Cargando…

Simplifying the ShangRing technique for circumcision in boys and men: use of the no-flip technique with randomization to removal at 7 days versus spontaneous detachment

To assess safety of the no-flip ShangRing male circumcision technique and to determine clinical course and safety of spontaneous detachment (i.e., allowing the device to fall off), we conducted a case series of no-flip ShangRing circumcision combined with a randomized controlled trial of removal 7 d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barone, Mark A, Li, Philip S, Lee, Richard K, Ouma, Daniel, Oundo, Millicent, Barasa, Mukhaye, Oketch, Jairus, Otiende, Patrick, Nyangweso, Nixon, Maina, Mary, Kiswi, Nicholas, Chirchir, Betty, Goldstein, Marc, Awori, Quentin D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6628734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30520424
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aja.aja_91_18
_version_ 1783435007763677184
author Barone, Mark A
Li, Philip S
Lee, Richard K
Ouma, Daniel
Oundo, Millicent
Barasa, Mukhaye
Oketch, Jairus
Otiende, Patrick
Nyangweso, Nixon
Maina, Mary
Kiswi, Nicholas
Chirchir, Betty
Goldstein, Marc
Awori, Quentin D
author_facet Barone, Mark A
Li, Philip S
Lee, Richard K
Ouma, Daniel
Oundo, Millicent
Barasa, Mukhaye
Oketch, Jairus
Otiende, Patrick
Nyangweso, Nixon
Maina, Mary
Kiswi, Nicholas
Chirchir, Betty
Goldstein, Marc
Awori, Quentin D
author_sort Barone, Mark A
collection PubMed
description To assess safety of the no-flip ShangRing male circumcision technique and to determine clinical course and safety of spontaneous detachment (i.e., allowing the device to fall off), we conducted a case series of no-flip ShangRing circumcision combined with a randomized controlled trial of removal 7 days postcircumcision versus spontaneous detachment at two health facilities in Kenya. The primary outcome was the safety of the no-flip technique based on moderate and severe adverse events (AEs) during the procedure and through 42-day follow-up. A main secondary outcome was clinical course and safety of spontaneous detachment. Two hundred and thirty males 10 years and older underwent no-flip circumcision; 114 randomized to 7-day removal and 116 to spontaneous detachment. All circumcisions were successfully completed. Overall 5.3% (6/114) of participants in the 7-day group and 1.7% (2/116) in the spontaneous group had an AE; with no differences when compared to the 3% AE rate in historical data from African studies using the original flip technique (P = 0.07 and P = 0.79, respectively). Overall 72.4% (84/116) of participants in the spontaneous group wore the ShangRing until it detached. Among the remaining (27.6%; 32/116), the ring was removed, primarily at the participants' request, due to pain or discomfort. There was no difference in AE rates (P = 0.169), visit day declared healed (P = 0.324), or satisfaction (P = 0.371) between randomization groups. The median time to detachment was 14.0 (IQR: 7–21, range: 5–35) days. The no-flip technique and spontaneous detachment are safe, effective, and acceptable to boys and men 10 years and older. Phimosis and penile adhesions do not limit successful ShangRing circumcision with the no-flip technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6628734
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66287342019-07-31 Simplifying the ShangRing technique for circumcision in boys and men: use of the no-flip technique with randomization to removal at 7 days versus spontaneous detachment Barone, Mark A Li, Philip S Lee, Richard K Ouma, Daniel Oundo, Millicent Barasa, Mukhaye Oketch, Jairus Otiende, Patrick Nyangweso, Nixon Maina, Mary Kiswi, Nicholas Chirchir, Betty Goldstein, Marc Awori, Quentin D Asian J Androl Original Article To assess safety of the no-flip ShangRing male circumcision technique and to determine clinical course and safety of spontaneous detachment (i.e., allowing the device to fall off), we conducted a case series of no-flip ShangRing circumcision combined with a randomized controlled trial of removal 7 days postcircumcision versus spontaneous detachment at two health facilities in Kenya. The primary outcome was the safety of the no-flip technique based on moderate and severe adverse events (AEs) during the procedure and through 42-day follow-up. A main secondary outcome was clinical course and safety of spontaneous detachment. Two hundred and thirty males 10 years and older underwent no-flip circumcision; 114 randomized to 7-day removal and 116 to spontaneous detachment. All circumcisions were successfully completed. Overall 5.3% (6/114) of participants in the 7-day group and 1.7% (2/116) in the spontaneous group had an AE; with no differences when compared to the 3% AE rate in historical data from African studies using the original flip technique (P = 0.07 and P = 0.79, respectively). Overall 72.4% (84/116) of participants in the spontaneous group wore the ShangRing until it detached. Among the remaining (27.6%; 32/116), the ring was removed, primarily at the participants' request, due to pain or discomfort. There was no difference in AE rates (P = 0.169), visit day declared healed (P = 0.324), or satisfaction (P = 0.371) between randomization groups. The median time to detachment was 14.0 (IQR: 7–21, range: 5–35) days. The no-flip technique and spontaneous detachment are safe, effective, and acceptable to boys and men 10 years and older. Phimosis and penile adhesions do not limit successful ShangRing circumcision with the no-flip technique. