Cargando…

Women’s perspectives on caesarean section recovery, infection and the PREPS trial: a qualitative pilot study

BACKGROUND: In England, 27.8% of all pregnant women undergo caesarean sections (CS) to deliver their babies. Women undergoing CS are at risk of developing sepsis and post-natal infections, which not only contribute significantly to maternal mortality and morbidity, but also negatively impact upon po...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weckesser, Annalise, Farmer, Nicola, Dam, Rinita, Wilson, Amie, Morton, Victoria Hodgetts, Morris, R. Katie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6631540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31307417
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2402-8
_version_ 1783435541132345344
author Weckesser, Annalise
Farmer, Nicola
Dam, Rinita
Wilson, Amie
Morton, Victoria Hodgetts
Morris, R. Katie
author_facet Weckesser, Annalise
Farmer, Nicola
Dam, Rinita
Wilson, Amie
Morton, Victoria Hodgetts
Morris, R. Katie
author_sort Weckesser, Annalise
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In England, 27.8% of all pregnant women undergo caesarean sections (CS) to deliver their babies. Women undergoing CS are at risk of developing sepsis and post-natal infections, which not only contribute significantly to maternal mortality and morbidity, but also negatively impact upon post-natal recovery and wellbeing. This study explores patients’ priorities in relation to CS recovery, focusing on their knowledge and experiences of infection prevention. The study formed part of the PREPS (Vaginal Preparation at caesarean section to Reduce Endometritis and Prevent Sepsis – a feasibility study of chlorhexidine) Trial; patients’ views on the PREPS Trial were also sought. METHODS: Using qualitative methodology, two focus groups and six telephone interviews were carried out between September and October 2017 with a total of 21 women who had undergone a CS within the preceding six months. Focus groups and individual telephone interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim; a thematic analysis was conducted using NVivo 11. RESULTS: Women’s priorities around CS recovery centred on pain (or the lack thereof), mobility and the ability to resume everyday activities, including caregiving. Those undergoing a CS for the first time reported not feeling confident in their ability to identify signs of infection and sought visiting health professionals’ expertise and reassurance. Women were unable to recall whether they had received information regarding infection prevention and felt that they had not received sufficient advice. Some reported receiving general information regarding CS recovery, which ranged in quality. Prevention of womb infection is a major goal of the PREPS trial, however, the majority of women were not aware that womb (as opposed to wound) infection was a post CS risk. CONCLUSIONS: Women undergoing a CS want more information on what constitutes a ‘normal’ post-operative recovery and specifically would welcome written information and infection prevention advice. This should be a key element of improving post-CS maternal experiences and potentially reducing sepsis and infection rates. CS stigma negatively impacts women’s recovery experiences and possibly information provision. The PREPS team incorporated findings regarding consent pathways for recruiting women into intrapartum research and developed two patient reported outcomes to collect in the main trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The PREPS trial has been registered with ISRCTN on the 10th July 2017 (ISRCTN33435996).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6631540
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66315402019-07-24 Women’s perspectives on caesarean section recovery, infection and the PREPS trial: a qualitative pilot study Weckesser, Annalise Farmer, Nicola Dam, Rinita Wilson, Amie Morton, Victoria Hodgetts Morris, R. Katie BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: In England, 27.8% of all pregnant women undergo caesarean sections (CS) to deliver their babies. Women undergoing CS are at risk of developing sepsis and post-natal infections, which not only contribute significantly to maternal mortality and morbidity, but also negatively impact upon post-natal recovery and wellbeing. This study explores patients’ priorities in relation to CS recovery, focusing on their knowledge and experiences of infection prevention. The study formed part of the PREPS (Vaginal Preparation at caesarean section to Reduce Endometritis and Prevent Sepsis – a feasibility study of chlorhexidine) Trial; patients’ views on the PREPS Trial were also sought. METHODS: Using qualitative methodology, two focus groups and six telephone interviews were carried out between September and October 2017 with a total of 21 women who had undergone a CS within the preceding six months. Focus groups and individual telephone interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim; a thematic analysis was conducted using NVivo 11. RESULTS: Women’s priorities around CS recovery centred on pain (or the lack thereof), mobility and the ability to resume everyday activities, including caregiving. Those undergoing a CS for the first time reported not feeling confident in their ability to identify signs of infection and sought visiting health professionals’ expertise and reassurance. Women were unable to recall whether they had received information regarding infection prevention and felt that they had not received sufficient advice. Some reported receiving general information regarding CS recovery, which ranged in quality. Prevention of womb infection is a major goal of the PREPS trial, however, the majority of women were not aware that womb (as opposed to wound) infection was a post CS risk. CONCLUSIONS: Women undergoing a CS want more information on what constitutes a ‘normal’ post-operative recovery and specifically would welcome written information and infection prevention advice. This should be a key element of improving post-CS maternal experiences and potentially reducing sepsis and infection rates. CS stigma negatively impacts women’s recovery experiences and possibly information provision. The PREPS team incorporated findings regarding consent pathways for recruiting women into intrapartum research and developed two patient reported outcomes to collect in the main trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The PREPS trial has been registered with ISRCTN on the 10th July 2017 (ISRCTN33435996). BioMed Central 2019-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6631540/ /pubmed/31307417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2402-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Weckesser, Annalise
Farmer, Nicola
Dam, Rinita
Wilson, Amie
Morton, Victoria Hodgetts
Morris, R. Katie
Women’s perspectives on caesarean section recovery, infection and the PREPS trial: a qualitative pilot study
title Women’s perspectives on caesarean section recovery, infection and the PREPS trial: a qualitative pilot study
title_full Women’s perspectives on caesarean section recovery, infection and the PREPS trial: a qualitative pilot study
title_fullStr Women’s perspectives on caesarean section recovery, infection and the PREPS trial: a qualitative pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Women’s perspectives on caesarean section recovery, infection and the PREPS trial: a qualitative pilot study
title_short Women’s perspectives on caesarean section recovery, infection and the PREPS trial: a qualitative pilot study
title_sort women’s perspectives on caesarean section recovery, infection and the preps trial: a qualitative pilot study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6631540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31307417
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2402-8
work_keys_str_mv AT weckesserannalise womensperspectivesoncaesareansectionrecoveryinfectionandtheprepstrialaqualitativepilotstudy
AT farmernicola womensperspectivesoncaesareansectionrecoveryinfectionandtheprepstrialaqualitativepilotstudy
AT damrinita womensperspectivesoncaesareansectionrecoveryinfectionandtheprepstrialaqualitativepilotstudy
AT wilsonamie womensperspectivesoncaesareansectionrecoveryinfectionandtheprepstrialaqualitativepilotstudy
AT mortonvictoriahodgetts womensperspectivesoncaesareansectionrecoveryinfectionandtheprepstrialaqualitativepilotstudy
AT morrisrkatie womensperspectivesoncaesareansectionrecoveryinfectionandtheprepstrialaqualitativepilotstudy