Cargando…
Is negative-pressure wound therapy beneficial in modern-day breast surgery?
Negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is used to treat many different types of wounds, but there is still a lack of large studies describing its effectiveness in breast surgery. Enhanced recovery, reduction of complications, and good scar quality might be improved by the application of NPWT. Existi...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Termedia Publishing House
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6630394/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31316287 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wo.2019.85199 |
_version_ | 1783435292285337600 |
---|---|
author | Matusiak, Damian Wichtowski, Mateusz Pieszko, Karolina Kobylarek, Dominik Murawa, Dawid |
author_facet | Matusiak, Damian Wichtowski, Mateusz Pieszko, Karolina Kobylarek, Dominik Murawa, Dawid |
author_sort | Matusiak, Damian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is used to treat many different types of wounds, but there is still a lack of large studies describing its effectiveness in breast surgery. Enhanced recovery, reduction of complications, and good scar quality might be improved by the application of NPWT. Existing data show that vacuumassisted closure (VAC) application after expander-based breast reconstruction may be beneficial because of decreasing overall complications in comparison with standard wound treatment. There are few cases in which the use of negative pressure resulted in healing of complicated breast wounds after implant insertion – most breasts achieved healing, wherein duration of NPWT ranged from seven to 21 days. The use of NPWT leads to a decrease of seroma formation (from 70% to 15%), the mean percutaneous aspirated volume (from 193 ml to 26 ml) and the numbers of percutaneous aspirations (from three to one) in latissimus dorsi flap reconstruction. Furthermore, a prospective, within-patient, randomised study with 200 participants showed that treating closed incisional wounds after reduction mammoplasty with a VAC system resulted in a decrease of overall complications and protected against wound dehiscence. In the literature, there are cases showing that NPWT may be useful for the successful treatment of chronic and non-healing wounds, included non-puerperal mastitis and surgical sites affected by radiation therapy due to breast cancer. There is still a need for evidence confirming the effectiveness of NPWT in breast surgery because of the deficiency of large prospective studies that compare NPWT with standard treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6630394 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Termedia Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66303942019-07-17 Is negative-pressure wound therapy beneficial in modern-day breast surgery? Matusiak, Damian Wichtowski, Mateusz Pieszko, Karolina Kobylarek, Dominik Murawa, Dawid Contemp Oncol (Pozn) Review Paper Negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is used to treat many different types of wounds, but there is still a lack of large studies describing its effectiveness in breast surgery. Enhanced recovery, reduction of complications, and good scar quality might be improved by the application of NPWT. Existing data show that vacuumassisted closure (VAC) application after expander-based breast reconstruction may be beneficial because of decreasing overall complications in comparison with standard wound treatment. There are few cases in which the use of negative pressure resulted in healing of complicated breast wounds after implant insertion – most breasts achieved healing, wherein duration of NPWT ranged from seven to 21 days. The use of NPWT leads to a decrease of seroma formation (from 70% to 15%), the mean percutaneous aspirated volume (from 193 ml to 26 ml) and the numbers of percutaneous aspirations (from three to one) in latissimus dorsi flap reconstruction. Furthermore, a prospective, within-patient, randomised study with 200 participants showed that treating closed incisional wounds after reduction mammoplasty with a VAC system resulted in a decrease of overall complications and protected against wound dehiscence. In the literature, there are cases showing that NPWT may be useful for the successful treatment of chronic and non-healing wounds, included non-puerperal mastitis and surgical sites affected by radiation therapy due to breast cancer. There is still a need for evidence confirming the effectiveness of NPWT in breast surgery because of the deficiency of large prospective studies that compare NPWT with standard treatment. Termedia Publishing House 2019-05-27 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6630394/ /pubmed/31316287 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wo.2019.85199 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Termedia Sp. z o. o. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license. |
spellingShingle | Review Paper Matusiak, Damian Wichtowski, Mateusz Pieszko, Karolina Kobylarek, Dominik Murawa, Dawid Is negative-pressure wound therapy beneficial in modern-day breast surgery? |
title | Is negative-pressure wound therapy beneficial in modern-day breast surgery? |
title_full | Is negative-pressure wound therapy beneficial in modern-day breast surgery? |
title_fullStr | Is negative-pressure wound therapy beneficial in modern-day breast surgery? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is negative-pressure wound therapy beneficial in modern-day breast surgery? |
title_short | Is negative-pressure wound therapy beneficial in modern-day breast surgery? |
title_sort | is negative-pressure wound therapy beneficial in modern-day breast surgery? |
topic | Review Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6630394/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31316287 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wo.2019.85199 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT matusiakdamian isnegativepressurewoundtherapybeneficialinmoderndaybreastsurgery AT wichtowskimateusz isnegativepressurewoundtherapybeneficialinmoderndaybreastsurgery AT pieszkokarolina isnegativepressurewoundtherapybeneficialinmoderndaybreastsurgery AT kobylarekdominik isnegativepressurewoundtherapybeneficialinmoderndaybreastsurgery AT murawadawid isnegativepressurewoundtherapybeneficialinmoderndaybreastsurgery |