Cargando…

Salmonella Control Programme of Pig Feeds Is Financially Beneficial in Finland

To promote public health, Finland has adopted a stringent Salmonella control policy. However, the rationale of Salmonella control in pig feeds has been debated after a European Union (EU)-wide cost–benefit analysis, which provided mixed, country-specific results on whether control measures are econo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Niemi, Jarkko K., Heinola, Katriina, Simola, Maria, Tuominen, Pirkko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6629760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31338369
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00200
_version_ 1783435157063073792
author Niemi, Jarkko K.
Heinola, Katriina
Simola, Maria
Tuominen, Pirkko
author_facet Niemi, Jarkko K.
Heinola, Katriina
Simola, Maria
Tuominen, Pirkko
author_sort Niemi, Jarkko K.
collection PubMed
description To promote public health, Finland has adopted a stringent Salmonella control policy. However, the rationale of Salmonella control in pig feeds has been debated after a European Union (EU)-wide cost–benefit analysis, which provided mixed, country-specific results on whether control measures are economically beneficial. The aim of this study was to analyze the costs and benefits of current pig feed Salmonella control in Finland compared to a reduced control scenario. In addition, this study contributes to the literature by looking at the costs across stakeholder groups. The costs of preventive and monitoring measures were assessed, and a Monte Carlo model was developed to simulate costs caused by Salmonella contaminations along the pork supply chain (including feed importation, commercial feed manufacturing, feed transportation, mobile feed mixers, pig farms, slaughterhouses) and because of human salmonellosis originating from contaminated feed. The data were collected from official records and feed sector operators by surveys and interviews. The prevalence of Salmonella was obtained from a previously conducted risk assessment study. The total costs of pig feed Salmonella control were estimated on average to be €4.2–5.4 million per year (95% of simulated years between €2.1 and €9.1 million) for the current control scenario, and €33.8–34.8 million per year (95% €2.2 to €26.0 million) for the reduced control scenario. In the reduced control scenario, the monitoring and prevention costs were decreased down to €1.1–2.1 million, and the costs of Salmonella contaminations and human salmonellosis were up by €32.7 million when compared to the current control scenario. The results suggest that the current pig feed Salmonella control policy of Finland is economically profitable. It can reduce the costs caused by feed-related Salmonella contaminations on average by €29.4 million per year and provides public health benefits. Pig feed Salmonella control can support the effectiveness of the Finnish Salmonella Control Programme. The current pig feed Salmonella control policy benefits the consumers, while a substantial part of the costs are covered by feed operators. In order to increase the acceptability of current policy, greater attention to the allocation of financial responsibilities regarding the control measures may be required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6629760
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66297602019-07-23 Salmonella Control Programme of Pig Feeds Is Financially Beneficial in Finland Niemi, Jarkko K. Heinola, Katriina Simola, Maria Tuominen, Pirkko Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science To promote public health, Finland has adopted a stringent Salmonella control policy. However, the rationale of Salmonella control in pig feeds has been debated after a European Union (EU)-wide cost–benefit analysis, which provided mixed, country-specific results on whether control measures are economically beneficial. The aim of this study was to analyze the costs and benefits of current pig feed Salmonella control in Finland compared to a reduced control scenario. In addition, this study contributes to the literature by looking at the costs across stakeholder groups. The costs of preventive and monitoring measures were assessed, and a Monte Carlo model was developed to simulate costs caused by Salmonella contaminations along the pork supply chain (including feed importation, commercial feed manufacturing, feed transportation, mobile feed mixers, pig farms, slaughterhouses) and because of human salmonellosis originating from contaminated feed. The data were collected from official records and feed sector operators by surveys and interviews. The prevalence of Salmonella was obtained from a previously conducted risk assessment study. The total costs of pig feed Salmonella control were estimated on average to be €4.2–5.4 million per year (95% of simulated years between €2.1 and €9.1 million) for the current control scenario, and €33.8–34.8 million per year (95% €2.2 to €26.0 million) for the reduced control scenario. In the reduced control scenario, the monitoring and prevention costs were decreased down to €1.1–2.1 million, and the costs of Salmonella contaminations and human salmonellosis were up by €32.7 million when compared to the current control scenario. The results suggest that the current pig feed Salmonella control policy of Finland is economically profitable. It can reduce the costs caused by feed-related Salmonella contaminations on average by €29.4 million per year and provides public health benefits. Pig feed Salmonella control can support the effectiveness of the Finnish Salmonella Control Programme. The current pig feed Salmonella control policy benefits the consumers, while a substantial part of the costs are covered by feed operators. In order to increase the acceptability of current policy, greater attention to the allocation of financial responsibilities regarding the control measures may be required. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6629760/ /pubmed/31338369 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00200 Text en Copyright © 2019 Niemi, Heinola, Simola and Tuominen. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
Niemi, Jarkko K.
Heinola, Katriina
Simola, Maria
Tuominen, Pirkko
Salmonella Control Programme of Pig Feeds Is Financially Beneficial in Finland
title Salmonella Control Programme of Pig Feeds Is Financially Beneficial in Finland
title_full Salmonella Control Programme of Pig Feeds Is Financially Beneficial in Finland
title_fullStr Salmonella Control Programme of Pig Feeds Is Financially Beneficial in Finland
title_full_unstemmed Salmonella Control Programme of Pig Feeds Is Financially Beneficial in Finland
title_short Salmonella Control Programme of Pig Feeds Is Financially Beneficial in Finland
title_sort salmonella control programme of pig feeds is financially beneficial in finland
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6629760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31338369
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00200
work_keys_str_mv AT niemijarkkok salmonellacontrolprogrammeofpigfeedsisfinanciallybeneficialinfinland
AT heinolakatriina salmonellacontrolprogrammeofpigfeedsisfinanciallybeneficialinfinland
AT simolamaria salmonellacontrolprogrammeofpigfeedsisfinanciallybeneficialinfinland
AT tuominenpirkko salmonellacontrolprogrammeofpigfeedsisfinanciallybeneficialinfinland