Cargando…
Science is not a Social Opinion
Recently, the main American associations in the dental field reported concerns regarding a film on the Netflix, Amazon, Apple, and Vimeo platforms that reported that endodontic treatments of root canals are linked to serious systemic pathologies, against any scientific evidence. This extreme case hi...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6630592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30939736 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj7020034 |
_version_ | 1783435338495033344 |
---|---|
author | Tatullo, Marco |
author_facet | Tatullo, Marco |
author_sort | Tatullo, Marco |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recently, the main American associations in the dental field reported concerns regarding a film on the Netflix, Amazon, Apple, and Vimeo platforms that reported that endodontic treatments of root canals are linked to serious systemic pathologies, against any scientific evidence. This extreme case highlights how information, in a social networking era, is dramatically conditioned by a small number of users, leading to large scale consequences in political opinions, alimentary choices, or even in healthcare policy. It is urgent to demonstrate a strong awareness by the academic, institutional, and associative bodies in order to restore the correct flow of information on mass media and social networks. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6630592 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66305922019-08-19 Science is not a Social Opinion Tatullo, Marco Dent J (Basel) Editorial Recently, the main American associations in the dental field reported concerns regarding a film on the Netflix, Amazon, Apple, and Vimeo platforms that reported that endodontic treatments of root canals are linked to serious systemic pathologies, against any scientific evidence. This extreme case highlights how information, in a social networking era, is dramatically conditioned by a small number of users, leading to large scale consequences in political opinions, alimentary choices, or even in healthcare policy. It is urgent to demonstrate a strong awareness by the academic, institutional, and associative bodies in order to restore the correct flow of information on mass media and social networks. MDPI 2019-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6630592/ /pubmed/30939736 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj7020034 Text en © 2019 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Editorial Tatullo, Marco Science is not a Social Opinion |
title | Science is not a Social Opinion |
title_full | Science is not a Social Opinion |
title_fullStr | Science is not a Social Opinion |
title_full_unstemmed | Science is not a Social Opinion |
title_short | Science is not a Social Opinion |
title_sort | science is not a social opinion |
topic | Editorial |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6630592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30939736 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj7020034 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tatullomarco scienceisnotasocialopinion |