Cargando…

Application of a novel porous tantalum implant in rabbit anterior lumbar spine fusion model: in vitro and in vivo experiments

BACKGROUND: Some porous materials have been developed to enhance biologic fusion of the implants to bone in spine fusion surgeries. However, there are several inherent limitations. In this study, a novel biomedical porous tantalum was applied to in vitro and in vivo experiments to test its biocompat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lu, Ming, Xu, Song, Lei, Zi-Xiong, Lu, Dong, Cao, Wei, Huttula, Marko, Hou, Chang-He, Du, Shao-Hua, Chen, Wei, Dai, Shuang-Wu, Li, Hao-Miao, Jin, Da-Di
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6629310/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30628959
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000000030
_version_ 1783435083550556160
author Lu, Ming
Xu, Song
Lei, Zi-Xiong
Lu, Dong
Cao, Wei
Huttula, Marko
Hou, Chang-He
Du, Shao-Hua
Chen, Wei
Dai, Shuang-Wu
Li, Hao-Miao
Jin, Da-Di
author_facet Lu, Ming
Xu, Song
Lei, Zi-Xiong
Lu, Dong
Cao, Wei
Huttula, Marko
Hou, Chang-He
Du, Shao-Hua
Chen, Wei
Dai, Shuang-Wu
Li, Hao-Miao
Jin, Da-Di
author_sort Lu, Ming
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Some porous materials have been developed to enhance biologic fusion of the implants to bone in spine fusion surgeries. However, there are several inherent limitations. In this study, a novel biomedical porous tantalum was applied to in vitro and in vivo experiments to test its biocompatibility and osteocompatibility. METHODS: Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) were cultured on porous tantalum implant. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) and Cell Counting Kit-8 assay were used to evaluate the cell toxicity and biocompatibility. Twenty-four rabbits were performed discectomy only (control group), discectomy with autologous bone implanted (autograft group), and discectomy with porous tantalum implanted (tantalum group) at 3 levels: L3–L4, L4–L5, and L5–L6 in random order. All the 24 rabbits were randomly sacrificed at the different post-operative times (2, 4, 6, and 12 months; n = 6 at each time point). Histologic examination and micro-computed tomography scans were done to evaluate the fusion process. Comparison of fusion index scores between groups was analyzed using one-way analysis of variance. Other comparisons of numerical variables between groups were made by Student t test. RESULTS: All rabbits survived and recovered without any symptoms of nerve injury. Radiographic fusion index scores at 12 months post-operatively between autograft and tantalum groups showed no significant difference (2.89 ± 0.32 vs. 2.83 ± 0.38, F = 244.60, P = 0.709). Cell Counting Kit-8 assay showed no significant difference of absorbance values between the leaching liquor group and control group (1.25 ± 0.06 vs. 1.23 ± 0.04, t = –0.644, P = 0.545), which indicated the BMSC proliferation without toxicity. SEM images showed that these cells had irregular shapes with long spindles adhered to the surface of tantalum implant. No implant degradation, wear debris, or osteolysis was observed. Histologic results showed solid fusion in the porous tantalum and autologous bone implanted intervertebral spaces. CONCLUSION: This novel porous tantalum implant showed a good biocompatibility and osteocompatibility, which could be a valid biomaterial for interbody fusion cages.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6629310
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66293102019-07-22 Application of a novel porous tantalum implant in rabbit anterior lumbar spine fusion model: in vitro and in vivo experiments Lu, Ming Xu, Song Lei, Zi-Xiong Lu, Dong Cao, Wei Huttula, Marko Hou, Chang-He Du, Shao-Hua Chen, Wei Dai, Shuang-Wu Li, Hao-Miao Jin, Da-Di Chin Med J (Engl) Original Articles BACKGROUND: Some porous materials have been developed to enhance biologic fusion of the implants to bone in spine fusion surgeries. However, there are several inherent limitations. In this study, a novel biomedical porous tantalum was applied to in vitro and in vivo experiments to test its biocompatibility and osteocompatibility. METHODS: Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) were cultured on porous tantalum implant. