Cargando…

NONINVASIVE TEAR FILM BREAK-UP TIME ASSESSMENT USING HANDHELD LIPID LAYER EXAMINATION INSTRUMENT

The aim was to determine feasibility and reliability of noninvasive tear break-up time (NIBUT) assessment using handheld lipid layer examination instrument, and to compare it with standard tear break-up time (TBUT) test. Fifty patients were enrolled, 31 with and 19 without dry eye symptoms. Schein q...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vidas Pauk, Sania, Petriček, Igor, Jukić, Tomislav, Popović-Suić, Smiljka, Tomić, Martina, Kalauz, Miro, Jandroković, Sonja, Masnec, Sanja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medical Research, Vinogradska cesta c. 29 Zagreb 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6629192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31363327
http://dx.doi.org/10.20471/acc.2019.58.01.09
_version_ 1783435065456328704
author Vidas Pauk, Sania
Petriček, Igor
Jukić, Tomislav
Popović-Suić, Smiljka
Tomić, Martina
Kalauz, Miro
Jandroković, Sonja
Masnec, Sanja
author_facet Vidas Pauk, Sania
Petriček, Igor
Jukić, Tomislav
Popović-Suić, Smiljka
Tomić, Martina
Kalauz, Miro
Jandroković, Sonja
Masnec, Sanja
author_sort Vidas Pauk, Sania
collection PubMed
description The aim was to determine feasibility and reliability of noninvasive tear break-up time (NIBUT) assessment using handheld lipid layer examination instrument, and to compare it with standard tear break-up time (TBUT) test. Fifty patients were enrolled, 31 with and 19 without dry eye symptoms. Schein questionnaire was used to assess dry eye symptoms. During examination, three NIBUT measurements were performed on each eye using handheld instrument, followed by three TBUT measurements. Receiver operating characteristic curves, sensitivity, specificity and logistic regression analysis were generated. Median NIBUT values were significantly shorter in dry eye symptom group than in control group in all three measurements (9, 8 and 8 s vs. 21, 22 and 21 s; p<0.001). TBUT values showed no significant difference between the groups in the first measurement (p=0.053), but the values were significantly shorter in dry eye symptom group in second and third measurements (p=0.020). The cutoff value to distinguish patients with symptoms of dry eye from control group was 12 seconds for NIBUT and 8 seconds for TBUT, with NIBUT having significantly higher sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and positive predictive value. NIBUT, measured by handheld lipid layer examination instrument, was superior to TBUT in detecting dry eye.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6629192
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medical Research, Vinogradska cesta c. 29 Zagreb
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66291922019-07-30 NONINVASIVE TEAR FILM BREAK-UP TIME ASSESSMENT USING HANDHELD LIPID LAYER EXAMINATION INSTRUMENT Vidas Pauk, Sania Petriček, Igor Jukić, Tomislav Popović-Suić, Smiljka Tomić, Martina Kalauz, Miro Jandroković, Sonja Masnec, Sanja Acta Clin Croat Original Scientific Papers The aim was to determine feasibility and reliability of noninvasive tear break-up time (NIBUT) assessment using handheld lipid layer examination instrument, and to compare it with standard tear break-up time (TBUT) test. Fifty patients were enrolled, 31 with and 19 without dry eye symptoms. Schein questionnaire was used to assess dry eye symptoms. During examination, three NIBUT measurements were performed on each eye using handheld instrument, followed by three TBUT measurements. Receiver operating characteristic curves, sensitivity, specificity and logistic regression analysis were generated. Median NIBUT values were significantly shorter in dry eye symptom group than in control group in all three measurements (9, 8 and 8 s vs. 21, 22 and 21 s; p<0.001). TBUT values showed no significant difference between the groups in the first measurement (p=0.053), but the values were significantly shorter in dry eye symptom group in second and third measurements (p=0.020). The cutoff value to distinguish patients with symptoms of dry eye from control group was 12 seconds for NIBUT and 8 seconds for TBUT, with NIBUT having significantly higher sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and positive predictive value. NIBUT, measured by handheld lipid layer examination instrument, was superior to TBUT in detecting dry eye. Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medical Research, Vinogradska cesta c. 29 Zagreb 2019-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6629192/ /pubmed/31363327 http://dx.doi.org/10.20471/acc.2019.58.01.09 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 License.
spellingShingle Original Scientific Papers
Vidas Pauk, Sania
Petriček, Igor
Jukić, Tomislav
Popović-Suić, Smiljka
Tomić, Martina
Kalauz, Miro
Jandroković, Sonja
Masnec, Sanja
NONINVASIVE TEAR FILM BREAK-UP TIME ASSESSMENT USING HANDHELD LIPID LAYER EXAMINATION INSTRUMENT
title NONINVASIVE TEAR FILM BREAK-UP TIME ASSESSMENT USING HANDHELD LIPID LAYER EXAMINATION INSTRUMENT
title_full NONINVASIVE TEAR FILM BREAK-UP TIME ASSESSMENT USING HANDHELD LIPID LAYER EXAMINATION INSTRUMENT
title_fullStr NONINVASIVE TEAR FILM BREAK-UP TIME ASSESSMENT USING HANDHELD LIPID LAYER EXAMINATION INSTRUMENT
title_full_unstemmed NONINVASIVE TEAR FILM BREAK-UP TIME ASSESSMENT USING HANDHELD LIPID LAYER EXAMINATION INSTRUMENT
title_short NONINVASIVE TEAR FILM BREAK-UP TIME ASSESSMENT USING HANDHELD LIPID LAYER EXAMINATION INSTRUMENT
title_sort noninvasive tear film break-up time assessment using handheld lipid layer examination instrument
topic Original Scientific Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6629192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31363327
http://dx.doi.org/10.20471/acc.2019.58.01.09
work_keys_str_mv AT vidaspauksania noninvasivetearfilmbreakuptimeassessmentusinghandheldlipidlayerexaminationinstrument
AT petricekigor noninvasivetearfilmbreakuptimeassessmentusinghandheldlipidlayerexaminationinstrument
AT jukictomislav noninvasivetearfilmbreakuptimeassessmentusinghandheldlipidlayerexaminationinstrument
AT popovicsuicsmiljka noninvasivetearfilmbreakuptimeassessmentusinghandheldlipidlayerexaminationinstrument
AT tomicmartina noninvasivetearfilmbreakuptimeassessmentusinghandheldlipidlayerexaminationinstrument
AT kalauzmiro noninvasivetearfilmbreakuptimeassessmentusinghandheldlipidlayerexaminationinstrument
AT jandrokovicsonja noninvasivetearfilmbreakuptimeassessmentusinghandheldlipidlayerexaminationinstrument
AT masnecsanja noninvasivetearfilmbreakuptimeassessmentusinghandheldlipidlayerexaminationinstrument