Cargando…
Cleavage Stage versus Blastocyst Stage Embryo Transfer in Oocyte Donation Cycles
Background and Objective: During the last few years, a trend has been noted towards embryos being transferred at the blastocyst stage, which has been associated with improved rates regarding implantation and clinical pregnancy in comparison to cleavage stage embryo transfers. There is a limited numb...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6631639/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31226849 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina55060293 |
_version_ | 1783435564833308672 |
---|---|
author | Kontopoulos, George Simopoulou, Mara Zervomanolakis, Ioannis Prokopakis, Thomas Dimitropoulos, Kostas Dedoulis, Evaggelos Grigorakis, Stylianos Agapitou, Kristi Nikitos, Eros Rapani, Anna Vlahos, Nikos |
author_facet | Kontopoulos, George Simopoulou, Mara Zervomanolakis, Ioannis Prokopakis, Thomas Dimitropoulos, Kostas Dedoulis, Evaggelos Grigorakis, Stylianos Agapitou, Kristi Nikitos, Eros Rapani, Anna Vlahos, Nikos |
author_sort | Kontopoulos, George |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and Objective: During the last few years, a trend has been noted towards embryos being transferred at the blastocyst stage, which has been associated with improved rates regarding implantation and clinical pregnancy in comparison to cleavage stage embryo transfers. There is a limited number of studies investigating this notion in oocyte donation cycles employing cryopreserved embryos. The aim of this study is to evaluate the implantation potential and clinical pregnancy rates between the day 3 cleavage stage and blastocyst stage embryo transfers in oocyte donation cycles employing vitrified embryos. Methods: This is a retrospective evaluation of oocyte donation frozen–thawed transfers completed in our clinic from January 2017 to December 2017. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection was conducted for all oocytes. Following fertilization, all embryos were cryopreserved either at the cleavage or blastocyst stage. Embryo transfer of two embryos was performed under direct sonographic guidance in all cases. Results: Our results confirmed a 55.6% clinical pregnancy (CP) resulting from day 3 embryo transfers, a 68.8% CP from day 5, and 71.4% CP from day 6. Significantly improved pregnancy rates were related to embryo transfers at the blastocyst stage when compared to cleavage stage transfers (68.9% and 55.6% respectively, p = 0.016). The risk with regards to multiple pregnancies was similar. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that in oocyte donation cycles employing vitrified embryos, embryo transfer at the blastocyst stage is accompanied with a significant improvement in pregnancy rates and merits further investigation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6631639 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66316392019-08-19 Cleavage Stage versus Blastocyst Stage Embryo Transfer in Oocyte Donation Cycles Kontopoulos, George Simopoulou, Mara Zervomanolakis, Ioannis Prokopakis, Thomas Dimitropoulos, Kostas Dedoulis, Evaggelos Grigorakis, Stylianos Agapitou, Kristi Nikitos, Eros Rapani, Anna Vlahos, Nikos Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and Objective: During the last few years, a trend has been noted towards embryos being transferred at the blastocyst stage, which has been associated with improved rates regarding implantation and clinical pregnancy in comparison to cleavage stage embryo transfers. There is a limited number of studies investigating this notion in oocyte donation cycles employing cryopreserved embryos. The aim of this study is to evaluate the implantation potential and clinical pregnancy rates between the day 3 cleavage stage and blastocyst stage embryo transfers in oocyte donation cycles employing vitrified embryos. Methods: This is a retrospective evaluation of oocyte donation frozen–thawed transfers completed in our clinic from January 2017 to December 2017. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection was conducted for all oocytes. Following fertilization, all embryos were cryopreserved either at the cleavage or blastocyst stage. Embryo transfer of two embryos was performed under direct sonographic guidance in all cases. Results: Our results confirmed a 55.6% clinical pregnancy (CP) resulting from day 3 embryo transfers, a 68.8% CP from day 5, and 71.4% CP from day 6. Significantly improved pregnancy rates were related to embryo transfers at the blastocyst stage when compared to cleavage stage transfers (68.9% and 55.6% respectively, p = 0.016). The risk with regards to multiple pregnancies was similar. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that in oocyte donation cycles employing vitrified embryos, embryo transfer at the blastocyst stage is accompanied with a significant improvement in pregnancy rates and merits further investigation. MDPI 2019-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6631639/ /pubmed/31226849 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina55060293 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Kontopoulos, George Simopoulou, Mara Zervomanolakis, Ioannis Prokopakis, Thomas Dimitropoulos, Kostas Dedoulis, Evaggelos Grigorakis, Stylianos Agapitou, Kristi Nikitos, Eros Rapani, Anna Vlahos, Nikos Cleavage Stage versus Blastocyst Stage Embryo Transfer in Oocyte Donation Cycles |
title | Cleavage Stage versus Blastocyst Stage Embryo Transfer in Oocyte Donation Cycles |
title_full | Cleavage Stage versus Blastocyst Stage Embryo Transfer in Oocyte Donation Cycles |
title_fullStr | Cleavage Stage versus Blastocyst Stage Embryo Transfer in Oocyte Donation Cycles |
title_full_unstemmed | Cleavage Stage versus Blastocyst Stage Embryo Transfer in Oocyte Donation Cycles |
title_short | Cleavage Stage versus Blastocyst Stage Embryo Transfer in Oocyte Donation Cycles |
title_sort | cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in oocyte donation cycles |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6631639/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31226849 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina55060293 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kontopoulosgeorge cleavagestageversusblastocyststageembryotransferinoocytedonationcycles AT simopouloumara cleavagestageversusblastocyststageembryotransferinoocytedonationcycles AT zervomanolakisioannis cleavagestageversusblastocyststageembryotransferinoocytedonationcycles AT prokopakisthomas cleavagestageversusblastocyststageembryotransferinoocytedonationcycles AT dimitropouloskostas cleavagestageversusblastocyststageembryotransferinoocytedonationcycles AT dedoulisevaggelos cleavagestageversusblastocyststageembryotransferinoocytedonationcycles AT grigorakisstylianos cleavagestageversusblastocyststageembryotransferinoocytedonationcycles AT agapitoukristi cleavagestageversusblastocyststageembryotransferinoocytedonationcycles AT nikitoseros cleavagestageversusblastocyststageembryotransferinoocytedonationcycles AT rapanianna cleavagestageversusblastocyststageembryotransferinoocytedonationcycles AT vlahosnikos cleavagestageversusblastocyststageembryotransferinoocytedonationcycles |