafenib for Adult Patients with Progressive Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Mahalingam, Devalingam Peguero, Julio Cen, Putao Arora, Sukeshi P. Sarantopoulos, John Rowe, Julie Allgood, Victoria Tubb, Benjamin Campos, Luis Cancers (Basel) Article Background: Mipsagargin (G-202) is a thapsigargin-based prodrug with cytotoxic activity masked by a peptide that is cleaved by prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), a protease expressed in prostate cancer cells and the endothelium of tumor vasculature. It was hypothesized that PSMA-mediated activation of mipsagargin would result in disruption of the tumor vasculature, leading to a decrease in blood flow, and in direct cytotoxic effects on tumor cells, resulting in anti-tumor activity. Method: In this open-label, Phase II study, mipsagargin was administered intravenously on Days 1, 2, and 3 of a 28-day cycle to patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who progressed on or after treatment with sorafenib or intolerant of sorafenib. Assessments included time to disease progression (TTP), response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Blood flow metrics in hepatic lesions were evaluated using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI). Results: Of 25 treated patients, 19 were evaluable for efficacy. None had an objective response, 12 (63.2%) had a best response of stable disease, and 12 (63.2%) showed radiologic progression; seven patients (36.8%) were censored. The median TTP was 134.0 days, median PFS was 129.0 days, and median OS was 205.0 days. Of five patients with DCE-MRI data for 11 HCC lesions, all demonstrated a reduced K(trans) (mean, 52%). The most common treatment-emergent AEs were Grade 1–2 and consisted of increased blood creatinine (68.0%), fatigue (56.0%), and nausea (44.0%). Conclusions: Mipsagargin is relatively well tolerated and promotes prolonged disease stabilization in patients with advanced HCC that had progressed on prior treatment with sorafenib. A significant decrease in K(trans) upon treatment suggests mipsagargin reduces blood flow in hepatic lesions. MDPI 2019-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6627768/ /pubmed/31212948 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11060833 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Mahalingam, Devalingam
Peguero, Julio
Cen, Putao
Arora, Sukeshi P.
Sarantopoulos, John
Rowe, Julie
Allgood, Victoria
Tubb, Benjamin
Campos, Luis
A Phase II, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Mipsagargin (G-202) as a Second-Line Therapy Following Sorafenib for Adult Patients with Progressive Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title A Phase II, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Mipsagargin (G-202) as a Second-Line Therapy Following Sorafenib for Adult Patients with Progressive Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title_full A Phase II, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Mipsagargin (G-202) as a Second-Line Therapy Following Sorafenib for Adult Patients with Progressive Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title_fullStr A Phase II, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Mipsagargin (G-202) as a Second-Line Therapy Following Sorafenib for Adult Patients with Progressive Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed A Phase II, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Mipsagargin (G-202) as a Second-Line Therapy Following Sorafenib for Adult Patients with Progressive Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title_short A Phase II, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Mipsagargin (G-202) as a Second-Line Therapy Following Sorafenib for Adult Patients with Progressive Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title_sort phase ii, multicenter, single-arm study of mipsagargin (g-202) as a second-line therapy following sorafenib for adult patients with progressive advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6627768/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31212948
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11060833
work_keys_str_mv AT mahalingamdevalingam aphaseiimulticentersinglearmstudyofmipsagarging202asasecondlinetherapyfollowingsorafenibforadultpatientswithprogressiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT peguerojulio aphaseiimulticentersinglearmstudyofmipsagarging202asasecondlinetherapyfollowingsorafenibforadultpatientswithprogressiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT cenputao aphaseiimulticentersinglearmstudyofmipsagarging202asasecondlinetherapyfollowingsorafenibforadultpatientswithprogressiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT arorasukeship aphaseiimulticentersinglearmstudyofmipsagarging202asasecondlinetherapyfollowingsorafenibforadultpatientswithprogressiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT sarantopoulosjohn aphaseiimulticentersinglearmstudyofmipsagarging202asasecondlinetherapyfollowingsorafenibforadultpatientswithprogressiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT rowejulie aphaseiimulticentersinglearmstudyofmipsagarging202asasecondlinetherapyfollowingsorafenibforadultpatientswithprogressiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT allgoodvictoria aphaseiimulticentersinglearmstudyofmipsagarging202asasecondlinetherapyfollowingsorafenibforadultpatientswithprogressiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT tubbbenjamin aphaseiimulticentersinglearmstudyofmipsagarging202asasecondlinetherapyfollowingsorafenibforadultpatientswithprogressiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT camposluis aphaseiimulticentersinglearmstudyofmipsagarging202asasecondlinetherapyfollowingsorafenibforadultpatientswithprogressiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT mahalingamdevalingam phaseiimulticentersinglearmstudyofmipsagarging202asasecondlinetherapyfollowingsorafenibforadultpatientswithprogressiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT peguerojulio phaseiimulticentersinglearmstudyofmipsagarging202asasecondlinetherapyfollowingsorafenibforadultpatientswithprogressiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT cenputao phaseiimulticentersinglearmstudyofmipsagarging202asasecondlinetherapyfollowingsorafenibforadultpatientswithprogressiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT arorasukeship phaseiimulticentersinglearmstudyofmipsagarging202asasecondlinetherapyfollowingsorafenibforadultpatientswithprogressiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT sarantopoulosjohn phaseiimulticentersinglearmstudyofmipsagarging202asasecondlinetherapyfollowingsorafenibforadultpatientswithprogressiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT rowejulie phaseiimulticentersinglearmstudyofmipsagarging202asasecondlinetherapyfollowingsorafenibforadultpatientswithprogressiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT allgoodvictoria phaseiimulticentersinglearmstudyofmipsagarging202asasecondlinetherapyfollowingsorafenibforadultpatientswithprogressiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT tubbbenjamin phaseiimulticentersinglearmstudyofmipsagarging202asasecondlinetherapyfollowingsorafenibforadultpatientswithprogressiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT camposluis phaseiimulticentersinglearmstudyofmipsagarging202asasecondlinetherapyfollowingsorafenibforadultpatientswithprogressiveadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma