Cargando…

Apnoeic oxygenation with nasal cannula oxygen at different flow rates in anaesthetised patients: a study protocol for a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION: Apnoeic oxygenation using nasal high-flow oxygen delivery systems with heated and humidified oxygen has recently gained popularity in the anaesthesia community. It has been shown to allow a prolonged apnoea time of up to 65 min as CO(2) increase was far slower compared with previously...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Theiler, Lorenz, Schneeberg, Fabian, Riedel, Thomas, Kaiser, Heiko, Riva, Thomas, Greif, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6629420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31300494
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025442
_version_ 1783435109471354880
author Theiler, Lorenz
Schneeberg, Fabian
Riedel, Thomas
Kaiser, Heiko
Riva, Thomas
Greif, Robert
author_facet Theiler, Lorenz
Schneeberg, Fabian
Riedel, Thomas
Kaiser, Heiko
Riva, Thomas
Greif, Robert
author_sort Theiler, Lorenz
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Apnoeic oxygenation using nasal high-flow oxygen delivery systems with heated and humidified oxygen has recently gained popularity in the anaesthesia community. It has been shown to allow a prolonged apnoea time of up to 65 min as CO(2) increase was far slower compared with previously reported data from CO(2) increase during apnoea. A ventilatory exchange due to the high nasal oxygen flow was proposed explaining that phenomenon. However, recent studies in children did not show any difference in CO(2) clearance comparing high-flow with low-flow oxygen. To investigate this ventilatory exchange in adults, we plan this study comparing different oxygen flow rates and the increase of CO(2) during apnoea. We hypothesise that CO(2) clearance is non-inferior when applying low oxygen flow rates. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this single-centre, single-blinded, randomised controlled trial, we randomly assign 100 patients planned for elective surgery to either control (oxygen 70 L/min, airway opened by laryngoscopy) or one of three intervention groups: oxygen 70, or 10, or 2 L/min, all with jaw thrust to secure airway patency. After anaesthesia induction and neuromuscular blockage, either one of the interventions or the control will be applied according to randomisation. Throughout the apnoea period, we will measure the increase of transcutaneous pCO(2) (tcpCO(2)) until any one of the following criteria is met: time=15 min, SpO(2) <92%, tcpCO(2) >10.67 kPa, art. pH <7.1, K(+) >6.0 mmol/L. Primary outcome is the mean tcpCO(2) increase in kPa/min. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: After Cantonal Ethic Committee of Bern approval (ID 2018–00293, 22.03.2018), all study participants will provide written informed consent. Patients vulnerable towards hypoxia or hypercarbia are excluded. Study results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This study was registered on www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03478774, Pre-results) and the Swiss Trial Registry KOFAM (SNCTP000002861).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6629420
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66294202019-07-30 Apnoeic oxygenation with nasal cannula oxygen at different flow rates in anaesthetised patients: a study protocol for a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial Theiler, Lorenz Schneeberg, Fabian Riedel, Thomas Kaiser, Heiko Riva, Thomas Greif, Robert BMJ Open Anaesthesia INTRODUCTION: Apnoeic oxygenation using nasal high-flow oxygen delivery systems with heated and humidified oxygen has recently gained popularity in the anaesthesia community. It has been shown to allow a prolonged apnoea time of up to 65 min as CO(2) increase was far slower compared with previously reported data from CO(2) increase during apnoea. A ventilatory exchange due to the high nasal oxygen flow was proposed explaining that phenomenon. However, recent studies in children did not show any difference in CO(2) clearance comparing high-flow with low-flow oxygen. To investigate this ventilatory exchange in adults, we plan this study comparing different oxygen flow rates and the increase of CO(2) during apnoea. We hypothesise that CO(2) clearance is non-inferior when applying low oxygen flow rates. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this single-centre, single-blinded, randomised controlled trial, we randomly assign 100 patients planned for elective surgery to either control (oxygen 70 L/min, airway opened by laryngoscopy) or one of three intervention groups: oxygen 70, or 10, or 2 L/min, all with jaw thrust to secure airway patency. After anaesthesia induction and neuromuscular blockage, either one of the interventions or the control will be applied according to randomisation. Throughout the apnoea period, we will measure the increase of transcutaneous pCO(2) (tcpCO(2)) until any one of the following criteria is met: time=15 min, SpO(2) <92%, tcpCO(2) >10.67 kPa, art. pH <7.1, K(+) >6.0 mmol/L. Primary outcome is the mean tcpCO(2) increase in kPa/min. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: After Cantonal Ethic Committee of Bern approval (ID 2018–00293, 22.03.2018), all study participants will provide written informed consent. Patients vulnerable towards hypoxia or hypercarbia are excluded. Study results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This study was registered on www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03478774, Pre-results) and the Swiss Trial Registry KOFAM (SNCTP000002861). BMJ Publishing Group 2019-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6629420/ /pubmed/31300494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025442 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Anaesthesia
Theiler, Lorenz
Schneeberg, Fabian
Riedel, Thomas
Kaiser, Heiko
Riva, Thomas
Greif, Robert
Apnoeic oxygenation with nasal cannula oxygen at different flow rates in anaesthetised patients: a study protocol for a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial
title Apnoeic oxygenation with nasal cannula oxygen at different flow rates in anaesthetised patients: a study protocol for a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial
title_full Apnoeic oxygenation with nasal cannula oxygen at different flow rates in anaesthetised patients: a study protocol for a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Apnoeic oxygenation with nasal cannula oxygen at different flow rates in anaesthetised patients: a study protocol for a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Apnoeic oxygenation with nasal cannula oxygen at different flow rates in anaesthetised patients: a study protocol for a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial
title_short Apnoeic oxygenation with nasal cannula oxygen at different flow rates in anaesthetised patients: a study protocol for a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial
title_sort apnoeic oxygenation with nasal cannula oxygen at different flow rates in anaesthetised patients: a study protocol for a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial
topic Anaesthesia
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6629420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31300494
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025442
work_keys_str_mv AT theilerlorenz apnoeicoxygenationwithnasalcannulaoxygenatdifferentflowratesinanaesthetisedpatientsastudyprotocolforanoninferiorityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT schneebergfabian apnoeicoxygenationwithnasalcannulaoxygenatdifferentflowratesinanaesthetisedpatientsastudyprotocolforanoninferiorityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT riedelthomas apnoeicoxygenationwithnasalcannulaoxygenatdifferentflowratesinanaesthetisedpatientsastudyprotocolforanoninferiorityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kaiserheiko apnoeicoxygenationwithnasalcannulaoxygenatdifferentflowratesinanaesthetisedpatientsastudyprotocolforanoninferiorityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT rivathomas apnoeicoxygenationwithnasalcannulaoxygenatdifferentflowratesinanaesthetisedpatientsastudyprotocolforanoninferiorityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT greifrobert apnoeicoxygenationwithnasalcannulaoxygenatdifferentflowratesinanaesthetisedpatientsastudyprotocolforanoninferiorityrandomisedcontrolledtrial