Cargando…

A Biomechanical Comparison of Successful and Unsuccessful Snatch Attempts among Elite Male Weightlifters

The success factor of the snatch has not been identified. Determining the success factors of the snatch among elite weightlifters might help to attain a successful snatch. This study aimed at clarifying the factors that lead to a successful snatch based on barbell trajectory among elite male weightl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nagao, Hideyuki, Kubo, Yasuyuki, Tsuno, Tempei, Kurosaka, Sho, Muto, Masato
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6628121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31234453
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports7060151
_version_ 1783434892323848192
author Nagao, Hideyuki
Kubo, Yasuyuki
Tsuno, Tempei
Kurosaka, Sho
Muto, Masato
author_facet Nagao, Hideyuki
Kubo, Yasuyuki
Tsuno, Tempei
Kurosaka, Sho
Muto, Masato
author_sort Nagao, Hideyuki
collection PubMed
description The success factor of the snatch has not been identified. Determining the success factors of the snatch among elite weightlifters might help to attain a successful snatch. This study aimed at clarifying the factors that lead to a successful snatch based on barbell trajectory among elite male weightlifters. Data were collected at the 2017 World and Junior World Weightlifting Championships. We digitized the barbell trajectory of the successful and unsuccessful snatch attempts of 61 lifters—an unsuccessful lift would be as a result of a frontward barbell drop—and calculated the kinematic and kinetic parameters of the barbell. No significant difference was found in the barbell maximum height (Dy1) between the successful and unsuccessful lifts. The amount of backward displacement of the barbell in the second pull phase to the catch position (DxL) of the successful lift was significantly larger than that of the unsuccessful lift (successful: 0.11 ± 0.05 m; unsuccessful: 0.10 ± 0.06 m; p < 0.01; d = 0.278). The barbell drop distance in the catch phase (Dy3) of the successful lift was significantly smaller than that in the unsuccessful lift (successful: 0.17 ± 0.04 m; unsuccessful: 0.18 ± 0.04 m; p < 0.001, d = 0.361). These results suggest that DxL and Dy3 are factors leading to a successful snatch lift, but not Dy1. The relative position in the sagittal axis of the barbell and the lifter in the catch position, and catching the barbell when its momentum was low, are important in order to achieve a successful snatch.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6628121
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66281212019-07-23 A Biomechanical Comparison of Successful and Unsuccessful Snatch Attempts among Elite Male Weightlifters Nagao, Hideyuki Kubo, Yasuyuki Tsuno, Tempei Kurosaka, Sho Muto, Masato Sports (Basel) Article The success factor of the snatch has not been identified. Determining the success factors of the snatch among elite weightlifters might help to attain a successful snatch. This study aimed at clarifying the factors that lead to a successful snatch based on barbell trajectory among elite male weightlifters. Data were collected at the 2017 World and Junior World Weightlifting Championships. We digitized the barbell trajectory of the successful and unsuccessful snatch attempts of 61 lifters—an unsuccessful lift would be as a result of a frontward barbell drop—and calculated the kinematic and kinetic parameters of the barbell. No significant difference was found in the barbell maximum height (Dy1) between the successful and unsuccessful lifts. The amount of backward displacement of the barbell in the second pull phase to the catch position (DxL) of the successful lift was significantly larger than that of the unsuccessful lift (successful: 0.11 ± 0.05 m; unsuccessful: 0.10 ± 0.06 m; p < 0.01; d = 0.278). The barbell drop distance in the catch phase (Dy3) of the successful lift was significantly smaller than that in the unsuccessful lift (successful: 0.17 ± 0.04 m; unsuccessful: 0.18 ± 0.04 m; p < 0.001, d = 0.361). These results suggest that DxL and Dy3 are factors leading to a successful snatch lift, but not Dy1. The relative position in the sagittal axis of the barbell and the lifter in the catch position, and catching the barbell when its momentum was low, are important in order to achieve a successful snatch. MDPI 2019-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6628121/ /pubmed/31234453 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports7060151 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Nagao, Hideyuki
Kubo, Yasuyuki
Tsuno, Tempei
Kurosaka, Sho
Muto, Masato
A Biomechanical Comparison of Successful and Unsuccessful Snatch Attempts among Elite Male Weightlifters
title A Biomechanical Comparison of Successful and Unsuccessful Snatch Attempts among Elite Male Weightlifters
title_full A Biomechanical Comparison of Successful and Unsuccessful Snatch Attempts among Elite Male Weightlifters
title_fullStr A Biomechanical Comparison of Successful and Unsuccessful Snatch Attempts among Elite Male Weightlifters
title_full_unstemmed A Biomechanical Comparison of Successful and Unsuccessful Snatch Attempts among Elite Male Weightlifters
title_short A Biomechanical Comparison of Successful and Unsuccessful Snatch Attempts among Elite Male Weightlifters
title_sort biomechanical comparison of successful and unsuccessful snatch attempts among elite male weightlifters
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6628121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31234453
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports7060151
work_keys_str_mv AT nagaohideyuki abiomechanicalcomparisonofsuccessfulandunsuccessfulsnatchattemptsamongelitemaleweightlifters
AT kuboyasuyuki abiomechanicalcomparisonofsuccessfulandunsuccessfulsnatchattemptsamongelitemaleweightlifters
AT tsunotempei abiomechanicalcomparisonofsuccessfulandunsuccessfulsnatchattemptsamongelitemaleweightlifters
AT kurosakasho abiomechanicalcomparisonofsuccessfulandunsuccessfulsnatchattemptsamongelitemaleweightlifters
AT mutomasato abiomechanicalcomparisonofsuccessfulandunsuccessfulsnatchattemptsamongelitemaleweightlifters
AT nagaohideyuki biomechanicalcomparisonofsuccessfulandunsuccessfulsnatchattemptsamongelitemaleweightlifters
AT kuboyasuyuki biomechanicalcomparisonofsuccessfulandunsuccessfulsnatchattemptsamongelitemaleweightlifters
AT tsunotempei biomechanicalcomparisonofsuccessfulandunsuccessfulsnatchattemptsamongelitemaleweightlifters
AT kurosakasho biomechanicalcomparisonofsuccessfulandunsuccessfulsnatchattemptsamongelitemaleweightlifters
AT mutomasato biomechanicalcomparisonofsuccessfulandunsuccessfulsnatchattemptsamongelitemaleweightlifters