Cargando…
Technology to Support Aging in Place: Older Adults’ Perspectives
The U.S. population over 65 years of age is increasing. Most older adults prefer to age in place, and technologies, including Internet of things (IoT), Ambient/Active Assisted Living (AAL) robots and other artificial intelligence (AI), can support independent living. However, a top-down design proce...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6627975/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30974780 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare7020060 |
_version_ | 1783434858915168256 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Shengzhi Bolling, Khalisa Mao, Wenlin Reichstadt, Jennifer Jeste, Dilip Kim, Ho-Cheol Nebeker, Camille |
author_facet | Wang, Shengzhi Bolling, Khalisa Mao, Wenlin Reichstadt, Jennifer Jeste, Dilip Kim, Ho-Cheol Nebeker, Camille |
author_sort | Wang, Shengzhi |
collection | PubMed |
description | The U.S. population over 65 years of age is increasing. Most older adults prefer to age in place, and technologies, including Internet of things (IoT), Ambient/Active Assisted Living (AAL) robots and other artificial intelligence (AI), can support independent living. However, a top-down design process creates mismatches between technologies and older adults’ needs. A user-centered design approach was used to identify older adults’ perspectives regarding AAL and AI technologies and gauge interest in participating in a co-design process. A survey was used to obtain demographic characteristics and assess privacy perspectives. A convenience sample of 31 retirement community residents participated in one of two 90-min focus group sessions. The semi-structured group interview solicited barriers and facilitators to technology adoption, privacy attitudes, and interest in project co-design participation to inform technology development. Focus group sessions were audiotaped and professionally transcribed. Transcripts were reviewed and coded to identify themes and patterns. Descriptive statistics were applied to the quantitative data. Identified barriers to technology use included low technology literacy, including lack of familiarity with terminology, and physical challenges, which can make adoption difficult. Facilitators included an eagerness to learn, interest in co-design, and a desire to understand and control their data. Most participants identified as privacy pragmatics and fundamentalists, indicating that privacy is important to older adults. At the same time, they also reported a willingness to contribute to the design of technologies that would facilitate aging independently. There is a need to increase technology literacy of older adults along with aging literacy of technologists. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6627975 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66279752019-07-23 Technology to Support Aging in Place: Older Adults’ Perspectives Wang, Shengzhi Bolling, Khalisa Mao, Wenlin Reichstadt, Jennifer Jeste, Dilip Kim, Ho-Cheol Nebeker, Camille Healthcare (Basel) Article The U.S. population over 65 years of age is increasing. Most older adults prefer to age in place, and technologies, including Internet of things (IoT), Ambient/Active Assisted Living (AAL) robots and other artificial intelligence (AI), can support independent living. However, a top-down design process creates mismatches between technologies and older adults’ needs. A user-centered design approach was used to identify older adults’ perspectives regarding AAL and AI technologies and gauge interest in participating in a co-design process. A survey was used to obtain demographic characteristics and assess privacy perspectives. A convenience sample of 31 retirement community residents participated in one of two 90-min focus group sessions. The semi-structured group interview solicited barriers and facilitators to technology adoption, privacy attitudes, and interest in project co-design participation to inform technology development. Focus group sessions were audiotaped and professionally transcribed. Transcripts were reviewed and coded to identify themes and patterns. Descriptive statistics were applied to the quantitative data. Identified barriers to technology use included low technology literacy, including lack of familiarity with terminology, and physical challenges, which can make adoption difficult. Facilitators included an eagerness to learn, interest in co-design, and a desire to understand and control their data. Most participants identified as privacy pragmatics and fundamentalists, indicating that privacy is important to older adults. At the same time, they also reported a willingness to contribute to the design of technologies that would facilitate aging independently. There is a need to increase technology literacy of older adults along with aging literacy of technologists. MDPI 2019-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6627975/ /pubmed/30974780 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare7020060 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Wang, Shengzhi Bolling, Khalisa Mao, Wenlin Reichstadt, Jennifer Jeste, Dilip Kim, Ho-Cheol Nebeker, Camille Technology to Support Aging in Place: Older Adults’ Perspectives |
title | Technology to Support Aging in Place: Older Adults’ Perspectives |
title_full | Technology to Support Aging in Place: Older Adults’ Perspectives |
title_fullStr | Technology to Support Aging in Place: Older Adults’ Perspectives |
title_full_unstemmed | Technology to Support Aging in Place: Older Adults’ Perspectives |
title_short | Technology to Support Aging in Place: Older Adults’ Perspectives |
title_sort | technology to support aging in place: older adults’ perspectives |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6627975/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30974780 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare7020060 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangshengzhi technologytosupportaginginplaceolderadultsperspectives AT bollingkhalisa technologytosupportaginginplaceolderadultsperspectives AT maowenlin technologytosupportaginginplaceolderadultsperspectives AT reichstadtjennifer technologytosupportaginginplaceolderadultsperspectives AT jestedilip technologytosupportaginginplaceolderadultsperspectives AT kimhocheol technologytosupportaginginplaceolderadultsperspectives AT nebekercamille technologytosupportaginginplaceolderadultsperspectives |