Cargando…

Right versus left thoracic approach oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

INTRODUCTION: Oesophageal cancer is one of the most common malignant tumours and has been identified as one of the leading causes of cancer death worldwide. Surgery is considered to be the optimal treatment for patients with resectable oesophageal cancer. Oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer can si...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chai, Tianci, Shen, Zhimin, Chen, Sui, Lin, Yuhan, Zhang, Zhenyang, Lin, Wenwei, Hong, Junjie, Yang, Chuangcai, Kang, Mingqiang, Lin, Jiangbo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6629400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31289096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030157
_version_ 1783435104670973952
author Chai, Tianci
Shen, Zhimin
Chen, Sui
Lin, Yuhan
Zhang, Zhenyang
Lin, Wenwei
Hong, Junjie
Yang, Chuangcai
Kang, Mingqiang
Lin, Jiangbo
author_facet Chai, Tianci
Shen, Zhimin
Chen, Sui
Lin, Yuhan
Zhang, Zhenyang
Lin, Wenwei
Hong, Junjie
Yang, Chuangcai
Kang, Mingqiang
Lin, Jiangbo
author_sort Chai, Tianci
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Oesophageal cancer is one of the most common malignant tumours and has been identified as one of the leading causes of cancer death worldwide. Surgery is considered to be the optimal treatment for patients with resectable oesophageal cancer. Oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer can significantly extend the survival period of patients and provide a potential opportunity for a cure. However, there is still controversy regarding which thoracic approach (right or left) during oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer can lead to better surgical outcomes globally. This systematic review and meta-analysis will be performed to determine which thoracic approach during oesophagectomy will achieve longer patient survival and will be more beneficial for patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cancerlit, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Google Scholar databases for relevant clinical trials published in any language before 1 October 2019. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs, propensity score-matched comparative studies and prospective cohort studies of interest, published or unpublished, that meet the inclusion criteria will be included. Subgroup analysis of the type of operation, tumour pathological stage and ethnicity will be performed. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019124133. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Because this study will be based on published or unpublished records and studies, there is no need for ethics approval. The results of the study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6629400
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66294002019-07-30 Right versus left thoracic approach oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol Chai, Tianci Shen, Zhimin Chen, Sui Lin, Yuhan Zhang, Zhenyang Lin, Wenwei Hong, Junjie Yang, Chuangcai Kang, Mingqiang Lin, Jiangbo BMJ Open Surgery INTRODUCTION: Oesophageal cancer is one of the most common malignant tumours and has been identified as one of the leading causes of cancer death worldwide. Surgery is considered to be the optimal treatment for patients with resectable oesophageal cancer. Oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer can significantly extend the survival period of patients and provide a potential opportunity for a cure. However, there is still controversy regarding which thoracic approach (right or left) during oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer can lead to better surgical outcomes globally. This systematic review and meta-analysis will be performed to determine which thoracic approach during oesophagectomy will achieve longer patient survival and will be more beneficial for patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cancerlit, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Google Scholar databases for relevant clinical trials published in any language before 1 October 2019. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs, propensity score-matched comparative studies and prospective cohort studies of interest, published or unpublished, that meet the inclusion criteria will be included. Subgroup analysis of the type of operation, tumour pathological stage and ethnicity will be performed. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019124133. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Because this study will be based on published or unpublished records and studies, there is no need for ethics approval. The results of the study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6629400/ /pubmed/31289096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030157 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Surgery
Chai, Tianci
Shen, Zhimin
Chen, Sui
Lin, Yuhan
Zhang, Zhenyang
Lin, Wenwei
Hong, Junjie
Yang, Chuangcai
Kang, Mingqiang
Lin, Jiangbo
Right versus left thoracic approach oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
title Right versus left thoracic approach oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
title_full Right versus left thoracic approach oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
title_fullStr Right versus left thoracic approach oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
title_full_unstemmed Right versus left thoracic approach oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
title_short Right versus left thoracic approach oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
title_sort right versus left thoracic approach oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6629400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31289096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030157
work_keys_str_mv AT chaitianci rightversusleftthoracicapproachoesophagectomyforoesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocol
AT shenzhimin rightversusleftthoracicapproachoesophagectomyforoesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocol
AT chensui rightversusleftthoracicapproachoesophagectomyforoesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocol
AT linyuhan rightversusleftthoracicapproachoesophagectomyforoesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocol
AT zhangzhenyang rightversusleftthoracicapproachoesophagectomyforoesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocol
AT linwenwei rightversusleftthoracicapproachoesophagectomyforoesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocol
AT hongjunjie rightversusleftthoracicapproachoesophagectomyforoesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocol
AT yangchuangcai rightversusleftthoracicapproachoesophagectomyforoesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocol
AT kangmingqiang rightversusleftthoracicapproachoesophagectomyforoesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocol
AT linjiangbo rightversusleftthoracicapproachoesophagectomyforoesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocol