Cargando…
Right versus left thoracic approach oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
INTRODUCTION: Oesophageal cancer is one of the most common malignant tumours and has been identified as one of the leading causes of cancer death worldwide. Surgery is considered to be the optimal treatment for patients with resectable oesophageal cancer. Oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer can si...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6629400/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31289096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030157 |
_version_ | 1783435104670973952 |
---|---|
author | Chai, Tianci Shen, Zhimin Chen, Sui Lin, Yuhan Zhang, Zhenyang Lin, Wenwei Hong, Junjie Yang, Chuangcai Kang, Mingqiang Lin, Jiangbo |
author_facet | Chai, Tianci Shen, Zhimin Chen, Sui Lin, Yuhan Zhang, Zhenyang Lin, Wenwei Hong, Junjie Yang, Chuangcai Kang, Mingqiang Lin, Jiangbo |
author_sort | Chai, Tianci |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Oesophageal cancer is one of the most common malignant tumours and has been identified as one of the leading causes of cancer death worldwide. Surgery is considered to be the optimal treatment for patients with resectable oesophageal cancer. Oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer can significantly extend the survival period of patients and provide a potential opportunity for a cure. However, there is still controversy regarding which thoracic approach (right or left) during oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer can lead to better surgical outcomes globally. This systematic review and meta-analysis will be performed to determine which thoracic approach during oesophagectomy will achieve longer patient survival and will be more beneficial for patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cancerlit, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Google Scholar databases for relevant clinical trials published in any language before 1 October 2019. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs, propensity score-matched comparative studies and prospective cohort studies of interest, published or unpublished, that meet the inclusion criteria will be included. Subgroup analysis of the type of operation, tumour pathological stage and ethnicity will be performed. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019124133. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Because this study will be based on published or unpublished records and studies, there is no need for ethics approval. The results of the study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6629400 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66294002019-07-30 Right versus left thoracic approach oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol Chai, Tianci Shen, Zhimin Chen, Sui Lin, Yuhan Zhang, Zhenyang Lin, Wenwei Hong, Junjie Yang, Chuangcai Kang, Mingqiang Lin, Jiangbo BMJ Open Surgery INTRODUCTION: Oesophageal cancer is one of the most common malignant tumours and has been identified as one of the leading causes of cancer death worldwide. Surgery is considered to be the optimal treatment for patients with resectable oesophageal cancer. Oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer can significantly extend the survival period of patients and provide a potential opportunity for a cure. However, there is still controversy regarding which thoracic approach (right or left) during oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer can lead to better surgical outcomes globally. This systematic review and meta-analysis will be performed to determine which thoracic approach during oesophagectomy will achieve longer patient survival and will be more beneficial for patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cancerlit, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Google Scholar databases for relevant clinical trials published in any language before 1 October 2019. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs, propensity score-matched comparative studies and prospective cohort studies of interest, published or unpublished, that meet the inclusion criteria will be included. Subgroup analysis of the type of operation, tumour pathological stage and ethnicity will be performed. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019124133. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Because this study will be based on published or unpublished records and studies, there is no need for ethics approval. The results of the study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6629400/ /pubmed/31289096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030157 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Surgery Chai, Tianci Shen, Zhimin Chen, Sui Lin, Yuhan Zhang, Zhenyang Lin, Wenwei Hong, Junjie Yang, Chuangcai Kang, Mingqiang Lin, Jiangbo Right versus left thoracic approach oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol |
title | Right versus left thoracic approach oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol |
title_full | Right versus left thoracic approach oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol |
title_fullStr | Right versus left thoracic approach oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Right versus left thoracic approach oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol |
title_short | Right versus left thoracic approach oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol |
title_sort | right versus left thoracic approach oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6629400/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31289096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030157 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chaitianci rightversusleftthoracicapproachoesophagectomyforoesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocol AT shenzhimin rightversusleftthoracicapproachoesophagectomyforoesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocol AT chensui rightversusleftthoracicapproachoesophagectomyforoesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocol AT linyuhan rightversusleftthoracicapproachoesophagectomyforoesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocol AT zhangzhenyang rightversusleftthoracicapproachoesophagectomyforoesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocol AT linwenwei rightversusleftthoracicapproachoesophagectomyforoesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocol AT hongjunjie rightversusleftthoracicapproachoesophagectomyforoesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocol AT yangchuangcai rightversusleftthoracicapproachoesophagectomyforoesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocol AT kangmingqiang rightversusleftthoracicapproachoesophagectomyforoesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocol AT linjiangbo rightversusleftthoracicapproachoesophagectomyforoesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisprotocol |