Cargando…

Technology to Support Aging in Place: Older Adults’ Perspectives

The U.S. population over 65 years of age is increasing. Most older adults prefer to age in place, and technologies, including Internet of things (IoT), Ambient/Active Assisted Living (AAL) robots and other artificial intelligence (AI), can support independent living. However, a top-down design proce...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Shengzhi, Bolling, Khalisa, Mao, Wenlin, Reichstadt, Jennifer, Jeste, Dilip, Kim, Ho-Cheol, Nebeker, Camille
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6627975/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30974780
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare7020060
_version_ 1783434858915168256
author Wang, Shengzhi
Bolling, Khalisa
Mao, Wenlin
Reichstadt, Jennifer
Jeste, Dilip
Kim, Ho-Cheol
Nebeker, Camille
author_facet Wang, Shengzhi
Bolling, Khalisa
Mao, Wenlin
Reichstadt, Jennifer
Jeste, Dilip
Kim, Ho-Cheol
Nebeker, Camille
author_sort Wang, Shengzhi
collection PubMed
description The U.S. population over 65 years of age is increasing. Most older adults prefer to age in place, and technologies, including Internet of things (IoT), Ambient/Active Assisted Living (AAL) robots and other artificial intelligence (AI), can support independent living. However, a top-down design process creates mismatches between technologies and older adults’ needs. A user-centered design approach was used to identify older adults’ perspectives regarding AAL and AI technologies and gauge interest in participating in a co-design process. A survey was used to obtain demographic characteristics and assess privacy perspectives. A convenience sample of 31 retirement community residents participated in one of two 90-min focus group sessions. The semi-structured group interview solicited barriers and facilitators to technology adoption, privacy attitudes, and interest in project co-design participation to inform technology development. Focus group sessions were audiotaped and professionally transcribed. Transcripts were reviewed and coded to identify themes and patterns. Descriptive statistics were applied to the quantitative data. Identified barriers to technology use included low technology literacy, including lack of familiarity with terminology, and physical challenges, which can make adoption difficult. Facilitators included an eagerness to learn, interest in co-design, and a desire to understand and control their data. Most participants identified as privacy pragmatics and fundamentalists, indicating that privacy is important to older adults. At the same time, they also reported a willingness to contribute to the design of technologies that would facilitate aging independently. There is a need to increase technology literacy of older adults along with aging literacy of technologists.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6627975
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66279752019-07-23 Technology to Support Aging in Place: Older Adults’ Perspectives Wang, Shengzhi Bolling, Khalisa Mao, Wenlin Reichstadt, Jennifer Jeste, Dilip Kim, Ho-Cheol Nebeker, Camille Healthcare (Basel) Article The U.S. population over 65 years of age is increasing. Most older adults prefer to age in place, and technologies, including Internet of things (IoT), Ambient/Active Assisted Living (AAL) robots and other artificial intelligence (AI), can support independent living. However, a top-down design process creates mismatches between technologies and older adults’ needs. A user-centered design approach was used to identify older adults’ perspectives regarding AAL and AI technologies and gauge interest in participating in a co-design process. A survey was used to obtain demographic characteristics and assess privacy perspectives. A convenience sample of 31 retirement community residents participated in one of two 90-min focus group sessions. The semi-structured group interview solicited barriers and facilitators to technology adoption, privacy attitudes, and interest in project co-design participation to inform technology development. Focus group sessions were audiotaped and professionally transcribed. Transcripts were reviewed and coded to identify themes and patterns. Descriptive statistics were applied to the quantitative data. Identified barriers to technology use included low technology literacy, including lack of familiarity with terminology, and physical challenges, which can make adoption difficult. Facilitators included an eagerness to learn, interest in co-design, and a desire to understand and control their data. Most participants identified as privacy pragmatics and fundamentalists, indicating that privacy is important to older adults. At the same time, they also reported a willingness to contribute to the design of technologies that would facilitate aging independently. There is a need to increase technology literacy of older adults along with aging literacy of technologists. MDPI 2019-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6627975/ /pubmed/30974780 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare7020060 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wang, Shengzhi
Bolling, Khalisa
Mao, Wenlin
Reichstadt, Jennifer
Jeste, Dilip
Kim, Ho-Cheol
Nebeker, Camille
Technology to Support Aging in Place: Older Adults’ Perspectives
title Technology to Support Aging in Place: Older Adults’ Perspectives
title_full Technology to Support Aging in Place: Older Adults’ Perspectives
title_fullStr Technology to Support Aging in Place: Older Adults’ Perspectives
title_full_unstemmed Technology to Support Aging in Place: Older Adults’ Perspectives
title_short Technology to Support Aging in Place: Older Adults’ Perspectives
title_sort technology to support aging in place: older adults’ perspectives
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6627975/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30974780
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare7020060
work_keys_str_mv AT wangshengzhi technologytosupportaginginplaceolderadultsperspectives
AT bollingkhalisa technologytosupportaginginplaceolderadultsperspectives
AT maowenlin technologytosupportaginginplaceolderadultsperspectives
AT reichstadtjennifer technologytosupportaginginplaceolderadultsperspectives
AT jestedilip technologytosupportaginginplaceolderadultsperspectives
AT kimhocheol technologytosupportaginginplaceolderadultsperspectives
AT nebekercamille technologytosupportaginginplaceolderadultsperspectives