Cargando…

Science is not a Social Opinion

Recently, the main American associations in the dental field reported concerns regarding a film on the Netflix, Amazon, Apple, and Vimeo platforms that reported that endodontic treatments of root canals are linked to serious systemic pathologies, against any scientific evidence. This extreme case hi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Tatullo, Marco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6630592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30939736
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj7020034
_version_ 1783435338495033344
author Tatullo, Marco
author_facet Tatullo, Marco
author_sort Tatullo, Marco
collection PubMed
description Recently, the main American associations in the dental field reported concerns regarding a film on the Netflix, Amazon, Apple, and Vimeo platforms that reported that endodontic treatments of root canals are linked to serious systemic pathologies, against any scientific evidence. This extreme case highlights how information, in a social networking era, is dramatically conditioned by a small number of users, leading to large scale consequences in political opinions, alimentary choices, or even in healthcare policy. It is urgent to demonstrate a strong awareness by the academic, institutional, and associative bodies in order to restore the correct flow of information on mass media and social networks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6630592
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66305922019-08-19 Science is not a Social Opinion Tatullo, Marco Dent J (Basel) Editorial Recently, the main American associations in the dental field reported concerns regarding a film on the Netflix, Amazon, Apple, and Vimeo platforms that reported that endodontic treatments of root canals are linked to serious systemic pathologies, against any scientific evidence. This extreme case highlights how information, in a social networking era, is dramatically conditioned by a small number of users, leading to large scale consequences in political opinions, alimentary choices, or even in healthcare policy. It is urgent to demonstrate a strong awareness by the academic, institutional, and associative bodies in order to restore the correct flow of information on mass media and social networks. MDPI 2019-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6630592/ /pubmed/30939736 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj7020034 Text en © 2019 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Editorial
Tatullo, Marco
Science is not a Social Opinion
title Science is not a Social Opinion
title_full Science is not a Social Opinion
title_fullStr Science is not a Social Opinion
title_full_unstemmed Science is not a Social Opinion
title_short Science is not a Social Opinion
title_sort science is not a social opinion
topic Editorial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6630592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30939736
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj7020034
work_keys_str_mv AT tatullomarco scienceisnotasocialopinion