Cargando…

Evaluation of Machine Learning Algorithms for Surface Water Extraction in a Landsat 8 Scene of Nepal †

With over 6000 rivers and 5358 lakes, surface water is one of the most important resources in Nepal. However, the quantity and quality of Nepal’s rivers and lakes are decreasing due to human activities and climate change. Despite the advancement of remote sensing technology and the availability of o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Acharya, Tri Dev, Subedi, Anoj, Lee, Dong Ha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6631528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31226778
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19122769
_version_ 1783435538291752960
author Acharya, Tri Dev
Subedi, Anoj
Lee, Dong Ha
author_facet Acharya, Tri Dev
Subedi, Anoj
Lee, Dong Ha
author_sort Acharya, Tri Dev
collection PubMed
description With over 6000 rivers and 5358 lakes, surface water is one of the most important resources in Nepal. However, the quantity and quality of Nepal’s rivers and lakes are decreasing due to human activities and climate change. Despite the advancement of remote sensing technology and the availability of open access data and tools, the monitoring and surface water extraction works has not been carried out in Nepal. Single or multiple water index methods have been applied in the extraction of surface water with satisfactory results. Extending our previous study, the authors evaluated six different machine learning algorithms: Naive Bayes (NB), recursive partitioning and regression trees (RPART), neural networks (NNET), support vector machines (SVM), random forest (RF), and gradient boosted machines (GBM) to extract surface water in Nepal. With three secondary bands, slope, NDVI and NDWI, the algorithms were evaluated for performance with the addition of extra information. As a result, all the applied machine learning algorithms, except NB and RPART, showed good performance. RF showed overall accuracy (OA) and kappa coefficient (Kappa) of 1 for the all the multiband data with the reference dataset, followed by GBM, NNET, and SVM in metrics. The performances were better in the hilly regions and flat lands, but not well in the Himalayas with ice, snow and shadows, and the addition of slope and NDWI showed improvement in the results. Adding single secondary bands is better than adding multiple in most algorithms except NNET. From current and previous studies, it is recommended to separate any study area with and without snow or low and high elevation, then apply machine learning algorithms in original Landsat data or with the addition of slopes or NDWI for better performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6631528
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66315282019-08-19 Evaluation of Machine Learning Algorithms for Surface Water Extraction in a Landsat 8 Scene of Nepal † Acharya, Tri Dev Subedi, Anoj Lee, Dong Ha Sensors (Basel) Article With over 6000 rivers and 5358 lakes, surface water is one of the most important resources in Nepal. However, the quantity and quality of Nepal’s rivers and lakes are decreasing due to human activities and climate change. Despite the advancement of remote sensing technology and the availability of open access data and tools, the monitoring and surface water extraction works has not been carried out in Nepal. Single or multiple water index methods have been applied in the extraction of surface water with satisfactory results. Extending our previous study, the authors evaluated six different machine learning algorithms: Naive Bayes (NB), recursive partitioning and regression trees (RPART), neural networks (NNET), support vector machines (SVM), random forest (RF), and gradient boosted machines (GBM) to extract surface water in Nepal. With three secondary bands, slope, NDVI and NDWI, the algorithms were evaluated for performance with the addition of extra information. As a result, all the applied machine learning algorithms, except NB and RPART, showed good performance. RF showed overall accuracy (OA) and kappa coefficient (Kappa) of 1 for the all the multiband data with the reference dataset, followed by GBM, NNET, and SVM in metrics. The performances were better in the hilly regions and flat lands, but not well in the Himalayas with ice, snow and shadows, and the addition of slope and NDWI showed improvement in the results. Adding single secondary bands is better than adding multiple in most algorithms except NNET. From current and previous studies, it is recommended to separate any study area with and without snow or low and high elevation, then apply machine learning algorithms in original Landsat data or with the addition of slopes or NDWI for better performance. MDPI 2019-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6631528/ /pubmed/31226778 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19122769 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Acharya, Tri Dev
Subedi, Anoj
Lee, Dong Ha
Evaluation of Machine Learning Algorithms for Surface Water Extraction in a Landsat 8 Scene of Nepal †
title Evaluation of Machine Learning Algorithms for Surface Water Extraction in a Landsat 8 Scene of Nepal †
title_full Evaluation of Machine Learning Algorithms for Surface Water Extraction in a Landsat 8 Scene of Nepal †
title_fullStr Evaluation of Machine Learning Algorithms for Surface Water Extraction in a Landsat 8 Scene of Nepal †
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Machine Learning Algorithms for Surface Water Extraction in a Landsat 8 Scene of Nepal †
title_short Evaluation of Machine Learning Algorithms for Surface Water Extraction in a Landsat 8 Scene of Nepal †
title_sort evaluation of machine learning algorithms for surface water extraction in a landsat 8 scene of nepal †
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6631528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31226778
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19122769
work_keys_str_mv AT acharyatridev evaluationofmachinelearningalgorithmsforsurfacewaterextractioninalandsat8sceneofnepal
AT subedianoj evaluationofmachinelearningalgorithmsforsurfacewaterextractioninalandsat8sceneofnepal
AT leedongha evaluationofmachinelearningalgorithmsforsurfacewaterextractioninalandsat8sceneofnepal