Cargando…

Improving Efficiency in Dental School Clinics by Computerizing a Manual Task

Background: We computerized a formerly manual task of requesting dental faculty to conduct quality checks on student providers during patient encounters. We surveyed student providers who experienced the manual and computerized versions of the faculty request process for one year each. Methods: All...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Virun, Vladyslav, Singhe Dhaliwal, Gurmukh, Liu, Chieh-Han (Jeffrey), Sharma, Pranshu, Kaur, Harleen, Nalliah, Romesh P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6631225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31052353
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj7020044
_version_ 1783435473982586880
author Virun, Vladyslav
Singhe Dhaliwal, Gurmukh
Liu, Chieh-Han (Jeffrey)
Sharma, Pranshu
Kaur, Harleen
Nalliah, Romesh P.
author_facet Virun, Vladyslav
Singhe Dhaliwal, Gurmukh
Liu, Chieh-Han (Jeffrey)
Sharma, Pranshu
Kaur, Harleen
Nalliah, Romesh P.
author_sort Virun, Vladyslav
collection PubMed
description Background: We computerized a formerly manual task of requesting dental faculty to conduct quality checks on student providers during patient encounters. We surveyed student providers who experienced the manual and computerized versions of the faculty request process for one year each. Methods: All surveys were emailed to student providers and there were no reminders or incentives to complete the survey. Simple descriptive data were used to present the results of the study and Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval was provided by the University of Michigan Medical School Committee on Human Research (HUM00131029) on 1 June 2018 Results: The response rate for the survey was 47.1%. A total of 16.1% of student providers reported that the Faculty Request System (FRS) helped them save 1–10 min per clinic session, 22.3% said it saved them 11–20 min, 29.5% said it saved them 21–30 min, 21.4% said it saved 31–40 min, 2.67% said it saved 41–50 min, and 7.14% said it saved more than 50 min per clinic session. Regarding how student providers used the additional time they gained from the FRS, 96.4% said they used some of the time to write up their notes, 88.4% said they used some of the time to discuss treatments with their patients, 83.9% said they engaged in general conversation with their patients, 81.3% said they took care of other patient-related duties, while 1.8% said they had less time available after the implementation of the FRS. Conclusions: The FRS enabled student providers to remain with their patients for almost a full 30 min more (during a 3 h session). This paper describes several benefits experienced by student providers, and the resulting impacts on patient experiences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6631225
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66312252019-08-19 Improving Efficiency in Dental School Clinics by Computerizing a Manual Task Virun, Vladyslav Singhe Dhaliwal, Gurmukh Liu, Chieh-Han (Jeffrey) Sharma, Pranshu Kaur, Harleen Nalliah, Romesh P. Dent J (Basel) Article Background: We computerized a formerly manual task of requesting dental faculty to conduct quality checks on student providers during patient encounters. We surveyed student providers who experienced the manual and computerized versions of the faculty request process for one year each. Methods: All surveys were emailed to student providers and there were no reminders or incentives to complete the survey. Simple descriptive data were used to present the results of the study and Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval was provided by the University of Michigan Medical School Committee on Human Research (HUM00131029) on 1 June 2018 Results: The response rate for the survey was 47.1%. A total of 16.1% of student providers reported that the Faculty Request System (FRS) helped them save 1–10 min per clinic session, 22.3% said it saved them 11–20 min, 29.5% said it saved them 21–30 min, 21.4% said it saved 31–40 min, 2.67% said it saved 41–50 min, and 7.14% said it saved more than 50 min per clinic session. Regarding how student providers used the additional time they gained from the FRS, 96.4% said they used some of the time to write up their notes, 88.4% said they used some of the time to discuss treatments with their patients, 83.9% said they engaged in general conversation with their patients, 81.3% said they took care of other patient-related duties, while 1.8% said they had less time available after the implementation of the FRS. Conclusions: The FRS enabled student providers to remain with their patients for almost a full 30 min more (during a 3 h session). This paper describes several benefits experienced by student providers, and the resulting impacts on patient experiences. MDPI 2019-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6631225/ /pubmed/31052353 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj7020044 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Virun, Vladyslav
Singhe Dhaliwal, Gurmukh
Liu, Chieh-Han (Jeffrey)
Sharma, Pranshu
Kaur, Harleen
Nalliah, Romesh P.
Improving Efficiency in Dental School Clinics by Computerizing a Manual Task
title Improving Efficiency in Dental School Clinics by Computerizing a Manual Task
title_full Improving Efficiency in Dental School Clinics by Computerizing a Manual Task
title_fullStr Improving Efficiency in Dental School Clinics by Computerizing a Manual Task
title_full_unstemmed Improving Efficiency in Dental School Clinics by Computerizing a Manual Task
title_short Improving Efficiency in Dental School Clinics by Computerizing a Manual Task
title_sort improving efficiency in dental school clinics by computerizing a manual task
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6631225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31052353
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj7020044
work_keys_str_mv AT virunvladyslav improvingefficiencyindentalschoolclinicsbycomputerizingamanualtask
AT singhedhaliwalgurmukh improvingefficiencyindentalschoolclinicsbycomputerizingamanualtask
AT liuchiehhanjeffrey improvingefficiencyindentalschoolclinicsbycomputerizingamanualtask
AT sharmapranshu improvingefficiencyindentalschoolclinicsbycomputerizingamanualtask
AT kaurharleen improvingefficiencyindentalschoolclinicsbycomputerizingamanualtask
AT nalliahromeshp improvingefficiencyindentalschoolclinicsbycomputerizingamanualtask