Cargando…

High-Tech and Tactile: Cognitive Enrichment for Zoo-Housed Gorillas

The field of environmental enrichment for zoo animals, particularly great apes, has been revived by technological advancements such as touchscreen interfaces and motion sensors. However, direct animal-computer interaction (ACI) is impractical or undesirable for many zoos. We developed a modular cubo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clark, Fay E., Gray, Stuart I., Bennett, Peter, Mason, Lucy J., Burgess, Katy V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6629937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31354581
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01574
_version_ 1783435191047421952
author Clark, Fay E.
Gray, Stuart I.
Bennett, Peter
Mason, Lucy J.
Burgess, Katy V.
author_facet Clark, Fay E.
Gray, Stuart I.
Bennett, Peter
Mason, Lucy J.
Burgess, Katy V.
author_sort Clark, Fay E.
collection PubMed
description The field of environmental enrichment for zoo animals, particularly great apes, has been revived by technological advancements such as touchscreen interfaces and motion sensors. However, direct animal-computer interaction (ACI) is impractical or undesirable for many zoos. We developed a modular cuboid puzzle maze for the troop of six Western lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) at Bristol Zoo Gardens, United Kingdom. The gorillas could use their fingers or tools to interact with interconnected modules and remove food rewards. Twelve modules could be interchanged within the frame to create novel iterations with every trial. We took a screen-free approach to enrichment: substituting ACI for tactile, physically complex device components, in addition to hidden automatic sensors, and cameras to log device use. The current study evaluated the gorillas’ behavioral responses to the device, and evaluated it as a form of “cognitive enrichment.” Five out of six gorillas used the device, during monthly trials of 1 h duration, over a 6 month period. All users were female including two infants, and there were significant individual differences in duration of device use. The successful extraction of food rewards was only performed by the three tool-using gorillas. Device use did not diminish over time, and gorillas took turns to use the device alone or as one mother-infant dyad. Our results suggest that the device was a form of cognitive enrichment for the study troop because it allowed gorillas to solve novel challenges, and device use was not associated with behavioral indicators of stress or frustration. However, device exposure had no significant effects on gorilla activity budgets. The device has the potential to be a sustainable enrichment method in the long-term, tailored to individual gorilla skill levels and motivations. Our study represents a technological advancement for gorilla enrichment, an area which had been particularly overlooked until now. We wholly encourage the continued development of this physical maze system for other great apes under human care, with or without computer logging technology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6629937
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66299372019-07-26 High-Tech and Tactile: Cognitive Enrichment for Zoo-Housed Gorillas Clark, Fay E. Gray, Stuart I. Bennett, Peter Mason, Lucy J. Burgess, Katy V. Front Psychol Psychology The field of environmental enrichment for zoo animals, particularly great apes, has been revived by technological advancements such as touchscreen interfaces and motion sensors. However, direct animal-computer interaction (ACI) is impractical or undesirable for many zoos. We developed a modular cuboid puzzle maze for the troop of six Western lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) at Bristol Zoo Gardens, United Kingdom. The gorillas could use their fingers or tools to interact with interconnected modules and remove food rewards. Twelve modules could be interchanged within the frame to create novel iterations with every trial. We took a screen-free approach to enrichment: substituting ACI for tactile, physically complex device components, in addition to hidden automatic sensors, and cameras to log device use. The current study evaluated the gorillas’ behavioral responses to the device, and evaluated it as a form of “cognitive enrichment.” Five out of six gorillas used the device, during monthly trials of 1 h duration, over a 6 month period. All users were female including two infants, and there were significant individual differences in duration of device use. The successful extraction of food rewards was only performed by the three tool-using gorillas. Device use did not diminish over time, and gorillas took turns to use the device alone or as one mother-infant dyad. Our results suggest that the device was a form of cognitive enrichment for the study troop because it allowed gorillas to solve novel challenges, and device use was not associated with behavioral indicators of stress or frustration. However, device exposure had no significant effects on gorilla activity budgets. The device has the potential to be a sustainable enrichment method in the long-term, tailored to individual gorilla skill levels and motivations. Our study represents a technological advancement for gorilla enrichment, an area which had been particularly overlooked until now. We wholly encourage the continued development of this physical maze system for other great apes under human care, with or without computer logging technology. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6629937/ /pubmed/31354581 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01574 Text en Copyright © 2019 Clark, Gray, Bennett, Mason and Burgess. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Clark, Fay E.
Gray, Stuart I.
Bennett, Peter
Mason, Lucy J.
Burgess, Katy V.
High-Tech and Tactile: Cognitive Enrichment for Zoo-Housed Gorillas
title High-Tech and Tactile: Cognitive Enrichment for Zoo-Housed Gorillas
title_full High-Tech and Tactile: Cognitive Enrichment for Zoo-Housed Gorillas
title_fullStr High-Tech and Tactile: Cognitive Enrichment for Zoo-Housed Gorillas
title_full_unstemmed High-Tech and Tactile: Cognitive Enrichment for Zoo-Housed Gorillas
title_short High-Tech and Tactile: Cognitive Enrichment for Zoo-Housed Gorillas
title_sort high-tech and tactile: cognitive enrichment for zoo-housed gorillas
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6629937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31354581
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01574
work_keys_str_mv AT clarkfaye hightechandtactilecognitiveenrichmentforzoohousedgorillas
AT graystuarti hightechandtactilecognitiveenrichmentforzoohousedgorillas
AT bennettpeter hightechandtactilecognitiveenrichmentforzoohousedgorillas
AT masonlucyj hightechandtactilecognitiveenrichmentforzoohousedgorillas
AT burgesskatyv hightechandtactilecognitiveenrichmentforzoohousedgorillas