Cargando…

Advantages of large medical record database for outcomes research: Insights into post‐menopausal hormone therapy

Approximately 25 years ago, our team initiated studies to determine whether outcome results from a large medical record database would yield valid results. We utilized the data in the United Kingdom (UK) General Practice Research Database (GPRD) to replicate the randomized controlled trial (RCT) stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tannen, Richard L., Barnhart, Kurt T., Rubin, Joshua C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6628979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31317074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10193
_version_ 1783435039448498176
author Tannen, Richard L.
Barnhart, Kurt T.
Rubin, Joshua C.
author_facet Tannen, Richard L.
Barnhart, Kurt T.
Rubin, Joshua C.
author_sort Tannen, Richard L.
collection PubMed
description Approximately 25 years ago, our team initiated studies to determine whether outcome results from a large medical record database would yield valid results. We utilized the data in the United Kingdom (UK) General Practice Research Database (GPRD) to replicate the randomized controlled trial (RCT) study result and compared them to confirm the database results. The initial studies compared favorably, but some subsequent studies did not. This prompted development of a new strategy to determine and correct for unrecognized confounding in the database. This strategy divided outcome rates prior to initiation of therapy in the database study (which should include both identified and unidentified confounders) into the outcome rates during the treatment interval. When they differed from Cox‐adjusted results, it reflected unrecognized confounding. We called this strategy Prior Event Rate Ratio (PERR)–adjusted outcome. One of our previously published observational studies replicated the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) RCT study of hormone therapy in post‐menopausal women. Our study results replicated the WHI RCT results except it did not exhibit an increase in heart attack in contrast to the RCT. Furthermore, we could not evaluate death reliably since our analytic approach to overcome unrecognized confounding does not work for this outcome. In Volume 1, Issue 1 of the Learning Health Systems open access journal, we published a new study (titled “A new method to address unmeasured confounding of mortality in observational studies”) that reported a novel death method, based on our prior methodology, that could analyze unrecognized confounding of the death outcome. This new methodology, termed Post Treatment Event Rate Ratio (PTERR), permitted a reliable examination of mortality in post‐menopausal women undergoing hormone therapy. These results are reported in this manuscript. The study used the data from our previous observational study. It demonstrates that estrogen therapy markedly reduced death in post‐menopausal women. This work also illuminates principles of database construction and correspondingly demonstrates the use of novel methodologies for obtaining valid results, which can be applied to enable learning from such databases. Work to advance such methodologies is essential to advancing the scientific integrity Core Value underpinning learning health systems (LHSs). Indeed, in the absence of such efforts to develop and refine methodologies for learning trustworthy lessons from real‐world data, we risk inadvertently creating mis‐learning systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6628979
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66289792019-07-17 Advantages of large medical record database for outcomes research: Insights into post‐menopausal hormone therapy Tannen, Richard L. Barnhart, Kurt T. Rubin, Joshua C. Learn Health Syst Research Reports Approximately 25 years ago, our team initiated studies to determine whether outcome results from a large medical record database would yield valid results. We utilized the data in the United Kingdom (UK) General Practice Research Database (GPRD) to replicate the randomized controlled trial (RCT) study result and compared them to confirm the database results. The initial studies compared favorably, but some subsequent studies did not. This prompted development of a new strategy to determine and correct for unrecognized confounding in the database. This strategy divided outcome rates prior to initiation of therapy in the database study (which should include both identified and unidentified confounders) into the outcome rates during the treatment interval. When they differed from Cox‐adjusted results, it reflected unrecognized confounding. We called this strategy Prior Event Rate Ratio (PERR)–adjusted outcome. One of our previously published observational studies replicated the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) RCT study of hormone therapy in post‐menopausal women. Our study results replicated the WHI RCT results except it did not exhibit an increase in heart attack in contrast to the RCT. Furthermore, we could not evaluate death reliably since our analytic approach to overcome unrecognized confounding does not work for this outcome. In Volume 1, Issue 1 of the Learning Health Systems open access journal, we published a new study (titled “A new method to address unmeasured confounding of mortality in observational studies”) that reported a novel death method, based on our prior methodology, that could analyze unrecognized confounding of the death outcome. This new methodology, termed Post Treatment Event Rate Ratio (PTERR), permitted a reliable examination of mortality in post‐menopausal women undergoing hormone therapy. These results are reported in this manuscript. The study used the data from our previous observational study. It demonstrates that estrogen therapy markedly reduced death in post‐menopausal women. This work also illuminates principles of database construction and correspondingly demonstrates the use of novel methodologies for obtaining valid results, which can be applied to enable learning from such databases. Work to advance such methodologies is essential to advancing the scientific integrity Core Value underpinning learning health systems (LHSs). Indeed, in the absence of such efforts to develop and refine methodologies for learning trustworthy lessons from real‐world data, we risk inadvertently creating mis‐learning systems. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6628979/ /pubmed/31317074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10193 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Learning Health Systems published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the University of Michigan This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research Reports
Tannen, Richard L.
Barnhart, Kurt T.
Rubin, Joshua C.
Advantages of large medical record database for outcomes research: Insights into post‐menopausal hormone therapy
title Advantages of large medical record database for outcomes research: Insights into post‐menopausal hormone therapy
title_full Advantages of large medical record database for outcomes research: Insights into post‐menopausal hormone therapy
title_fullStr Advantages of large medical record database for outcomes research: Insights into post‐menopausal hormone therapy
title_full_unstemmed Advantages of large medical record database for outcomes research: Insights into post‐menopausal hormone therapy
title_short Advantages of large medical record database for outcomes research: Insights into post‐menopausal hormone therapy
title_sort advantages of large medical record database for outcomes research: insights into post‐menopausal hormone therapy
topic Research Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6628979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31317074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10193
work_keys_str_mv AT tannenrichardl advantagesoflargemedicalrecorddatabaseforoutcomesresearchinsightsintopostmenopausalhormonetherapy
AT barnhartkurtt advantagesoflargemedicalrecorddatabaseforoutcomesresearchinsightsintopostmenopausalhormonetherapy
AT rubinjoshuac advantagesoflargemedicalrecorddatabaseforoutcomesresearchinsightsintopostmenopausalhormonetherapy