Cargando…

Step-by-step loupes-mTESE in non-obstructive azoospermic men, a retrospective study

BACKGROUND: Men with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) may have sperm in their testes and a procedure of sperm retrieval and assisted reproduction is required in them to allow fertility. Standard procedures such as fine needle aspiration (FNA) and conventional testicular sperm extraction (cTESE) har...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bouker, Amin, Halouani, Lazhar, Kharouf, Mahmoud, Latrous, Habib, Makni, Mounir, Marrakchi, Ouafi, Zouari, Raoudha, Fourati, Salima
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6628476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31338196
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12610-019-0091-9
_version_ 1783434968932810752
author Bouker, Amin
Halouani, Lazhar
Kharouf, Mahmoud
Latrous, Habib
Makni, Mounir
Marrakchi, Ouafi
Zouari, Raoudha
Fourati, Salima
author_facet Bouker, Amin
Halouani, Lazhar
Kharouf, Mahmoud
Latrous, Habib
Makni, Mounir
Marrakchi, Ouafi
Zouari, Raoudha
Fourati, Salima
author_sort Bouker, Amin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Men with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) may have sperm in their testes and a procedure of sperm retrieval and assisted reproduction is required in them to allow fertility. Standard procedures such as fine needle aspiration (FNA) and conventional testicular sperm extraction (cTESE) harvest random samples with a sperm retrieval rate (SRR) of 45%. Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) is nowadays considered to be the most accurate technique to retrieve sperm in men with NOA. This procedure can identify dilated tubules that are more likely to contain viable sperm with a SRR of 60%. RESULTS: In our center, testicular biopsy was conducted in a standard fashion in 321 patients with NOA until March 2003. From then to December 2017, due to the lack of an operating microscope, we used 6 fold magnifying loupes to perform a step-by-step macro- mTESE in 1050 patients. Sperm was found in the first testis in 61% of the cases, leading to stop the procedure with less testicular damage. We increased our SRR from 43 to 51.8% in an acceptable operating time of 75mn for both sides. CONCLUSIONS: In institutions where surgeons cannot afford an operating microscope, this modified mTESE technique using × 6 magnifying loupes is reliable, especially in patients with low testicular volumes and high FSH, in whom dilated tubules can be easily identified from the surrounding tissue.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6628476
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66284762019-07-23 Step-by-step loupes-mTESE in non-obstructive azoospermic men, a retrospective study Bouker, Amin Halouani, Lazhar Kharouf, Mahmoud Latrous, Habib Makni, Mounir Marrakchi, Ouafi Zouari, Raoudha Fourati, Salima Basic Clin Androl Research Article BACKGROUND: Men with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) may have sperm in their testes and a procedure of sperm retrieval and assisted reproduction is required in them to allow fertility. Standard procedures such as fine needle aspiration (FNA) and conventional testicular sperm extraction (cTESE) harvest random samples with a sperm retrieval rate (SRR) of 45%. Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) is nowadays considered to be the most accurate technique to retrieve sperm in men with NOA. This procedure can identify dilated tubules that are more likely to contain viable sperm with a SRR of 60%. RESULTS: In our center, testicular biopsy was conducted in a standard fashion in 321 patients with NOA until March 2003. From then to December 2017, due to the lack of an operating microscope, we used 6 fold magnifying loupes to perform a step-by-step macro- mTESE in 1050 patients. Sperm was found in the first testis in 61% of the cases, leading to stop the procedure with less testicular damage. We increased our SRR from 43 to 51.8% in an acceptable operating time of 75mn for both sides. CONCLUSIONS: In institutions where surgeons cannot afford an operating microscope, this modified mTESE technique using × 6 magnifying loupes is reliable, especially in patients with low testicular volumes and high FSH, in whom dilated tubules can be easily identified from the surrounding tissue. BioMed Central 2019-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6628476/ /pubmed/31338196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12610-019-0091-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bouker, Amin
Halouani, Lazhar
Kharouf, Mahmoud
Latrous, Habib
Makni, Mounir
Marrakchi, Ouafi
Zouari, Raoudha
Fourati, Salima
Step-by-step loupes-mTESE in non-obstructive azoospermic men, a retrospective study
title Step-by-step loupes-mTESE in non-obstructive azoospermic men, a retrospective study
title_full Step-by-step loupes-mTESE in non-obstructive azoospermic men, a retrospective study
title_fullStr Step-by-step loupes-mTESE in non-obstructive azoospermic men, a retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Step-by-step loupes-mTESE in non-obstructive azoospermic men, a retrospective study
title_short Step-by-step loupes-mTESE in non-obstructive azoospermic men, a retrospective study
title_sort step-by-step loupes-mtese in non-obstructive azoospermic men, a retrospective study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6628476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31338196
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12610-019-0091-9
work_keys_str_mv AT boukeramin stepbysteploupesmteseinnonobstructiveazoospermicmenaretrospectivestudy
AT halouanilazhar stepbysteploupesmteseinnonobstructiveazoospermicmenaretrospectivestudy
AT kharoufmahmoud stepbysteploupesmteseinnonobstructiveazoospermicmenaretrospectivestudy
AT latroushabib stepbysteploupesmteseinnonobstructiveazoospermicmenaretrospectivestudy
AT maknimounir stepbysteploupesmteseinnonobstructiveazoospermicmenaretrospectivestudy
AT marrakchiouafi stepbysteploupesmteseinnonobstructiveazoospermicmenaretrospectivestudy
AT zouariraoudha stepbysteploupesmteseinnonobstructiveazoospermicmenaretrospectivestudy
AT fouratisalima stepbysteploupesmteseinnonobstructiveazoospermicmenaretrospectivestudy