Cargando…

Performance Evaluation of Styrene-Butadiene-Styrene-Modified Stone Mastic Asphalt with Basalt Fiber Using Different Compaction Methods

Superpave gyratory compaction (SGC) and Marshall compaction methods are essentially designed according to volumetric properties. In spite of the similarity, the optimum asphalt contents (OAC) of the two methods are greatly affected by the laboratory compaction process, which would further influence...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Wensheng, Cheng, Yongchun, Zhou, Peilei, Tan, Guojin, Wang, Haitao, Liu, Hanbing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6630710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31174316
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym11061006
_version_ 1783435366567510016
author Wang, Wensheng
Cheng, Yongchun
Zhou, Peilei
Tan, Guojin
Wang, Haitao
Liu, Hanbing
author_facet Wang, Wensheng
Cheng, Yongchun
Zhou, Peilei
Tan, Guojin
Wang, Haitao
Liu, Hanbing
author_sort Wang, Wensheng
collection PubMed
description Superpave gyratory compaction (SGC) and Marshall compaction methods are essentially designed according to volumetric properties. In spite of the similarity, the optimum asphalt contents (OAC) of the two methods are greatly affected by the laboratory compaction process, which would further influence their performance. This study aims to evaluate the performance of styrene-butadiene-styrene (SBS)-modified stone mastic asphalt (SMA) with basalt fiber by using SGC and Marshall compaction methods. Basalt fiber was proved to improve and strength the basic properties of SBS-asphalt according to test results of asphalt binder. The effects of SGC and Marshall compaction methods on OAC and volumetric properties, i.e., density, air voids (VA), voids in mineral aggregates (VMA), and voids filled with asphalt (VFA), were evaluated in detail. Finally, the pavement performance of asphalt mixture prepared by SGC and Marshall compaction methods were compared in order to analyze the high-temperature creep, low-temperature splitting, and moisture stability performance. Results showed that the OAC of SGC (~5.70%) was slightly lower than that of Marshall method (5.80%). Furthermore, the pavement performance of SGC specimens were improved to a certain extent compared with Marshall specimens, indicating that SGC has a better compaction effect and mechanical performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6630710
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66307102019-08-19 Performance Evaluation of Styrene-Butadiene-Styrene-Modified Stone Mastic Asphalt with Basalt Fiber Using Different Compaction Methods Wang, Wensheng Cheng, Yongchun Zhou, Peilei Tan, Guojin Wang, Haitao Liu, Hanbing Polymers (Basel) Article Superpave gyratory compaction (SGC) and Marshall compaction methods are essentially designed according to volumetric properties. In spite of the similarity, the optimum asphalt contents (OAC) of the two methods are greatly affected by the laboratory compaction process, which would further influence their performance. This study aims to evaluate the performance of styrene-butadiene-styrene (SBS)-modified stone mastic asphalt (SMA) with basalt fiber by using SGC and Marshall compaction methods. Basalt fiber was proved to improve and strength the basic properties of SBS-asphalt according to test results of asphalt binder. The effects of SGC and Marshall compaction methods on OAC and volumetric properties, i.e., density, air voids (VA), voids in mineral aggregates (VMA), and voids filled with asphalt (VFA), were evaluated in detail. Finally, the pavement performance of asphalt mixture prepared by SGC and Marshall compaction methods were compared in order to analyze the high-temperature creep, low-temperature splitting, and moisture stability performance. Results showed that the OAC of SGC (~5.70%) was slightly lower than that of Marshall method (5.80%). Furthermore, the pavement performance of SGC specimens were improved to a certain extent compared with Marshall specimens, indicating that SGC has a better compaction effect and mechanical performance. MDPI 2019-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6630710/ /pubmed/31174316 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym11061006 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wang, Wensheng
Cheng, Yongchun
Zhou, Peilei
Tan, Guojin
Wang, Haitao
Liu, Hanbing
Performance Evaluation of Styrene-Butadiene-Styrene-Modified Stone Mastic Asphalt with Basalt Fiber Using Different Compaction Methods
title Performance Evaluation of Styrene-Butadiene-Styrene-Modified Stone Mastic Asphalt with Basalt Fiber Using Different Compaction Methods
title_full Performance Evaluation of Styrene-Butadiene-Styrene-Modified Stone Mastic Asphalt with Basalt Fiber Using Different Compaction Methods
title_fullStr Performance Evaluation of Styrene-Butadiene-Styrene-Modified Stone Mastic Asphalt with Basalt Fiber Using Different Compaction Methods
title_full_unstemmed Performance Evaluation of Styrene-Butadiene-Styrene-Modified Stone Mastic Asphalt with Basalt Fiber Using Different Compaction Methods
title_short Performance Evaluation of Styrene-Butadiene-Styrene-Modified Stone Mastic Asphalt with Basalt Fiber Using Different Compaction Methods
title_sort performance evaluation of styrene-butadiene-styrene-modified stone mastic asphalt with basalt fiber using different compaction methods
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6630710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31174316
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym11061006
work_keys_str_mv AT wangwensheng performanceevaluationofstyrenebutadienestyrenemodifiedstonemasticasphaltwithbasaltfiberusingdifferentcompactionmethods
AT chengyongchun performanceevaluationofstyrenebutadienestyrenemodifiedstonemasticasphaltwithbasaltfiberusingdifferentcompactionmethods
AT zhoupeilei performanceevaluationofstyrenebutadienestyrenemodifiedstonemasticasphaltwithbasaltfiberusingdifferentcompactionmethods
AT tanguojin performanceevaluationofstyrenebutadienestyrenemodifiedstonemasticasphaltwithbasaltfiberusingdifferentcompactionmethods
AT wanghaitao performanceevaluationofstyrenebutadienestyrenemodifiedstonemasticasphaltwithbasaltfiberusingdifferentcompactionmethods
AT liuhanbing performanceevaluationofstyrenebutadienestyrenemodifiedstonemasticasphaltwithbasaltfiberusingdifferentcompactionmethods