Cargando…

Differentiations in Gene Content and Expression Response to Virulence Induction Between Two Agrobacterium Strains

Agrobacterium tumefaciens is important in biotechnology due to its ability to transform eukaryotic cells. Although the molecular mechanisms have been studied extensively, previous studies were focused on the model strain C58. Consequently, nearly all of the commonly used strains for biotechnology ap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haryono, Mindia, Cho, Shu-Ting, Fang, Mei-Jane, Chen, Ai-Ping, Chou, Shu-Jen, Lai, Erh-Min, Kuo, Chih-Horng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6629968/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31354658
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01554
_version_ 1783435198578294784
author Haryono, Mindia
Cho, Shu-Ting
Fang, Mei-Jane
Chen, Ai-Ping
Chou, Shu-Jen
Lai, Erh-Min
Kuo, Chih-Horng
author_facet Haryono, Mindia
Cho, Shu-Ting
Fang, Mei-Jane
Chen, Ai-Ping
Chou, Shu-Jen
Lai, Erh-Min
Kuo, Chih-Horng
author_sort Haryono, Mindia
collection PubMed
description Agrobacterium tumefaciens is important in biotechnology due to its ability to transform eukaryotic cells. Although the molecular mechanisms have been studied extensively, previous studies were focused on the model strain C58. Consequently, nearly all of the commonly used strains for biotechnology application were derived from C58 and share similar host ranges. To overcome this limitation, better understanding of the natural genetic variation could provide valuable insights. In this study, we conducted comparative analysis between C58 and 1D1609. These two strains belong to different genomospecies within the species complex and have distinct infectivity profiles. Genome comparisons revealed that each strain has >1,000 unique genes in addition to the 4,115 shared genes. Furthermore, the divergence in gene content and sequences vary among replicons. The circular chromosome is much more conserved compared to the linear chromosome. To identify the genes that may contribute to their differentiation in virulence, we compared the transcriptomes to screen for genes differentially expressed in response to the inducer acetosyringone. Based on the RNA-Seq results with three biological replicates, ∼100 differentially expressed genes were identified in each strain. Intriguingly, homologous genes with the same expression pattern account for <50% of these differentially expressed genes. This finding indicated that phenotypic variation may be partially explained by divergence in expression regulation. In summary, this study characterized the genomic and transcriptomic differences between two representative Agrobacterium strains. Moreover, the short list of differentially expressed genes are promising candidates for future characterization, which could improve our understanding of the genetic mechanisms for phenotypic divergence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6629968
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66299682019-07-26 Differentiations in Gene Content and Expression Response to Virulence Induction Between Two Agrobacterium Strains Haryono, Mindia Cho, Shu-Ting Fang, Mei-Jane Chen, Ai-Ping Chou, Shu-Jen Lai, Erh-Min Kuo, Chih-Horng Front Microbiol Microbiology Agrobacterium tumefaciens is important in biotechnology due to its ability to transform eukaryotic cells. Although the molecular mechanisms have been studied extensively, previous studies were focused on the model strain C58. Consequently, nearly all of the commonly used strains for biotechnology application were derived from C58 and share similar host ranges. To overcome this limitation, better understanding of the natural genetic variation could provide valuable insights. In this study, we conducted comparative analysis between C58 and 1D1609. These two strains belong to different genomospecies within the species complex and have distinct infectivity profiles. Genome comparisons revealed that each strain has >1,000 unique genes in addition to the 4,115 shared genes. Furthermore, the divergence in gene content and sequences vary among replicons. The circular chromosome is much more conserved compared to the linear chromosome. To identify the genes that may contribute to their differentiation in virulence, we compared the transcriptomes to screen for genes differentially expressed in response to the inducer acetosyringone. Based on the RNA-Seq results with three biological replicates, ∼100 differentially expressed genes were identified in each strain. Intriguingly, homologous genes with the same expression pattern account for <50% of these differentially expressed genes. This finding indicated that phenotypic variation may be partially explained by divergence in expression regulation. In summary, this study characterized the genomic and transcriptomic differences between two representative Agrobacterium strains. Moreover, the short list of differentially expressed genes are promising candidates for future characterization, which could improve our understanding of the genetic mechanisms for phenotypic divergence. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6629968/ /pubmed/31354658 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01554 Text en Copyright © 2019 Haryono, Cho, Fang, Chen, Chou, Lai and Kuo. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Haryono, Mindia
Cho, Shu-Ting
Fang, Mei-Jane
Chen, Ai-Ping
Chou, Shu-Jen
Lai, Erh-Min
Kuo, Chih-Horng
Differentiations in Gene Content and Expression Response to Virulence Induction Between Two Agrobacterium Strains
title Differentiations in Gene Content and Expression Response to Virulence Induction Between Two Agrobacterium Strains
title_full Differentiations in Gene Content and Expression Response to Virulence Induction Between Two Agrobacterium Strains
title_fullStr Differentiations in Gene Content and Expression Response to Virulence Induction Between Two Agrobacterium Strains
title_full_unstemmed Differentiations in Gene Content and Expression Response to Virulence Induction Between Two Agrobacterium Strains
title_short Differentiations in Gene Content and Expression Response to Virulence Induction Between Two Agrobacterium Strains
title_sort differentiations in gene content and expression response to virulence induction between two agrobacterium strains
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6629968/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31354658
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01554
work_keys_str_mv AT haryonomindia differentiationsingenecontentandexpressionresponsetovirulenceinductionbetweentwoagrobacteriumstrains
AT choshuting differentiationsingenecontentandexpressionresponsetovirulenceinductionbetweentwoagrobacteriumstrains
AT fangmeijane differentiationsingenecontentandexpressionresponsetovirulenceinductionbetweentwoagrobacteriumstrains
AT chenaiping differentiationsingenecontentandexpressionresponsetovirulenceinductionbetweentwoagrobacteriumstrains
AT choushujen differentiationsingenecontentandexpressionresponsetovirulenceinductionbetweentwoagrobacteriumstrains
AT laierhmin differentiationsingenecontentandexpressionresponsetovirulenceinductionbetweentwoagrobacteriumstrains
AT kuochihhorng differentiationsingenecontentandexpressionresponsetovirulenceinductionbetweentwoagrobacteriumstrains