Cargando…

School health for migrant children: a myth or a must?

BACKGROUND: School health plays a vital role in lifelong health outcomes. Migrant children are a vulnerable population that seem to have inadequate health promotion interventions, and limited studies have assessed their health status and personal hygiene at schools. This study aimed to evaluate scho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tuangratananon, Titiporn, Julchoo, Sataporn, Wanwong, Yaowaluk, Sinam, Pigunkaew, Suphanchaimat, Rapeepong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6628157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31372074
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S189081
_version_ 1783434900057096192
author Tuangratananon, Titiporn
Julchoo, Sataporn
Wanwong, Yaowaluk
Sinam, Pigunkaew
Suphanchaimat, Rapeepong
author_facet Tuangratananon, Titiporn
Julchoo, Sataporn
Wanwong, Yaowaluk
Sinam, Pigunkaew
Suphanchaimat, Rapeepong
author_sort Tuangratananon, Titiporn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: School health plays a vital role in lifelong health outcomes. Migrant children are a vulnerable population that seem to have inadequate health promotion interventions, and limited studies have assessed their health status and personal hygiene at schools. This study aimed to evaluate school health promotion and health outcomes of migrant children in Thai public schools (TPSs) and migrant learning centers (MLCs). METHODS: A cross-sectional study was applied. Data were collected from questionnaires focusing on health care access, nutritional status, and personal hygiene of migrant children in two MLCs and four TPSs, along with Thai children in the same TPSs. Descriptive analysis and logistic regression model were used to compare access to health promotion and the health status of migrant children with the Thai counterparts. RESULTS: Blended school health services were generally found in TPSs, which led to indifferent vaccination rates between Thai and migrant children in TPSs (odds ratio [OR] 0.457 (0.186–1.120)). However, vaccination rates of migrant children in MLCs are noticeably around fourfold lower. Overall, migrant children received fewer dental health services than Thai children, both in TPSs (OR 0.198 (0.076,0.517)) and MLCs (OR 0.156 (0.004,0.055)). Other personal hygiene behaviors and nutritional statuses saw no significant difference between Thai children and migrant children in either TPSs or MLCs. The uninsured status among migrant children posed another challenge to health care access, as 81.7% of the migrant children in MLCs and 56.6% in TPSs were uninsured. CONCLUSION: Migrant children in MLCs received a lower rate of essential vaccinations compared to those in TPSs. Dental services appeared to be the most neglected area of care in migrant children. The findings indicate the necessity of supportive policy for MLCs, while regulating quality and standards concurrently. Multisectoral collaboration is critically needed for sustainably improving the quality of life of migrant children.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6628157
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66281572019-08-01 School health for migrant children: a myth or a must? Tuangratananon, Titiporn Julchoo, Sataporn Wanwong, Yaowaluk Sinam, Pigunkaew Suphanchaimat, Rapeepong Risk Manag Healthc Policy Original Research BACKGROUND: School health plays a vital role in lifelong health outcomes. Migrant children are a vulnerable population that seem to have inadequate health promotion interventions, and limited studies have assessed their health status and personal hygiene at schools. This study aimed to evaluate school health promotion and health outcomes of migrant children in Thai public schools (TPSs) and migrant learning centers (MLCs). METHODS: A cross-sectional study was applied. Data were collected from questionnaires focusing on health care access, nutritional status, and personal hygiene of migrant children in two MLCs and four TPSs, along with Thai children in the same TPSs. Descriptive analysis and logistic regression model were used to compare access to health promotion and the health status of migrant children with the Thai counterparts. RESULTS: Blended school health services were generally found in TPSs, which led to indifferent vaccination rates between Thai and migrant children in TPSs (odds ratio [OR] 0.457 (0.186–1.120)). However, vaccination rates of migrant children in MLCs are noticeably around fourfold lower. Overall, migrant children received fewer dental health services than Thai children, both in TPSs (OR 0.198 (0.076,0.517)) and MLCs (OR 0.156 (0.004,0.055)). Other personal hygiene behaviors and nutritional statuses saw no significant difference between Thai children and migrant children in either TPSs or MLCs. The uninsured status among migrant children posed another challenge to health care access, as 81.7% of the migrant children in MLCs and 56.6% in TPSs were uninsured. CONCLUSION: Migrant children in MLCs received a lower rate of essential vaccinations compared to those in TPSs. Dental services appeared to be the most neglected area of care in migrant children. The findings indicate the necessity of supportive policy for MLCs, while regulating quality and standards concurrently. Multisectoral collaboration is critically needed for sustainably improving the quality of life of migrant children. Dove 2019-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6628157/ /pubmed/31372074 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S189081 Text en © 2019 Tuangratananon et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Tuangratananon, Titiporn
Julchoo, Sataporn
Wanwong, Yaowaluk
Sinam, Pigunkaew
Suphanchaimat, Rapeepong
School health for migrant children: a myth or a must?
title School health for migrant children: a myth or a must?
title_full School health for migrant children: a myth or a must?
title_fullStr School health for migrant children: a myth or a must?
title_full_unstemmed School health for migrant children: a myth or a must?
title_short School health for migrant children: a myth or a must?
title_sort school health for migrant children: a myth or a must?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6628157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31372074
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S189081
work_keys_str_mv AT tuangratananontitiporn schoolhealthformigrantchildrenamythoramust
AT julchoosataporn schoolhealthformigrantchildrenamythoramust
AT wanwongyaowaluk schoolhealthformigrantchildrenamythoramust
AT sinampigunkaew schoolhealthformigrantchildrenamythoramust
AT suphanchaimatrapeepong schoolhealthformigrantchildrenamythoramust