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 2018-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6628734/ /pubmed/30520424 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aja.aja_91_18 Text en Copyright: © The Author(s)(2018) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Barone, Mark A
Li, Philip S
Lee, Richard K
Ouma, Daniel
Oundo, Millicent
Barasa, Mukhaye
Oketch, Jairus
Otiende, Patrick
Nyangweso, Nixon
Maina, Mary
Kiswi, Nicholas
Chirchir, Betty
Goldstein, Marc
Awori, Quentin D
Simplifying the ShangRing technique for circumcision in boys and men: use of the no-flip technique with randomization to removal at 7 days versus spontaneous detachment
title Simplifying the ShangRing technique for circumcision in boys and men: use of the no-flip technique with randomization to removal at 7 days versus spontaneous detachment
title_full Simplifying the ShangRing technique for circumcision in boys and men: use of the no-flip technique with randomization to removal at 7 days versus spontaneous detachment
title_fullStr Simplifying the ShangRing technique for circumcision in boys and men: use of the no-flip technique with randomization to removal at 7 days versus spontaneous detachment
title_full_unstemmed Simplifying the ShangRing technique for circumcision in boys and men: use of the no-flip technique with randomization to removal at 7 days versus spontaneous detachment
title_short Simplifying the ShangRing technique for circumcision in boys and men: use of the no-flip technique with randomization to removal at 7 days versus spontaneous detachment
title_sort simplifying the shangring technique for circumcision in boys and men: use of the no-flip technique with randomization to removal at 7 days versus spontaneous detachment
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6628734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30520424
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aja.aja_91_18
work_keys_str_mv AT baronemarka simplifyingtheshangringtechniqueforcircumcisioninboysandmenuseofthenofliptechniquewithrandomizationtoremovalat7daysversusspontaneousdetachment
AT liphilips simplifyingtheshangringtechniqueforcircumcisioninboysandmenuseofthenofliptechniquewithrandomizationtoremovalat7daysversusspontaneousdetachment
AT leerichardk simplifyingtheshangringtechniqueforcircumcisioninboysandmenuseofthenofliptechniquewithrandomizationtoremovalat7daysversusspontaneousdetachment
AT oumadaniel simplifyingtheshangringtechniqueforcircumcisioninboysandmenuseofthenofliptechniquewithrandomizationtoremovalat7daysversusspontaneousdetachment
AT oundomillicent simplifyingtheshangringtechniqueforcircumcisioninboysandmenuseofthenofliptechniquewithrandomizationtoremovalat7daysversusspontaneousdetachment
AT barasamukhaye simplifyingtheshangringtechniqueforcircumcisioninboysandmenuseofthenofliptechniquewithrandomizationtoremovalat7daysversusspontaneousdetachment
AT oketchjairus simplifyingtheshangringtechniqueforcircumcisioninboysandmenuseofthenofliptechniquewithrandomizationtoremovalat7daysversusspontaneousdetachment
AT otiendepatrick simplifyingtheshangringtechniqueforcircumcisioninboysandmenuseofthenofliptechniquewithrandomizationtoremovalat7daysversusspontaneousdetachment
AT nyangwesonixon simplifyingtheshangringtechniqueforcircumcisioninboysandmenuseofthenofliptechniquewithrandomizationtoremovalat7daysversusspontaneousdetachment
AT mainamary simplifyingtheshangringtechniqueforcircumcisioninboysandmenuseofthenofliptechniquewithrandomizationtoremovalat7daysversusspontaneousdetachment
AT kiswinicholas simplifyingtheshangringtechniqueforcircumcisioninboysandmenuseofthenofliptechniquewithrandomizationtoremovalat7daysversusspontaneousdetachment
AT chirchirbetty simplifyingtheshangringtechniqueforcircumcisioninboysandmenuseofthenofliptechniquewithrandomizationtoremovalat7daysversusspontaneousdetachment
AT goldsteinmarc simplifyingtheshangringtechniqueforcircumcisioninboysandmenuseofthenofliptechniquewithrandomizationtoremovalat7daysversusspontaneousdetachment
AT aworiquentind simplifyingtheshangringtechniqueforcircumcisioninboysandmenuseofthenofliptechniquewithrandomizationtoremovalat7daysversusspontaneousdetachment