Cargando…

Effect of Water Stress during Grain Filling on Yield, Quality and Physiological Traits of Illpa and Rainbow Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) Cultivars

The total area under quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivation and the consumption of its grain have increased in recent years because of its nutritional properties and ability to grow under adverse conditions, such as drought. Climate change scenarios predict extended periods of drought and th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gámez, Angie L., Soba, David, Zamarreño, Ángel M., García-Mina, José M., Aranjuelo, Iker, Morales, Fermín
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6631622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31207888
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants8060173
_version_ 1783435560694579200
author Gámez, Angie L.
Soba, David
Zamarreño, Ángel M.
García-Mina, José M.
Aranjuelo, Iker
Morales, Fermín
author_facet Gámez, Angie L.
Soba, David
Zamarreño, Ángel M.
García-Mina, José M.
Aranjuelo, Iker
Morales, Fermín
author_sort Gámez, Angie L.
collection PubMed
description The total area under quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivation and the consumption of its grain have increased in recent years because of its nutritional properties and ability to grow under adverse conditions, such as drought. Climate change scenarios predict extended periods of drought and this has emphasized the need for new crops that are tolerant to these conditions. The main goal of this work was to evaluate crop yield and quality parameters and to characterize the physiology of two varieties of quinoa grown under water deficit in greenhouse conditions. Two varieties of quinoa from the Chilean coast (Rainbow) and altiplano (Illpa) were used, grown under full irrigation or two different levels of water deficit applied during the grain filling period. There were no marked differences in yield and quality parameters between treatments, but the root biomass was higher in plants grown under severe water deficit conditions compared to control. Photosynthesis, transpiration and stomatal conductance decreased with increased water stress in both cultivars, but the coastal variety showed higher water use efficiency and less discrimination of (13)C under water deficit. This response was associated with greater root development and a better stomatal opening adjustment, especially in the case of Rainbow. The capacity of Rainbow to increase its osmoregulant content (compounds such as proline, glutamine, glutamate, K and Na) could enable a potential osmotic adjustment in this variety. Moreover, the lower stomatal opening and transpiration rates were also associated with higher leaf ABA concentration values detected in Rainbow. We found negative logarithmic relationships between stomatal conductance and leaf ABA concentration in both varieties, with significant R(2) values of 0.50 and 0.22 in Rainbow and Illpa, respectively. These moderate-to-medium values suggest that, in addition to ABA signaling, other causes for stomatal closure in quinoa under drought such as hydraulic regulation may play a role. In conclusion, this work showed that two quinoa cultivars use different strategies in the face of water deficit stress, and these prevent decreases in grain yield and quality under drought conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6631622
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66316222019-08-19 Effect of Water Stress during Grain Filling on Yield, Quality and Physiological Traits of Illpa and Rainbow Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) Cultivars Gámez, Angie L. Soba, David Zamarreño, Ángel M. García-Mina, José M. Aranjuelo, Iker Morales, Fermín Plants (Basel) Article The total area under quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivation and the consumption of its grain have increased in recent years because of its nutritional properties and ability to grow under adverse conditions, such as drought. Climate change scenarios predict extended periods of drought and this has emphasized the need for new crops that are tolerant to these conditions. The main goal of this work was to evaluate crop yield and quality parameters and to characterize the physiology of two varieties of quinoa grown under water deficit in greenhouse conditions. Two varieties of quinoa from the Chilean coast (Rainbow) and altiplano (Illpa) were used, grown under full irrigation or two different levels of water deficit applied during the grain filling period. There were no marked differences in yield and quality parameters between treatments, but the root biomass was higher in plants grown under severe water deficit conditions compared to control. Photosynthesis, transpiration and stomatal conductance decreased with increased water stress in both cultivars, but the coastal variety showed higher water use efficiency and less discrimination of (13)C under water deficit. This response was associated with greater root development and a better stomatal opening adjustment, especially in the case of Rainbow. The capacity of Rainbow to increase its osmoregulant content (compounds such as proline, glutamine, glutamate, K and Na) could enable a potential osmotic adjustment in this variety. Moreover, the lower stomatal opening and transpiration rates were also associated with higher leaf ABA concentration values detected in Rainbow. We found negative logarithmic relationships between stomatal conductance and leaf ABA concentration in both varieties, with significant R(2) values of 0.50 and 0.22 in Rainbow and Illpa, respectively. These moderate-to-medium values suggest that, in addition to ABA signaling, other causes for stomatal closure in quinoa under drought such as hydraulic regulation may play a role. In conclusion, this work showed that two quinoa cultivars use different strategies in the face of water deficit stress, and these prevent decreases in grain yield and quality under drought conditions. MDPI 2019-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6631622/ /pubmed/31207888 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants8060173 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Gámez, Angie L.
Soba, David
Zamarreño, Ángel M.
García-Mina, José M.
Aranjuelo, Iker
Morales, Fermín
Effect of Water Stress during Grain Filling on Yield, Quality and Physiological Traits of Illpa and Rainbow Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) Cultivars
title Effect of Water Stress during Grain Filling on Yield, Quality and Physiological Traits of Illpa and Rainbow Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) Cultivars
title_full Effect of Water Stress during Grain Filling on Yield, Quality and Physiological Traits of Illpa and Rainbow Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) Cultivars
title_fullStr Effect of Water Stress during Grain Filling on Yield, Quality and Physiological Traits of Illpa and Rainbow Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) Cultivars
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Water Stress during Grain Filling on Yield, Quality and Physiological Traits of Illpa and Rainbow Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) Cultivars
title_short Effect of Water Stress during Grain Filling on Yield, Quality and Physiological Traits of Illpa and Rainbow Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) Cultivars
title_sort effect of water stress during grain filling on yield, quality and physiological traits of illpa and rainbow quinoa (chenopodium quinoa willd.) cultivars
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6631622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31207888
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants8060173
work_keys_str_mv AT gamezangiel effectofwaterstressduringgrainfillingonyieldqualityandphysiologicaltraitsofillpaandrainbowquinoachenopodiumquinoawilldcultivars
AT sobadavid effectofwaterstressduringgrainfillingonyieldqualityandphysiologicaltraitsofillpaandrainbowquinoachenopodiumquinoawilldcultivars
AT zamarrenoangelm effectofwaterstressduringgrainfillingonyieldqualityandphysiologicaltraitsofillpaandrainbowquinoachenopodiumquinoawilldcultivars
AT garciaminajosem effectofwaterstressduringgrainfillingonyieldqualityandphysiologicaltraitsofillpaandrainbowquinoachenopodiumquinoawilldcultivars
AT aranjueloiker effectofwaterstressduringgrainfillingonyieldqualityandphysiologicaltraitsofillpaandrainbowquinoachenopodiumquinoawilldcultivars
AT moralesfermin effectofwaterstressduringgrainfillingonyieldqualityandphysiologicaltraitsofillpaandrainbowquinoachenopodiumquinoawilldcultivars