Cargando…

New Evaluation Procedure for Multi-Dimensional Mechanical Strains and Tangent Moduli of Breast Implants: IDEAL IMPLANT(®) Structured Breast Implant Compared to Silicone Gel Implants

The IDEAL IMPLANT(®) Structured Breast Implant is a dual lumen saline-filled implant with capsular contracture and deflation/rupture rates much lower than single-lumen silicone gel-filled implants. To better understand the implant’s mechanical properties and to provide a potential explanation for th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brandon, Harold J., Nichter, Larry S., Back, Dwight D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6630318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31083604
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering6020043
_version_ 1783435274136584192
author Brandon, Harold J.
Nichter, Larry S.
Back, Dwight D.
author_facet Brandon, Harold J.
Nichter, Larry S.
Back, Dwight D.
author_sort Brandon, Harold J.
collection PubMed
description The IDEAL IMPLANT(®) Structured Breast Implant is a dual lumen saline-filled implant with capsular contracture and deflation/rupture rates much lower than single-lumen silicone gel-filled implants. To better understand the implant’s mechanical properties and to provide a potential explanation for these eight-year clinical results, a novel approach to compressive load testing was employed. Multi-dimensional strains and tangent moduli, metrics describing the shape stability of the total implant, were derived from the experimental load and platen spacing data. The IDEAL IMPLANT was found to have projection, diametric, and areal strains that were generally less than silicone gel implants, and tangent moduli that were generally greater than silicone gel implants. Despite having a relatively inviscid saline fill, the IDEAL IMPLANT was found to be more shape stable compared to gel implants, which implies potentially less interaction with the capsule wall when the implant is subjected to compressive loads. Under compressive loads, the shape stability of a higher cross-link density, cohesive gel implant was unexpectedly found to be similar to or the same as a gel implant. In localized diametric compression testing, the IDEAL IMPLANT was found to have a palpability similar to a gel implant, but softer than a cohesive gel implant.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6630318
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66303182019-08-19 New Evaluation Procedure for Multi-Dimensional Mechanical Strains and Tangent Moduli of Breast Implants: IDEAL IMPLANT(®) Structured Breast Implant Compared to Silicone Gel Implants Brandon, Harold J. Nichter, Larry S. Back, Dwight D. Bioengineering (Basel) Article The IDEAL IMPLANT(®) Structured Breast Implant is a dual lumen saline-filled implant with capsular contracture and deflation/rupture rates much lower than single-lumen silicone gel-filled implants. To better understand the implant’s mechanical properties and to provide a potential explanation for these eight-year clinical results, a novel approach to compressive load testing was employed. Multi-dimensional strains and tangent moduli, metrics describing the shape stability of the total implant, were derived from the experimental load and platen spacing data. The IDEAL IMPLANT was found to have projection, diametric, and areal strains that were generally less than silicone gel implants, and tangent moduli that were generally greater than silicone gel implants. Despite having a relatively inviscid saline fill, the IDEAL IMPLANT was found to be more shape stable compared to gel implants, which implies potentially less interaction with the capsule wall when the implant is subjected to compressive loads. Under compressive loads, the shape stability of a higher cross-link density, cohesive gel implant was unexpectedly found to be similar to or the same as a gel implant. In localized diametric compression testing, the IDEAL IMPLANT was found to have a palpability similar to a gel implant, but softer than a cohesive gel implant. MDPI 2019-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6630318/ /pubmed/31083604 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering6020043 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Brandon, Harold J.
Nichter, Larry S.
Back, Dwight D.
New Evaluation Procedure for Multi-Dimensional Mechanical Strains and Tangent Moduli of Breast Implants: IDEAL IMPLANT(®) Structured Breast Implant Compared to Silicone Gel Implants
title New Evaluation Procedure for Multi-Dimensional Mechanical Strains and Tangent Moduli of Breast Implants: IDEAL IMPLANT(®) Structured Breast Implant Compared to Silicone Gel Implants
title_full New Evaluation Procedure for Multi-Dimensional Mechanical Strains and Tangent Moduli of Breast Implants: IDEAL IMPLANT(®) Structured Breast Implant Compared to Silicone Gel Implants
title_fullStr New Evaluation Procedure for Multi-Dimensional Mechanical Strains and Tangent Moduli of Breast Implants: IDEAL IMPLANT(®) Structured Breast Implant Compared to Silicone Gel Implants
title_full_unstemmed New Evaluation Procedure for Multi-Dimensional Mechanical Strains and Tangent Moduli of Breast Implants: IDEAL IMPLANT(®) Structured Breast Implant Compared to Silicone Gel Implants
title_short New Evaluation Procedure for Multi-Dimensional Mechanical Strains and Tangent Moduli of Breast Implants: IDEAL IMPLANT(®) Structured Breast Implant Compared to Silicone Gel Implants
title_sort new evaluation procedure for multi-dimensional mechanical strains and tangent moduli of breast implants: ideal implant(®) structured breast implant compared to silicone gel implants
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6630318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31083604
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering6020043
work_keys_str_mv AT brandonharoldj newevaluationprocedureformultidimensionalmechanicalstrainsandtangentmoduliofbreastimplantsidealimplantstructuredbreastimplantcomparedtosiliconegelimplants
AT nichterlarrys newevaluationprocedureformultidimensionalmechanicalstrainsandtangentmoduliofbreastimplantsidealimplantstructuredbreastimplantcomparedtosiliconegelimplants
AT backdwightd newevaluationprocedureformultidimensionalmechanicalstrainsandtangentmoduliofbreastimplantsidealimplantstructuredbreastimplantcomparedtosiliconegelimplants