Cargando…
Ear, tail and skin lesions vary according to different production flows in a farrow-to-finish pig farm
BACKGROUND: Pig performance and risk of disease are associated with production flow. Given the link between health and welfare, it is likely that animal welfare indicators are also associated with production flow. This study investigated the association between production flow and tail, ear and skin...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6631755/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31346475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-019-0126-9 |
_version_ | 1783435592406663168 |
---|---|
author | Diana, Alessia Boyle, Laura Ann García Manzanilla, Edgar Leonard, Finola Catherine Calderón Díaz, Julia Adriana |
author_facet | Diana, Alessia Boyle, Laura Ann García Manzanilla, Edgar Leonard, Finola Catherine Calderón Díaz, Julia Adriana |
author_sort | Diana, Alessia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Pig performance and risk of disease are associated with production flow. Given the link between health and welfare, it is likely that animal welfare indicators are also associated with production flow. This study investigated the association between production flow and tail, ear and skin lesions on a farm with a purported ‘all-in/all-out’ policy. This was an observational study whereby pigs were managed according to routine farm practice. A total of 1,016 pigs born within 1 week from the same batch were followed through the production stages and the presence or absence of welfare indicators was recorded at 4, 7, 9, 12, 16 and 24 weeks of age. Three production flows were retrospectively identified: flow 1 = ‘normal’ pigs that advanced through the production stages together ‘on time’, flow 2 = pigs delayed from advancing from the 1(st) to the 2(nd) nursery stage by 1 week and flow 3 = pigs delayed from advancing through the production stages by > 1 week. A nested case control design was applied by matching pigs by sow parity, number of born alive and birth weight. RESULTS: The presence of ear lesions was 4.5 less likely in pigs in flow 2 and 2.9 times less likely in pigs in flow 3 (P < 0.001) compared to pigs in flow 1. Pigs in flow 3 were 2.2 more likely to have tail and 1.6 times more likely to have ear lesions (P < 0.001) compared to pigs in flow 2. Pigs in flow 2 were less likely to have tail lesions compared with pigs in flow 1 (P < 0.05). Differences between production flows for the risk of skin lesions varied according to age (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: All production flows were associated with a high risk of lesions which raises concerns for pig welfare. However, risks for ear, tail and skin lesions varied according to each production flow likely due to the specific management practices inherent to each flow. Results from this study could be used to modify existing management practices, thus leading to improvements in animal welfare and possibly performance in intensive pig systems. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6631755 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66317552019-07-25 Ear, tail and skin lesions vary according to different production flows in a farrow-to-finish pig farm Diana, Alessia Boyle, Laura Ann García Manzanilla, Edgar Leonard, Finola Catherine Calderón Díaz, Julia Adriana Porcine Health Manag Research BACKGROUND: Pig performance and risk of disease are associated with production flow. Given the link between health and welfare, it is likely that animal welfare indicators are also associated with production flow. This study investigated the association between production flow and tail, ear and skin lesions on a farm with a purported ‘all-in/all-out’ policy. This was an observational study whereby pigs were managed according to routine farm practice. A total of 1,016 pigs born within 1 week from the same batch were followed through the production stages and the presence or absence of welfare indicators was recorded at 4, 7, 9, 12, 16 and 24 weeks of age. Three production flows were retrospectively identified: flow 1 = ‘normal’ pigs that advanced through the production stages together ‘on time’, flow 2 = pigs delayed from advancing from the 1(st) to the 2(nd) nursery stage by 1 week and flow 3 = pigs delayed from advancing through the production stages by > 1 week. A nested case control design was applied by matching pigs by sow parity, number of born alive and birth weight. RESULTS: The presence of ear lesions was 4.5 less likely in pigs in flow 2 and 2.9 times less likely in pigs in flow 3 (P < 0.001) compared to pigs in flow 1. Pigs in flow 3 were 2.2 more likely to have tail and 1.6 times more likely to have ear lesions (P < 0.001) compared to pigs in flow 2. Pigs in flow 2 were less likely to have tail lesions compared with pigs in flow 1 (P < 0.05). Differences between production flows for the risk of skin lesions varied according to age (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: All production flows were associated with a high risk of lesions which raises concerns for pig welfare. However, risks for ear, tail and skin lesions varied according to each production flow likely due to the specific management practices inherent to each flow. Results from this study could be used to modify existing management practices, thus leading to improvements in animal welfare and possibly performance in intensive pig systems. BioMed Central 2019-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6631755/ /pubmed/31346475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-019-0126-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Diana, Alessia Boyle, Laura Ann García Manzanilla, Edgar Leonard, Finola Catherine Calderón Díaz, Julia Adriana Ear, tail and skin lesions vary according to different production flows in a farrow-to-finish pig farm |
title | Ear, tail and skin lesions vary according to different production flows in a farrow-to-finish pig farm |
title_full | Ear, tail and skin lesions vary according to different production flows in a farrow-to-finish pig farm |
title_fullStr | Ear, tail and skin lesions vary according to different production flows in a farrow-to-finish pig farm |
title_full_unstemmed | Ear, tail and skin lesions vary according to different production flows in a farrow-to-finish pig farm |
title_short | Ear, tail and skin lesions vary according to different production flows in a farrow-to-finish pig farm |
title_sort | ear, tail and skin lesions vary according to different production flows in a farrow-to-finish pig farm |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6631755/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31346475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-019-0126-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dianaalessia eartailandskinlesionsvaryaccordingtodifferentproductionflowsinafarrowtofinishpigfarm AT boylelauraann eartailandskinlesionsvaryaccordingtodifferentproductionflowsinafarrowtofinishpigfarm AT garciamanzanillaedgar eartailandskinlesionsvaryaccordingtodifferentproductionflowsinafarrowtofinishpigfarm AT leonardfinolacatherine eartailandskinlesionsvaryaccordingtodifferentproductionflowsinafarrowtofinishpigfarm AT calderondiazjuliaadriana eartailandskinlesionsvaryaccordingtodifferentproductionflowsinafarrowtofinishpigfarm |