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) and Cell Counting Kit-8 assay were used to evaluate the cell toxicity and biocompatibility. Twenty-four rabbits were performed discectomy only (control group), discectomy with autologous bone implanted (autograft group), and discectomy with porous tantalum implanted (tantalum group) at 3 levels: L3–L4, L4–L5, and L5–L6 in random order. All the 24 rabbits were randomly sacrificed at the different post-operative times (2, 4, 6, and 12 months; n = 6 at each time point). Histologic examination and micro-computed tomography scans were done to evaluate the fusion process. Comparison of fusion index scores between groups was analyzed using one-way analysis of variance. Other comparisons of numerical variables between groups were made by Student t test. RESULTS: All rabbits survived and recovered without any symptoms of nerve injury. Radiographic fusion index scores at 12 months post-operatively between autograft and tantalum groups showed no significant difference (2.89 ± 0.32 vs. 2.83 ± 0.38, F = 244.60, P = 0.709). Cell Counting Kit-8 assay showed no significant difference of absorbance values between the leaching liquor group and control group (1.25 ± 0.06 vs. 1.23 ± 0.04, t = –0.644, P = 0.545), which indicated the BMSC proliferation without toxicity. SEM images showed that these cells had irregular shapes with long spindles adhered to the surface of tantalum implant. No implant degradation, wear debris, or osteolysis was observed. Histologic results showed solid fusion in the porous tantalum and autologous bone implanted intervertebral spaces. CONCLUSION: This novel porous tantalum implant showed a good biocompatibility and osteocompatibility, which could be a valid biomaterial for interbody fusion cages. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-01-05 2019-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6629310/ /pubmed/30628959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000000030 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Chinese Medical Association, produced by Wolters Kluwer, Inc. under the CC-BY-NC-ND license. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle Original Articles
Lu, Ming
Xu, Song
Lei, Zi-Xiong
Lu, Dong
Cao, Wei
Huttula, Marko
Hou, Chang-He
Du, Shao-Hua
Chen, Wei
Dai, Shuang-Wu
Li, Hao-Miao
Jin, Da-Di
Application of a novel porous tantalum implant in rabbit anterior lumbar spine fusion model: in vitro and in vivo experiments
title Application of a novel porous tantalum implant in rabbit anterior lumbar spine fusion model: in vitro and in vivo experiments
title_full Application of a novel porous tantalum implant in rabbit anterior lumbar spine fusion model: in vitro and in vivo experiments
title_fullStr Application of a novel porous tantalum implant in rabbit anterior lumbar spine fusion model: in vitro and in vivo experiments
title_full_unstemmed Application of a novel porous tantalum implant in rabbit anterior lumbar spine fusion model: in vitro and in vivo experiments
title_short Application of a novel porous tantalum implant in rabbit anterior lumbar spine fusion model: in vitro and in vivo experiments
title_sort application of a novel porous tantalum implant in rabbit anterior lumbar spine fusion model: in vitro and in vivo experiments
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6629310/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30628959
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000000030
work_keys_str_mv AT luming applicationofanovelporoustantalumimplantinrabbitanteriorlumbarspinefusionmodelinvitroandinvivoexperiments
AT xusong applicationofanovelporoustantalumimplantinrabbitanteriorlumbarspinefusionmodelinvitroandinvivoexperiments
AT leizixiong applicationofanovelporoustantalumimplantinrabbitanteriorlumbarspinefusionmodelinvitroandinvivoexperiments
AT ludong applicationofanovelporoustantalumimplantinrabbitanteriorlumbarspinefusionmodelinvitroandinvivoexperiments
AT caowei applicationofanovelporoustantalumimplantinrabbitanteriorlumbarspinefusionmodelinvitroandinvivoexperiments
AT huttulamarko applicationofanovelporoustantalumimplantinrabbitanteriorlumbarspinefusionmodelinvitroandinvivoexperiments
AT houchanghe applicationofanovelporoustantalumimplantinrabbitanteriorlumbarspinefusionmodelinvitroandinvivoexperiments
AT dushaohua applicationofanovelporoustantalumimplantinrabbitanteriorlumbarspinefusionmodelinvitroandinvivoexperiments
AT chenwei applicationofanovelporoustantalumimplantinrabbitanteriorlumbarspinefusionmodelinvitroandinvivoexperiments
AT daishuangwu applicationofanovelporoustantalumimplantinrabbitanteriorlumbarspinefusionmodelinvitroandinvivoexperiments
AT lihaomiao applicationofanovelporoustantalumimplantinrabbitanteriorlumbarspinefusionmodelinvitroandinvivoexperiments
AT jindadi applicationofanovelporoustantalumimplantinrabbitanteriorlumbarspinefusionmodelinvitroandinvivoexperiments