Cargando…

A systematic review of the international prevalence of BRCA mutation in breast cancer

A systematic review was conducted, summarizing international BRCA 1 or 2 (BRCA1/2) mutation prevalence in breast cancer. Databases (eg, Medline and Embase; N=7) and conferences were searched (January 2012 to December 2017). From 17,872 records, 70 studies were included. In 58 large (N>100) studie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Armstrong, Nigel, Ryder, Steve, Forbes, Carol, Ross, Janine, Quek, Ruben GW
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6628947/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31372057
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S206949
_version_ 1783435032299307008
author Armstrong, Nigel
Ryder, Steve
Forbes, Carol
Ross, Janine
Quek, Ruben GW
author_facet Armstrong, Nigel
Ryder, Steve
Forbes, Carol
Ross, Janine
Quek, Ruben GW
author_sort Armstrong, Nigel
collection PubMed
description A systematic review was conducted, summarizing international BRCA 1 or 2 (BRCA1/2) mutation prevalence in breast cancer. Databases (eg, Medline and Embase; N=7) and conferences were searched (January 2012 to December 2017). From 17,872 records, 70 studies were included. In 58 large (N>100) studies, BRCA1/2 mutation prevalence varied widely from 1.8% (Spain) in sporadic breast cancer to 36.9% (United States) in estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor low+ (1–9% on immunohistochemistry/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative [HER2-]) breast cancer. In 2 large studies unselected for family history, ethnicity, sex, or age and no/unclear selection by breast cancer stage or hormone receptor (HR) status, germline BRCA (gBRCA) mutation prevalence was 2.9% (Italy) to 3.0% (South Korea). In the 4 large unselected triple-negative breast cancer studies, gBRCA mutation prevalence varied from 9.3% (Australia) to 15.4% (United States). gBRCA mutation prevalence in 1 large unselected HR positive/HER2- early breast cancer study was 5% (United States). In 2 large unselected metastatic breast cancer studies, gBRCA mutation prevalence was 2.7% (France) and 4.3% (Germany). Locally advanced breast cancer studies were small and not in unselected populations. Poor reporting of gBRCA status and basis of selection implies a need for further large well-reported BRCA mutation prevalence studies in breast cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6628947
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66289472019-08-01 A systematic review of the international prevalence of BRCA mutation in breast cancer Armstrong, Nigel Ryder, Steve Forbes, Carol Ross, Janine Quek, Ruben GW Clin Epidemiol Review A systematic review was conducted, summarizing international BRCA 1 or 2 (BRCA1/2) mutation prevalence in breast cancer. Databases (eg, Medline and Embase; N=7) and conferences were searched (January 2012 to December 2017). From 17,872 records, 70 studies were included. In 58 large (N>100) studies, BRCA1/2 mutation prevalence varied widely from 1.8% (Spain) in sporadic breast cancer to 36.9% (United States) in estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor low+ (1–9% on immunohistochemistry/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative [HER2-]) breast cancer. In 2 large studies unselected for family history, ethnicity, sex, or age and no/unclear selection by breast cancer stage or hormone receptor (HR) status, germline BRCA (gBRCA) mutation prevalence was 2.9% (Italy) to 3.0% (South Korea). In the 4 large unselected triple-negative breast cancer studies, gBRCA mutation prevalence varied from 9.3% (Australia) to 15.4% (United States). gBRCA mutation prevalence in 1 large unselected HR positive/HER2- early breast cancer study was 5% (United States). In 2 large unselected metastatic breast cancer studies, gBRCA mutation prevalence was 2.7% (France) and 4.3% (Germany). Locally advanced breast cancer studies were small and not in unselected populations. Poor reporting of gBRCA status and basis of selection implies a need for further large well-reported BRCA mutation prevalence studies in breast cancer. Dove 2019-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6628947/ /pubmed/31372057 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S206949 Text en © 2019 Armstrong et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Review
Armstrong, Nigel
Ryder, Steve
Forbes, Carol
Ross, Janine
Quek, Ruben GW
A systematic review of the international prevalence of BRCA mutation in breast cancer
title A systematic review of the international prevalence of BRCA mutation in breast cancer
title_full A systematic review of the international prevalence of BRCA mutation in breast cancer
title_fullStr A systematic review of the international prevalence of BRCA mutation in breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review of the international prevalence of BRCA mutation in breast cancer
title_short A systematic review of the international prevalence of BRCA mutation in breast cancer
title_sort systematic review of the international prevalence of brca mutation in breast cancer
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6628947/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31372057
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S206949
work_keys_str_mv AT armstrongnigel asystematicreviewoftheinternationalprevalenceofbrcamutationinbreastcancer
AT rydersteve asystematicreviewoftheinternationalprevalenceofbrcamutationinbreastcancer
AT forbescarol asystematicreviewoftheinternationalprevalenceofbrcamutationinbreastcancer
AT rossjanine asystematicreviewoftheinternationalprevalenceofbrcamutationinbreastcancer
AT quekrubengw asystematicreviewoftheinternationalprevalenceofbrcamutationinbreastcancer
AT armstrongnigel systematicreviewoftheinternationalprevalenceofbrcamutationinbreastcancer
AT rydersteve systematicreviewoftheinternationalprevalenceofbrcamutationinbreastcancer
AT forbescarol systematicreviewoftheinternationalprevalenceofbrcamutationinbreastcancer
AT rossjanine systematicreviewoftheinternationalprevalenceofbrcamutationinbreastcancer
AT quekrubengw systematicreviewoftheinternationalprevalenceofbrcamutationinbreastcancer